I have just finished reading ‘The Last Torpedo Flyers’ by Arthur Aldridge, excellent book. Well worth looking out for, I found it heavily discounted in one of the clearance book shops, which seems a shame in some ways, as it is presumably the sign of slow mainstream sales? Perhaps he should have had a picture of a Spitfire on the cover, instead of a Beaufort? 😀
I am just about to start reading ‘Spying for Hitler, the Welsh Double-Cross’ by John Humphries.
I have just finished reading ‘The Last Torpedo Flyers’ by Arthur Aldridge, excellent book. Well worth looking out for, I found it heavily discounted in one of the clearance book shops, which seems a shame in some ways, as it is presumably the sign of slow mainstream sales? Perhaps he should have had a picture of a Spitfire on the cover, instead of a Beaufort? 😀
I am just about to start reading ‘Spying for Hitler, the Welsh Double-Cross’ by John Humphries.
What a great day all round 🙂
Second photo is a Fw190, first may be a Ju88?
Unless they were all duds 10 hits from a 20mm cannon would have blown the wing off with such a tight grouping.
Your ‘ballistic experts’ need to give their head a shake!
… and the steadiness of the gun platform they were fired from must have been phenominal … almost as if it was standing on the ground 😀
As others on here have commented (+on previous threads) RAFM do seem very keen to have authentic markings on some aircraft whilst others are blatantly incorrectly marked and in the wrong part of the museum to be historically accurate.
Some a/c look great in trainer/target tug colours…others less so… but unless one has unlimited funding then museums do have to use the closest a/c type as a representation of that type.
Since very few people will have access to the inside of RAFM a/c then the interior configuration matters not vis a vis nav gear/radio fits etc
All undoubtedly true, I just don’t subscribe to the conspiracy theory that the change is down to ‘political correctness’, as implied by others.
Interestingly this account also states that this Puma received ‘around 600 hits’ from the rifles and machine-guns of the Royal Marines defending South Georgia.
… which may explain why they didn’t hope to recover it later?
It’s good to know that someone still persues these issues, keep up the pressure on them please!
The de-militarising of it, removing any offensive capability that might upset the wowsers in the removing of its turret and making it a navigation trainer. I wouldn’t mind so much if it was painted as a wartime OTU aircraft, their Wellingtons trained crews AND flew ops.
What I was wondering is where you picked up the idea that the motive behind the change was some sort of appeasement process rather than just a wish to exhibit the aircraft as a training machine per se.
It just seems to me that taking this aircraft away from representing a wartime Bomber Command aircraft is yet another of these revisionist, apologist moves to appease the vocal minority who think Bomber Command were evil.
I’m not sure where you are picking up that motive for changing this aircraft back to its trainer configuration?
An amazing story. RIP.
No doubt the reason it’s taken 70 years to shift is that someone was going to move it “dreckly”!
:D:D:D
According to Wikipedia, 2 of the 4 Disney B-29s were destroyed at the time.

image by martinperry77, on Flickr
Some light reading for this afternoons flight to Singapore arrived just in time, hope BA don’t have a fit about the weight! 🙂
Thanks for that, yes I have. I’m just saddened that I can’t find any official records. I’ll keep looking. I just don’t want his name or memory to fade. A fine pilot with 30 confirmed kills and 3 shared has to have recognition.
Percy
I gather that the reason for the lack of records is that so much was lost during the evacuation of Greece in 1941, the same reason that Pattles record of victories is never officially recognised?