They have added a page about it under the “news” section. But it only mentions the dead crew and not the passengers.
Some of the photos are quite poor. Adds to the overall “dodginess” factor of the airline.
Leave accountants out of this though. Good ones don’t make false economies.
They have added a page about it under the “news” section. But it only mentions the dead crew and not the passengers.
Some of the photos are quite poor. Adds to the overall “dodginess” factor of the airline.
Leave accountants out of this though. Good ones don’t make false economies.
Well airlines always underplay incidents and the media always overplay them. That’s just life.
So why get upset at the media and not at the airline as well?
It was certainly poor PR to downplay the incident to the extent that they did, whilst photos of the nosecone are splashed over the papers. What they should have done was say it could have been serious, but the design of the aircraft and the ability of the pilot contributed to make sure it ended up only as a relatively minor incident. They need to give the impression (even if only the impression) of utter honesty with the media and explain the facts in a succint but convincing and balanced manner. Not just wave it all off.
Possibly, yes.
The RJ’s don’t have the same cargo capacity which means airlines can’t carry cargo on their passenger flights to enhance revenue.
This size of aircraft is a crossover point – do you go for a large regional jet or a small mainline airliner? There are lots of pros and cons each way depending on the structure of the airline in question.
If you are mainly a RJ operator (like Flybe) then you’d probably go for a large RJ – if you’re mainly a big airliner operator you might stick with a cut down mainline airliner.
Well done and congratulations.
Well done, they’re more interesting than the usual a.net stuff.
I’ve seen the green fire trainer a lot – much better than the mouldy rotten ravaged Trident they have at MAN.
The EU competition commission would only veto such a deal to be anti-British (which means they would 😡 )
Every other country is the EU has the national airline scene utterly dominated by 1 airline. They can’t very well say it’s OK for them but not for the UK.
However, the UK MMC would try to veto it.
I’d say it was competing for 717 business.
It is bigger and heavier than the 717 (less efficient), but also has better range. So it may be better suited to “long thin” routes whilst the 717 would be better for frequent short hops. The A318 also has A320 commonality whilst the 717 doesn’t have any commonality at all.
In the case of launch customers, Frontier have some long thin routes and they also have the A319/320 in their fleet, so it would be the most appropriate choice for them. Air France would buy it regardless, bring an Airbus!
Preston, how can you say the media overreacted?
It was an event that scared some people and would be of interest to many more. Therefore it is newsworthy.
The fact that the situation was not as serious as most people imagine does not detract from the newsworthiness of the story. To be fair, both The Evening Standard and the BBC pointed to the airline’s view on that so as not to cause panic.
I think you’re being too harsh on the media in this case.
Like Kabir said, I think most Russian aircraft are well made and probably would last forever. Likewise, pilots look like they have been well trained.
However, the FSU seems to have a very poor maintainence culture. Also, Russian engines appear to be sub standard. Even with the good standard of airframes and piloting, the engines and maintainence let the side down.
You are saying there is a correlation between incidents and crashes.
Therefore airlines who have more incidents are more prone to have crashes.
So what you are sayin Kabir, is that we need to look at “incidents” other than just crashes?
Ah, OK, with you. Could they start a base in Perth and fly from there instead of Singapore?
Not sure about Twickenham, but it wouldn’t surprise me as it is fairly near to Wembley. Certainly, flights into LHR used to fly over the old Wembley site and you could see a lot of detail.
Yes, but you said on an earlier post that Emirates couldn’t do UK-Australia 1 stop with currenct equipment. But SIA can, using the same aircraft?!