dark light

Shadow1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 1,862 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF MCRA : Mirage-2005/9 vs MIG-29SMT #2619322
    Shadow1
    Participant

    I read a statement which explained that the IAF was interested in buying Qatar’s small fleet of Mirage 2000-5 and that a deal was nearing completion. As well India’s air arm is supposedly interested in contracting Dassault for a further 125 Mirages to replace other aircraft which need to be retired soon (I imagine these would be the Mig-21s). However, the statement also said that the Indian government wanted the IAF to look at other jets, not just the Mirage 2000.

    in reply to: Predictions for the 2005 #2619344
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Hey man I like JSF very much plz dont predict about JSF like that!! 😮

    Lava, I don’t want to disappoint you but it seems that nothing is safe from the axe yielded by the US government.

    in reply to: Predictions for the 2005 #2619779
    Shadow1
    Participant

    These are my predictions for 2005!
    1.Singapore will select the Rafale!
    2.India will buy more Mirage 2000-5Mk2.
    3.Saudi Arabia will buy a European aircraft (probably the Eurofighter) to replace its ageing fleet of F-5s.
    4.The US government will rethink the JSF program and shrink the acquisation program.
    5.The US government will given new life to the Comanche helicopter only to cancel it a second time.

    in reply to: JA 37 Viggen retirement air-to-air photos #2619810
    Shadow1
    Participant

    I unfortunately have never seen a Viggen in flight but I have heard that it is a fan favorite because of its raw power. Here’s a few links to commemorate a great bird!
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/389548/L/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/375053/M/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/739958/L/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/377751/L/

    Enjoy!

    in reply to: That FB-22 thing … #2619866
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Will the USAF really need an aircraft such as the FB-22 considering the fact that virtually every platform has the ability to carry PGMs into combat? I think the US government has squandered enough funds in the last decade without having to waste more on an aircraft it may not really need!

    in reply to: Stealth Ships #2064062
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Out of curiosity, what happened to the USS Sea Shadow and the vessel seen in the James Bond flick Tomorrow Never Dies?

    Shadow1
    Participant

    I have followed the events in Iraq with great interest since it 1990 and I must say that a lot has happened since. That Saddam Hussein needed to be removed from power was something that needed to be done. Whether now or later, for such actions, there never really is a right time to do it. Is Iraq better off, in the long run, I have absolutely no doubt of that fact. At this time however, American forces and their allies need to have complete freedom to hunt the likes of Zarkawi and his people.
    It seems that the Iraqi populations are leaving in fear of Iraq’s insurgent groups and I can’t say that I blame them. However, the quicker they begin sharing information, the quicker this situation could reach an end.

    in reply to: Target Iran: scenarios, policies and speculation playground. #2622895
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Shadow:

    I said the U.S. has trouble stomping out guerillas. Saddam made the mistake of trying to fight a conventional war with us. Twice. I think he wasn’t reading the right books.

    I don’t think that he was reading any books. I sometimes wonder if the man knew how to read. I do sincerely think that the United States military and government made a mistake thinking that they could so easily walk into Iraq and hold control. I don’t think anyone would have ever thought that such an insurgency uprising would create such a problem.

    in reply to: RIAT Sunday Photos #2623484
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Brilliant shots all around, especially the first one, the F-16 banking right. You’ve outdone yourself!

    Shadow1
    Participant

    This is the flaw in the reasoning of so many second rate powers. They see the U.S. having trouble stamping out guerillas, and then they assume we’re weaker than we look.
    So they try to engage on a conventional level, and they get stomped.

    Saddam would still be in power today if he hadn’t decided that the U.S. didn’t like taking casualties and so could be defied on a conventional battlefield.

    On a conventional level, most countries would be stupid to engage American forces in any type of conflict. However, as far as a guerilla war is concerned, I am sorry but I see the insurgency in Iraq lasting far longer than everyone thinks. And if the US military is so strong in stamping out guerilla forces, why is it that they are still hunting Osama Ben Laden and his group of cohorts. There have been to many setbacks, too many lives taken by these Muslim religious fanatics and it is taking the fight out of American forces.

    in reply to: Pakistan News and Discussion thread #2627551
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Just a quick question! Wouldn’t China be a much more direct threat to India rather than Pakistan?

    Shadow1
    Participant

    The real question that needs to be asked is can the US military handle a full scale conflict with a foe which hasn’t been weakened in the past like Iraq had been during the course of twelve years. The Iranian government has had the time to bolter its military while everyone’s focus was aimed at Saddam Hussein which could make it a potentially dangerous enemy for US forces.
    Moral in Iraq seems to be at an all time low with troops struggling to comprehend why they are there and why it is that their safety is constantly put on the line by insurgents. I am sorry to say that a military power, which has been vaunted the world over, should have made quick work of these pesky guerilla fighters. I hope that the US government will eventually realize that it needs to get rid of Donald Rumsfeld who has been nothing but an absolute thorn in the US Defense Department side. The US military which is operating in the Middle East today isn’t the same as the one which crushed one of the largest armies in the world in 1991. The only reason, to me, seems to be that Rumsfeld’s ego got in the way of what really needed to be done.
    Should Iran decide to attack American forces in the Middle East, it will be very hard for them to organize an effective counterattack as they have, in the last few weeks, experienced a shortage of parts and personnal equipment, amongst other things. The simple fact that a soldier asked the Defense Secretary, even if he had to be asked to do it, why it was that they hadn’t received the equipment they needed to fight the enemy spoke volume of the state of what really might be going on in Iraq. The way Rumsfeld handled the answer was so pathetic, I couldn’t believe such a man was at the head of this once proud organization. Iran would have the upper hand until a time that the US can organize a counterattack, at which point, the balance would swing back in the favor of the United States. It probably wouldn’t take very long for this to happen but at the cost of how many lives!
    The point I’m trying to make is rather than starting to focus on Iran, the United States should worry about finishing the job it has started in Iraq and allow the world community to see if a peaceful agreement can be reached.

    in reply to: Merry Xmas #2627588
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Merry Christmas to all! Best wishes on the upcoming New Year!

    in reply to: Osirak questions #2633565
    Shadow1
    Participant

    Combat Aircraft Sept. 2004 had a great article on this operation. Could be a good source of information for you.

    in reply to: If you were a JSF user, what would your other aircraft be? #2634462
    Shadow1
    Participant

    F-18, I don’t know that one would want to align Gripens next to JSF. The JAS-39 is known to have short legs which would restrict its time in the air completing its assignments. As much as it could be a good platform for short-range defenses, I would rather spend my budget on the Rafale to, as I stated, supplement my F-35s.
    On the other hand, selecting any Flanker variant would be a good choice as they are known to have the endurance needed to complete such tasks. It is unfortunate that Sukhoi’s venerable fighter hasn’t found more takers. Cheers!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,771 through 1,785 (of 1,862 total)