dark light

D1566

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 1,720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1165600
    D1566
    Participant

    Mid ’60s would match the release date for ‘The Blue Max’ (1966) if that was indeed the catalyst for the clear up?

    in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1165633
    D1566
    Participant

    Thanks for that – roughly when did the Seafire scrappings take place?

    in reply to: Spitfire Gate Guards #1165730
    D1566
    Participant

    Didn’t a number of Spitfires/Seafires survive quite late in Eire? I seem to remember photos in AM many years back and a statement that they had been scrapped to clearup/make way for filming, possibly ‘The Blue Max’ ?

    in reply to: Thin but robust provenance #1166348
    D1566
    Participant

    In theory the car world adopts similar practices although there are some cars around with rather dicey provenances and there are currently debates about some cars which acheive lap speeds far over those possible in their heyday thanks to modern bits inside old engines ( a practice which shouldn’t, in my view, be allowed where the sole aim of the new bits is to increase power output to the huge detriment of originality) but having said that there is rather less chance of someone recovering the remains of a long lost Ferrari or Jaguar D type from the Russian tundra or the bottom of a lake so maybe the car owners have an easier time monitoring the provenance of their pride and joy..

    There are still some remarkable ‘Barn finds’ happening in the classic car world:

    Lagonda

    Bugatti

    hidden collection

    The Bugatti in particular is probably the equivalent of finding an unknown Supermarine Schneider racer given the numbers built?

    in reply to: Lancaster Wreckage ID Requested #1166789
    D1566
    Participant

    Hello Dieter, interesting pictures. The second photo stainless steel section is the bar the rudder pedals hang from rather than undercarriage. No idea on the other bits. Do you have details of the crew? Thanks for posting.

    Interesting photos – It seems to have been a very new aircraft, lost on its first mission.
    http://www.lostbombers.co.uk/bomber.php?id=3947

    in reply to: Seafire F.Mk 46 LA546, repeat LA546 #1169666
    D1566
    Participant

    Could make for an interesting line-up at an airshow one day!

    in reply to: To excavate or not to excavate……. #1170882
    D1566
    Participant

    Out of interest; would the county archaeologist have any input if you just wanted to dig a hole 20x20x20ft that DID NOT contain the remains of a Hawker Tempest? (Or whatever)

    in reply to: Spitfire Survivors list – 1960 #1189370
    D1566
    Participant

    Would Mk XVI’s have been much use for spares supply for the THUM PR XIX’s?

    in reply to: Spitfire Survivors list – 1960 #1189759
    D1566
    Participant

    Much appreciate the updates – fascinating, thanks. I presume that ‘Lost’ covers a multitude of fates?

    in reply to: Spitfire Survivors list – 1960 #1190099
    D1566
    Participant

    I can see a few identities that were later revised and a couple that have since been scrapped

    Could someone please identify the changes/losses for those of us not in the know?

    in reply to: What type is this WWI biplane? #1201016
    D1566
    Participant

    Bristol F2B

    D1566
    Participant

    Welcome!
    A good place to start researching might be the RAF Museum website:

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/bob1940/roll.html

    in reply to: Post-War Aircraft Disposal (Dump/Landfill) #1219590
    D1566
    Participant

    but also some V-12 Liberty aircraft engines of WW1 vintage.

    The Liberty engine (licence built in the UK) was used in the ‘Crusader’ cruiser tanks – apparently it was thoroughly unreliable as it was unable to cope with the rigours of off road use and used to leak coolant everywhere.

    in reply to: Cotswolds Aircraft Restoration Group (CARG) Innsworth #1220088
    D1566
    Participant

    How did the cockpit section survive?

    in reply to: Worst British aircraft of W.W.II #1220343
    D1566
    Participant

    And, (mentioned earlier) has to be the Saro Lerwick. It was a very bad aeroplane, nasty, with no redeeming features whatever. And useless.

    Have to agree with this, the Lerwick must have been the worst, not only as a poor aeroplane, but also from a value for money point of view as they seem to have been rarely available for service (wasn’t it once said that the Germans never did it the disservice of engaging one in combat?). At least the Botha saw some use giving trainee aircrew some experience – even if it did fall out of the sky with depressng regularity. Defiants, Barracudas, Battles etc all shine in comparison with the Lerwick.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 1,720 total)