dark light

super sioux

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Some photos I forgot I had.. #1220777
    super sioux
    Participant

    Not a crash?

    [ATTACH]169075[/ATTACH]

    I think he might just make it if he, the pilot is in control!

    in reply to: political vapour #2494363
    super sioux
    Participant

    Aircraft need aircraft carriers!

    [QUOTE=slipperysam;1347051]Er.. again i am posting, whats this got to do with military aviation?

    I refer you to the title of this thread slipperysam and reiterate the RN wont need new aircraft without carriers. A good point was raised and even the loss or delay of support vessels would interfere with any future carrier operations.

    in reply to: Besler Steam Plane. #1180529
    super sioux
    Participant

    Nazi steam aero. engines ?

    Being an old git I have read and seen the Besler steam powered aircraft before! But I have also read that the Germans looked into the idea but can’t
    remember the source, anybody else got any info?
    Ray

    in reply to: Twin boom cargo aircraft #1181056
    super sioux
    Participant

    They were replaced by clamshell doors when it was developed into the Blackburn Beverley, the tailboom on this was used for extra accomodation.

    The rear doors had to be removed before used for dropping and deflectors fitted to the sides of the opening thus left! Not an easy task in inclement weather.

    RAY

    in reply to: Twin boom cargo aircraft #1181716
    super sioux
    Participant

    There have been a number of twin boom cargo aircraft – the Argosy, the C-82, C-119 plus designs that never got off the drawing board.

    Why was this arrangement used for these designs over the now usual fuselage mounted tail?

    Heres a good answer! Fuselage mounted tails were not developed to leave a rear entrance until the fifties so the above mentioned aircraft were easier to load/unload and parachute cargo and paratroopers from. The high wing mounted engines were out of the way of debris on rough field operations.
    Ray

    in reply to: Hastings MOGCB at Changi in 1962 #1200470
    super sioux
    Participant

    I used the position to have a break, on an airframe afterflight inspection at RAF Nicosia in the early sixties. This position was used for dropping life saving equipment mounted beneath the wings just like a bomb aimer would have done in a Lanc etc.
    Ray

    in reply to: "Airline" TV Series (2005 zombie thread) #1208992
    super sioux
    Participant

    Lockheed Constellation

    IIRC it was a novel taken from the scripts, there was another “Ruskins Berlin” which I think was planned for the second series and how our man Jack started to make his fortune in the Berlin airlift.

    A Lockheed Constellation was purchased for the second series, which was cancelled by a technicians strike at ITV! I think the aircraft is in the IWM collection.

    in reply to: Seeking info on Airwork Services #1214098
    super sioux
    Participant

    Nicosia and Wymeswold

    Airwork was responsible for the delivery of Gannet AS4’s to the Indonesian Navy. I photographed AS11-12, 13-14 and 15-16 going through RAF Changi, Singapore in 1961. They were delivered in pairs spaced apart by a few months each.
    Here’s AS11 – 12 and AS15.

    I remember the Indoenesian Gannets saw them at RAF Nicosia where I served at the TASF (Transit Aircraft Servicing Flight). Far as I can remember Airwork were not being used at our camp so I think they were handled by us.
    When doing crash guard at RAF Wymeswold on a JP from RAF Syerston where I was based in 1963 I discovered Airwork were using a hangar for some type of civvy work. Outside was an ex RAF Handley Page Marathon looking rather sorry for its self, with deflated tyres and grubby appearance. Airwork had done a good job fitting extra fuel tanks in the passenger cabin for its new owners in Canada, a missionary outfit! But there was no way to carry enough oil for the trip so there it stayed. Airwork seem to have had their fingers in many a different pie over the years and maybe all the info. can be found one day. Ray

    in reply to: 2008 Anniversaries #1166989
    super sioux
    Participant

    FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF RAF

    We had a whopping RAF celebration at Abingdon in 1968 – both HM the Queen and myself (a humble Sergeant Technician) were there – and I have photos to prove it! At least one other Forum member was there too, and his pictures are much better than mine!

