dark light

D1566

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1161139
    D1566
    Participant

    The other photo I’m sure are of Mosquitos, why would they be at a R.N . station?

    Interesting photos; what is the machine that can be see below the nose of the nearest Mosquito? Sea Fury?

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1161517
    D1566
    Participant

    If its the VARSITY, the shape of the cowlings look right, then it will be WF425 from Duxford

    Presumably it had been preserved at one point? – what happened?

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1161711
    D1566
    Participant

    Think you could be right – thanks.

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1161750
    D1566
    Participant

    Great photos – thanks for sharing them. What is/are the radial engined remains and u/c in the background of the 3rd photo?

    in reply to: HMS Victory found! #1161817
    D1566
    Participant

    Closer to 400ft

    in reply to: HMS Victory found! #1161845
    D1566
    Participant

    Hello.
    just a quicky How Deep is the english channell. from dover to scilly isles.
    terry

    45M sinking to 120M approx maximums, but obviously there are major variations. Google Earth may give you some idea of the topography – (I cannot access it here at work!)

    in reply to: Accidental shoot downs over irish sea in ww2 #1162515
    D1566
    Participant

    No problem, I thought that the original query was regarding ‘friendly fire’ incidents.

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1162518
    D1566
    Participant

    ‘We’ is not ignoring anything.
    Compared with Hawker and the HS group, Vickers Supermarine had smaller departments.

    Well at least its moved from being Supermarine to being Vickers Supermarine now, thats some progress!:D Maybe V-S did have more on their plates at the time than H-S but is it a real reason for the Swifts apparent second place?

    in reply to: First combat victory using AI in July 1940. #1162662
    D1566
    Participant

    It seems to have been discussed here and that a copy of the combat report may be available.

    in reply to: Accidental shoot downs over irish sea in ww2 #1162664
    D1566
    Participant

    G-ACPY, Dh.84 Dragon was shot down 3/6/41 in the Atlantic.:)
    http://www.planecrashinfo.com/1941/1941-9.htm

    Wasn’t that more of a deliberate shoot down?

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1162666
    D1566
    Participant

    The limitations within Supermarine were small design, development, and manufacturing depts. This would effect the descission to start again with the Swift design.

    Yet again we seem to be ignoring the fact that they were part of a big company which did not have all those limitations.

    I’ve often wondered, what is the reality of the Hunter being an excellent fighter?
    Its close support and ground attack history is excellent, but was it the superb pure day fighter that we often here?

    Where was it tested as a day fighter; India vs. Pakistan, Jordan vs. Israel? It did not particularly excel in either conflict, though that may have been down to other factors?

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1162902
    D1566
    Participant

    If I recall correctly a lot of the planned production run of Swifts was to be carried out by Shorts in Belfast – indicating production limitations for Supermarine.

    But also indicating that there was a potential solution to production limitations for the Swift at Supermarines, so that cannot really be said to be a reason why it was not produced in quantity.

    in reply to: Defiant footage #1162960
    D1566
    Participant

    Slight topic drift and apologies if I have missed it elsewhere, but has the Fairey Battle had its transport damage rectified yet?

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1163000
    D1566
    Participant

    I still find it hard to believe that a company the size of Vickers, despite ongoing Valiant and airliner work (presume we are talking Viscount/Vanguard/early VC10 development?), would have not put their full weight behind a project that could have (potentially) delivered several hundred aircraft ……

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1163084
    D1566
    Participant

    It also seems the Supermarine were well on the back foot when it came to design and manufacturing capacity by the mid fifties.

    Were they not still part of Vickers at the time? Surely if so the resources would have been available, if required?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,720 total)