dark light

D1566

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What was the best post-WW II fighter ? #944344
    D1566
    Participant

    what i mean is more agile fighter dont really have tactic to reply when faster air plane use boom and zoom attack , even if they do , it still seem that the faster fighter have advantage

    The large number of times that slower aircraft have routinely bettered faster ones throughout air combat history would tend to imply that tactics are more important than outright performance.

    in reply to: What was the best post-WW II fighter ? #944424
    D1566
    Participant

    so what tactic that agile aircraft like zero or Supermarine can use to defense again faster opponent like hell cat or Ta-152
    isn’t the fact that we changing from tri plane to bi plane and to mono plane , and also from piston to jet engine show that speed more important than maneuver ?

    If you can coerce the enemy into combat on your terms, speed only gives him the choice of whether to accept or not. There are many occasions where the faster aircraft has not triumphed.

    in reply to: What was the best post-WW II fighter ? #944438
    D1566
    Participant

    what i mean is some characteristics seem to be more important than other Ex : hell cat vs zero prove that speed is more important than turn rate ?

    Not necessarily, it is more an indication of matching tactics to available performance and the combat situation. There have been several occasions where manoeverability has been of more importance than sheer speed.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Images #945453
    D1566
    Participant

    And is that a lucky horseshoe hanging up in the cockpit?

    Wrong way up if it is 🙂

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Images #945915
    D1566
    Participant

    … and what happens when someone makes a change to a photo, such as tinting, or colourisation; does it then become a new image and the copyright/property of the person making the change?

    in reply to: B-17 with turboprop engine #949136
    D1566
    Participant

    One of them became ‘Liberty Bell’, but sadly lost in an accident recently.

    in reply to: Why the Supermarine Scimitar was rarely mentioned? #950834
    D1566
    Participant

    Were they used to attack the ‘Torrey Canyon’ or was that left to Buccs?

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Images #953318
    D1566
    Participant

    Note that one of those WAAF’s has an impressive row of medals, that has to be reasonably rare. I wonder if perhaps some of them are Army nurses rather than WAAF’s and she might be a WWI retread? Or if they are WAAF’s perhaps she’s Queen Bee?

    Looks like army uniform to me, check the shirt and tie. Some impressive scrambled egg on the hat of the officer leaning in from the far side?

    in reply to: Blenheim gun pack – easy to change role? #953641
    D1566
    Participant

    Presumably this just applied to these two squadrons?

    in reply to: Launch of our Beaufort Restoration Project #954281
    D1566
    Participant

    That would be the one. as per the history of the aircraft :

    A9-13 was originally built to an RAF order of 180 aircraft and was delivered as RAF serial number T9552 in January 1942 and was one of 20 Australian Beauforts delivered to 100 Squadron RAF which operated at Richmond NSW.

    Thanks, and good luck with the restoration.

    in reply to: Launch of our Beaufort Restoration Project #954519
    D1566
    Participant

    All the best with the project. Is this the airframe that includes substantial Filton-built sections?

    in reply to: New Rudolph Hess Me110 theory.. #954528
    D1566
    Participant

    So how do we explain the ‘brass nut’ (presumably) blanking-off the auxiliary oil tank pipe?

    Could it have been fitted by an RAF ‘erk’ or even a museum curator to stop an annoying drip of oil from an open pipe?

    in reply to: Are These Aircraft Parts I Have Found? #955029
    D1566
    Participant

    the silver circle thing you photographed I found that last week, I couldnt carry anymore so I left it .-) also that yellow cylinder I found ages ago too and didn’t bother with it, I dont think its aircraft related. I found an aviation pipe connector thing at that same spot but I accidently dropped it, if you find it I hope you take a photo of it .-)

    good pics thanks for sharing

    I am not so sure about the cylinder; it is very light, even allowing for corrosion. If it were marine or industrial I think it would have been much heavier? That said it could be off a lorry.

    in reply to: Are These Aircraft Parts I Have Found? #955224
    D1566
    Participant

    I was back there myself again today, pickings were a bit thinner on the ground. I did spot this fastening; looks possibly aviation related:
    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3229/13040104075_52fb5bf684.jpg
    Moray-20140309-00658 by martinperry77, on Flickr
    There was also a small aluminium data plate next to it:
    http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2349/13040273473_0f7746b4d2.jpg
    IMG-20140309-00676 by martinperry77, on Flickr
    Number on it appears to read ‘G0025482’
    The rest of the bits spotted can be viewed here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/88888327@N03/sets/72157642110222693/
    Am not particularly convinced that they are all aviation related.

    in reply to: Buccaneer on the move #955227
    D1566
    Participant

    XW530 today;
    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7395/13040482584_7f58a4f171.jpg
    Moray-20140309-00653 by martinperry77, on Flickr

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,720 total)