    Hi Papa Lima, I found this thread when trying to find certain info. about the North American Savage and on reading my way through it found this entry. I too was in the RAF in 1968 in the lowly rank of Junior Technician (airframes) and was part of the team keeping the Ruskies at bay with the **** Lightning.
    As part of the celebration we and other Lightning users gathered many Lightnings together at Wattisham for, I think, the Queens do at Abingdon and it was a noisy send off.. Photo taking at this camp was frowned on, so no visual memories . Have you any shots of the Lightnings at Abingdon that day?
    If so could you PLEASE show them on the site or send a personal message.
    Ray:D

    in reply to: Eurofighter is Typhoon, TSR-2 was…. #1180420
    super sioux
    Participant

    Idle enquiry…

    did anyone get around to officially/unofficially naming the TSR-2 before it was axed?

    Cheers

    Seb

    The only TSR 2 I know with a name was the Fairey Swordfish! 😀
    Ray

    in reply to: Name that plane! #1184808
    super sioux
    Participant

    Ercoupe or not Ercoupe?

    😀

    Lovely looking machine. I’ve also seen both Aircoupe and Ercoupe used – that maybe something to do with the different companies that produced the design (how many were there beside Alon?).

    I suspect it has a following this side of the pond as it’s looks fought off the resistance to American “spam-cans” (Cessnas and Pipers) that invaded our shore/killed off our light aircraft industry in the 1960s.

    Roger Smith.

    According to my favourite source ‘THE ILLUSTRATED ENCYCLOPEADIA OF AIRCRAFT’ the aircraft was designed by the Engineering and Research Corporation founded in 1930! First constructed in 1937! All construction of the Ercoupe was stopped by the outbreak of WW2.
    After the end of the war a further 6000 were made under the names Aircoupe, Ercoupe and Fornair! All rights were acquired by a new company Alon Inc. on the last day of 1963, their new all metal version was first flown on 24 October 1964 and marketed as the Alon Model A-2 Aircoupe which could use the original two-! Or three – control system. It was in production until Alon merged with Mooney Aircraft Inc. in 1967.
    It was around for a long time, in fact as Chris’s photo proves is still going strong. I first knew about the Ercoupe from a KEIL KRAFT balsa and paper flying model in the early fifties.Ray 😀

    in reply to: So you think you know your aviation history! #1205399
    super sioux
    Participant

    Thanks to Google I found the site ‘Cocarde- Les Avions which introduced me to the Bleriot Gyroplane No. 2 which flew on 17/09/1908 but does not state where in France!
    Ray

    in reply to: So you think you know your aviation history! #1205429
    super sioux
    Participant

    Having had a good look through my books, the nearest I can get to an answer is a first for aviation, the death of the the first pilot in a flying accident who was Eugne Lebvre on 7th September 1909! He was testing a French-built Wright biplane somewhere in France.
    Ray

    in reply to: Alaparma Baldo 75 #1207378
    super sioux
    Participant

    Some info. on the Alparma 75

    I-DOND
    http://www.aviastar.org/air/italy/alaparma_baldo.php

    Go to the site in the quote above where I have entered some details of interest.
    Ray

    in reply to: The absolutely WORST aircraft of all time, evar? #2478623
    super sioux
    Participant

    Potez 75 an aircraft that showed the future of ground attack

    One piece of information in an earlier answer stated something that I knew to be wrong i.e that the pilot was in the front. The observer was in that position! My source was ‘Aircraft Annual 1958’ edited by John WR Taylor. An article by Air Marshall Sir Robert Saundby entitled ‘The Future of Airpower’ with the only illustratian being of a Potez 75 which it states as being ideal for ground attack in a local war armed with missiles, rockets and machineguns.
    Ray

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 255 total)