dark light

D1566

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lucky Find! Weird Coincidence?! #932386
    D1566
    Participant

    Nice one πŸ™‚

    D1566
    Participant

    Great photo!
    From http://www.ab-ix.co.uk/oo-stirling.pdf

    c/n SH1536
    PK181 DD 45 No RAF service recorded
    DD 45 No.273 MU Polebrook, Northants
    BT25. 8.47 DD28. 8.47 Airtech Ltd, Thame. (PHOTO)
    Test flown 28.8.47 at Polebrook
    OO-XAE DD29. 8.47 RD 3.11.47 (CofR No 738) Air Transport Co SA, Melsbroek
    (Sold by β€œTransair” to the above)
    Flown 21.4.48 to Shanghai, arriving 9.5.48 returned to Brussels with 29 passengers. On 27.7.48 left Blackbushe for Castel Benito and Cairo (Farouk Field, arriving 28.7.48 on 29.7.48 noted training Egyptian crews.
    Canx 2.10.48 as sold to Tangiers Trading Cy
    (for delivery to Egypt AF)

    in reply to: Spitfire MK1 or MK11 replicas #933578
    D1566
    Participant

    All well and good providing that the OP is fully aware of the various nuances. Allowances should be made for people with less detailed knowledge.

    in reply to: ATA Pilots Getting Home #933601
    D1566
    Participant

    … and Stinson Reliants too.

    in reply to: Ju 88 Fuselage #933693
    D1566
    Participant

    Enough to start a rebuild to airworthy πŸ™‚ Good work!

    in reply to: Spitfire MK1 or MK11 replicas #933694
    D1566
    Participant

    Does any one know of the whereabouts of a Spitfire MK1 or MK11 that has a complete cockpit in either private hands or a museum in the UK. Presumably a replica as I don’t think there are any originals around or are there?
    Many thanks

    There are plenty of early mark Spitfires around, are you specifically looking for a replica cockpit section?

    in reply to: Ju 88 Fuselage #934665
    D1566
    Participant

    Nice piece, appreciate you showing us.

    in reply to: Moggy injured in flying accident 31/3/14 #935021
    D1566
    Participant

    All the best for a swift recovery, hope nothing was too badly bent!

    in reply to: 70 years ago tonight – Nuremberg Raid #935953
    D1566
    Participant

    Steve,, since I live in the USA the odds of me seeing that programme anytime in the near future are pretty slim, to none. With the night fighter score being so high I would assume a full moon and a cloudless night, care to be a little more specific?

    That plus ineffective diversionary raids, lower than normal contrail levels, probably other reasons too.

    D1566
    Participant

    Was this not the reason Air Atlantique could not continue with their DC 3 passenger operations because of changes and EASA regulations that meant daft things like the aircraft would need escape slides and oxygen.Totaly daft I know but I think this was the issue that the DC3 fell into unfortunately.

    Mike E

    If I remember correctly it was intimated that derogation could be available but Air Atlantique chose not to persue it.

    in reply to: Halifax HR980 #938275
    D1566
    Participant

    Thanks for highlighting that, one to follow.

    in reply to: VC10 question #938708
    D1566
    Participant

    Convair 990 621 mph, VC10 580mph according to wiki. But also;

    The performance of the VC10 was such that it achieved the fastest London to New York crossing of the Atlantic by a jet airliner, a record still held to date for a sub-sonic airliner; only the supersonic Concorde was faster

    in reply to: Air Commodore Jack Holmes – RIP #939877
    D1566
    Participant

    Remarkable, RIP.

    in reply to: Hawker Survivors book idea #939879
    D1566
    Participant

    Cees’ point is a good one…substantial relics treated as well–perhaps as an appendix. That Hurricane hulk at Hendon comes to mind, as do some major bits that have remained here in Canada.

    Some of the survivors listed in the Spitfire books seem to be little more than a firewall and an identity.

    in reply to: Seafire SX336 #940852
    D1566
    Participant

    Not sure why you got hassle for asking. She is coming along fine. Never as quick as we would like, mainly from distractions of other work, but structural work pretty much complete. Still a fair bit of re-asembly to do but on schedule to fly by year end.

    Is there any further news on the return of SX336? πŸ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,720 total)