RE: easyJet and Go
The easyLand chap is wrong Andrew – it is a takeover, as EZY are acquiring 80% of the share capital of Go.
I think what he meant was that they were “merging operations”. Ie. the marketing spin is that two great airlines are combining their operational strengths.
RE: easyJet and Go
GoEasy?
No – I think it will still be Easyjet. Companies do not normally rebrand just because they buy a competitor.
RE: News flash!!!
Easyjet are acquiring 3I’s stake in Go – it is therefore a straightforward acquisition rather than a merger.
RE: Kosovo
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 02-05-02 AT 10:24 PM (GMT)]Quite a silly little article in general. Some interesting points though:
1. The “west” could have sorted the situation out if they really wanted to badly. I mean, Tito did. Whether or not they have the right to do so – that’s another question entirely.
2. The USE is an embryonic reality. Don’t discount it. Every decision taken in Brussels and Strasbourg is designed to bring closer integration (official EU line). There is already a common market and a common currency – immigration and tax are definitely on the agenda too! Defence is a prickly argument but there’s no denying that it is on the Commission’s wish list.
PS – Geforce:
The Kurd issue is not the only and probably not the major issue preventing Turkish EU membership. Consider:
1. Not a 1st world country – poor, underdeveloped.
2. Ridiculous conflict with Greece, esp. over Cyprus. Remember that Greece is already a member!
3. Terrible human rights record.
4. In a virtual state of civil war in the eastern provinces.
5. Lack of western european sympathies. The Galatasaray murders were the tip of the iceberg in my opinion.
6. For gods sake – it isn’t even in Europe apart from a disrict of Istanbul!
7. Controversial point – every other EU member (actual or prospective) is a Christian state. Turkey isn’t.
8. The issue of EU territorial integrity. Turkey’s eastern borders are very porous which would be the death knell to an EU-wide immigration policy.
Turkey won’t join at all – they don’t stand a chance.
RE: Airline Names
I’d operate an all J41 fleet from – Sheffield!
I don’t like the J41 very much as a passenger but they look fairly cheap.
I’d go for a 1-1 abreast biz class layout with nice legroom on sectors over 1 hour – JER, SOU, AMS, LCY initially.
Hopefully progress to Dornier 328’s.
RE: Quiz : Air Disasters
SAS aircraft was an MD-80 series I think.
RE: My Apologies
Well said.
I too, feel that I have tended to be a bit more anti-Israeli than I intended. Perhaps I suffer from the typical British habit of always supporting the underdog.
As Keltic very correctly said, most such issues are some shade of grey rather than black and white.
RE: Sheffield Disaster!!!!
I think it was originally designed as a STOLport a la London City.
Never seemed a very good idea to me – Sheffield doesn’t exactly have the same draw as a London!
The future would seem to lie in feeder services – LHR, LGW, AMS, CDG and DUB.
Seems very odd to me that whereas the govt always bleats about a lack of runway capacity in the South East, the North has under used airports!
RE: MyTravel/Airtours to enter scheduled lowcost a
Well I haven’t really used charter airlines for the best part of a decade so you’re probably right about schedules not being as bad as I remember.
I just vividly remember waiting outside hell holes of airports at 4 AM for a flight back – Kos airport springs to mind! I don’t really associate that with scheduled flights, is all I really meant.
I’m not saying that I’m right – my first paragraph makes that point. But I reckon a lot of people have the same (possible) misconception as me, because things used to be very bad in the 80s and early 90s.
RE: MyTravel/Airtours to enter scheduled lowcost a
But as the article points out, charter airlines often fly from regional airports and honestly, a lot seem to go at really unsociable hours.
Also I would expect flights to operate mostly to the Med; I imagine that scheduled ops will be an “addition” to travel co. contracts.
The article is also correct to point out the dreadful reputation of charter airlines – not just for delays but also comfort levels and schedules. Even if things were to dramatically change, it will take a few years for the message to filter through to the travelling public.
Overall, a good idea though!
RE: Things to do at Newark International
Well imagine being stuck inside an ATP to MAN and then back again – it’s not a very passenger friendly aircraft IMHO.
RE: How many years of formal education do you rece
18 years for me, though still toying with the idea of a MBA.
RE: What makes you proud of your country?
Most of the money at the moment goes to the health service or the welfare system. All the new money is going to the health service.
Answer your question?
RE: Things to do at Newark International
Newark is a bad airport to wait at.
I remember checking in for a flight to LHR, and you had to basically walk straight to the gate area – there were some seats and a few kiosks! Terrible.
Check in was also ludicrously overcrowded and the baggage trolleys were insane – you needed to deposit a coin to use them (???!!!) but I couldn’t figure it out. What sort of crap airport inconveniences travellers like this????
Only compensation was great views from the aircraft (on the tarmac) of the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State and the WTC (this was pre 9/11 obviously).
RE: Germany
Strange how us Europeans all seem to agree on tighter gun controls whilst the Americans are 180 degrees removed….
Only generalising of course, but how much do you reckon this stems from popular culture, the media etc.. in our respective countries?