Seconded
Thirded ? [you no wot i mean]
Good song cant see the problem. Mind you Jack White is an aquired taste and i wouldn’t have paired him with Alicia Keys normally,but the song works. To be honest iv’e a bigger problem with the stupid tite of the film.:)
Good song cant see the problem. Mind you Jack White is an aquired taste and i wouldn’t have paired him with Alicia Keys normally,but the song works. To be honest iv’e a bigger problem with the stupid tite of the film.:)
1st and way out front Convair B-58 Hustler
2/ Any Mosquito
3/ HP-42
4/ Boeing 314 clipper
For starters
Thanks avion ancien for one of the best threads for a long while very enjoyable searching but failing to find the answer!:D
Something to do with Voisin/Farman ?
Is it to do with Leon Delagrange and Thérèse Peltier
This is the first unofficial flight by a female aviator
if so not very well documented or wildly way off?
funny joke just might be a bit to early for glitter jokes
Doesn’t that depend on how old your daughter is, she could be 40 as far as we know and tear the piece of filth to pieces, forget the Glitter jokes, the sick perverted scumbag isn’t worth even thinking about, it’s not very funny, ok. We can all delve into our depths and find sick jokes about anything, but dredging up Paul Gadd is not a good idea, the pervert is still freewheeling around the world trying to find his next port of call in order to force his ugly old bloated body on his next victim, lets just hope he dies very painfully at the hands of a family member whom he has raped and mistreated, a bit of ignited petrol around the testicles would do nicely, I’d do it myself.
Sick jokes are all very well, but not when the miscreant is at large and capable of carrying out further acts of degeneration, he deserves to die in agony, hung, drawing and quartering spring to mind, he deserves it.
His music was **** anyway.
Please dont hold back say what you mean !!
tend to agree with Pete on this one apart from the music which i quite liked.
funny joke just might be a bit to early for glitter jokes
Doesn’t that depend on how old your daughter is, she could be 40 as far as we know and tear the piece of filth to pieces, forget the Glitter jokes, the sick perverted scumbag isn’t worth even thinking about, it’s not very funny, ok. We can all delve into our depths and find sick jokes about anything, but dredging up Paul Gadd is not a good idea, the pervert is still freewheeling around the world trying to find his next port of call in order to force his ugly old bloated body on his next victim, lets just hope he dies very painfully at the hands of a family member whom he has raped and mistreated, a bit of ignited petrol around the testicles would do nicely, I’d do it myself.
Sick jokes are all very well, but not when the miscreant is at large and capable of carrying out further acts of degeneration, he deserves to die in agony, hung, drawing and quartering spring to mind, he deserves it.
His music was **** anyway.
Please dont hold back say what you mean !!
tend to agree with Pete on this one apart from the music which i quite liked.
Quote from Niki Lauda says it all really
“In the past, there have always been rumours and stories – and I’ve always been completely against them because they’ve never been proven – that Ferrari, because of its past and history, was always against McLaren with the stewards and the FIA, who if there was a decision, were in favour of Ferrari,” said Lauda.
“I’ve always said this is bulls**t, that this is a sport and you have to be neutral, but the decision yesterday makes me believe that everyone is watching Ferrari in a positive way and McLaren in a very negative way.
“What developed yesterday is the biggest mess the sport has ever done.”
Full article
http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=43875
Quote from Niki Lauda says it all really
“In the past, there have always been rumours and stories – and I’ve always been completely against them because they’ve never been proven – that Ferrari, because of its past and history, was always against McLaren with the stewards and the FIA, who if there was a decision, were in favour of Ferrari,” said Lauda.
“I’ve always said this is bulls**t, that this is a sport and you have to be neutral, but the decision yesterday makes me believe that everyone is watching Ferrari in a positive way and McLaren in a very negative way.
“What developed yesterday is the biggest mess the sport has ever done.”
Full article
http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=43875
I thought the FIA was french ie:Federation International Motorsport or some such ?
I thought the FIA was french ie:Federation International Motorsport or some such ?
I didn’t see the race so didn’t see the incident. But paulc and Stangman did. I just wonder whether either of them would be so keen to actually present these claims to Ferrari, the Stewards and their respective legal teams? That’s the problem with internet fora, people feel free to say in anonymity what they wouldn’t say to someone’s face, in this case, Ferrari or the stewards.
Would either of you care to address these claims directly to those you have accused without any evidence, substantiation or the decency of revealing to them your true identities?
Regards,
kev35
Calm down it’s only my opinion of what i saw just like everyone else who watched the race on tv. And yes if i was asked by Ferrari or anyone else i would repeat the statement, there is no way Hamilton should have got a 25 sec penalty for what could only be described as at worst a slight advantage. On the day he drove better in the rain than the Ferrari, they cried and someone listened. Switch Hamilton for Raikkonen and see if the penalty would have been so severe, i don’t think so.
Again only my opinion and i do not think anyone from Ferrari or the Stewards gives a flying who har what i thimk.
[as you can guess quite annoyed by the outcome of the race, but in the great scheme of things it’s no big deal. ] ooh that’s my opinion again
I didn’t see the race so didn’t see the incident. But paulc and Stangman did. I just wonder whether either of them would be so keen to actually present these claims to Ferrari, the Stewards and their respective legal teams? That’s the problem with internet fora, people feel free to say in anonymity what they wouldn’t say to someone’s face, in this case, Ferrari or the stewards.
Would either of you care to address these claims directly to those you have accused without any evidence, substantiation or the decency of revealing to them your true identities?
Regards,
kev35
Calm down it’s only my opinion of what i saw just like everyone else who watched the race on tv. And yes if i was asked by Ferrari or anyone else i would repeat the statement, there is no way Hamilton should have got a 25 sec penalty for what could only be described as at worst a slight advantage. On the day he drove better in the rain than the Ferrari, they cried and someone listened. Switch Hamilton for Raikkonen and see if the penalty would have been so severe, i don’t think so.
Again only my opinion and i do not think anyone from Ferrari or the Stewards gives a flying who har what i thimk.
[as you can guess quite annoyed by the outcome of the race, but in the great scheme of things it’s no big deal. ] ooh that’s my opinion again