Don’t think I would be of any help but I would buy it.

To be honest nothing beyond what a quick google will bring up;

http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=72914

http://www.aviationarchaeology.org.uk/marg/crashes1944.htm

Photos of course!

Plenty of photos if you google ‘Spitfire RN135’

In slide 2 the 4 prop nose-on with a white nose I take to be an IL-18, likely Malev?

Also in the same slide, upper LH side, side on? Is that what has been described as a Constellation?

To me this looks to be a quick change standard ‘Power-Plant assembly’ – engine, bearer, accessories, dedicated cowlings etc.

Perhaps best not to anticipate the bit it hangs on.

A remarkable survivor either way.

Well that has told you lot.

Moggy

I’m feeling the love 😀

if iam not wrong , the bear cat turn as good as the zero

I don’t think that was ever put to the test in a combat situation. I doubt that the F8F could turn with a Zero at lower speeds.

Sopwith Camels and other bi-plane was later replaced by mono plane

But it did combat, with great success, various Albatros and Fokker Biplanes with considerably higher maximum speed.

Hawker Hurricanes is no way as good as Fw-190D , P-51B or Spitfire , it not a failure but it only doing alright

The Hurricane fought against faster Bf109s/110s during the Battle of Britain, very effectively.

Folland Gnats have quite the same speed as other aircraft of it’s time like f-86 , it not slow for it’s time at all

Try comparing it’s speed with the F-104s that it met in the India/Pakistan wars.

BAE Sea Harriers strength vertical take off and landing and in it’s time we already have missiles with speed of mach 3-4 and radar to attack BVR so speed become alot lest important ( however it still not as successful as supersonic fighter like f-15 or f-16

The SHAR was still substantially slower (which was your point) than the Argentine Mirages and Daggers that it met during the Falklands War, and which it defeated in 100% of resolved combats between them. It also fared well in mock combats with the F-15 (Sharkey Wards Book references this if I remember correctly)

but still it better to have aircraft with better performance , a zero trying to fight a bear cat will pretty much end up being shot down

Theoretically the Zero could keep turning out of trouble until the Bearcat ran out of fuel or the pilot went home for his tea.
If your contention was correct; Sopwith Camels, Hawker Hurricanes, Folland Gnats/Ajeets, BAE Sea Harriers etc (to quote but a few British examples, other nations combat aircraft are available too) would all have been abject failures in combat.