Ink,
You could argue that liberalism works fine in the economy, it’s just that countries shy away from it due to corruption.
The whole point of Governments is to Govern. They are self-fulfilling monstrous beaurocracies. Their raison d’etre is to invent red tape and restrictions, to introduce laws and make themselves important. The best example is the EU – those guys have wet dreams over rules and regulations governing the curvature of bananas!
So one big reason for corruption is that Governments stick their noses everywhere and make life difficult for everyone – hence bribes, to grease the wheels. As an example, if some poncey inspector comes to your shop and tells you he will close you down because your scales are calibrated in imperial not metric, you might try to pay him off. And there would be nothing wrong in trying to do that (unless you get caught ;))
So…less and smaller Government intrinsically means less corruption, all other things being equal. The trouble is, other things rarely are equal. The disparity in education and sophisticaton levels masks this effect.
At any given level of national wealth and development:
BEAUROCRACY IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO CORRUPTION.
Ink,
You could argue that liberalism works fine in the economy, it’s just that countries shy away from it due to corruption.
The whole point of Governments is to Govern. They are self-fulfilling monstrous beaurocracies. Their raison d’etre is to invent red tape and restrictions, to introduce laws and make themselves important. The best example is the EU – those guys have wet dreams over rules and regulations governing the curvature of bananas!
So one big reason for corruption is that Governments stick their noses everywhere and make life difficult for everyone – hence bribes, to grease the wheels. As an example, if some poncey inspector comes to your shop and tells you he will close you down because your scales are calibrated in imperial not metric, you might try to pay him off. And there would be nothing wrong in trying to do that (unless you get caught ;))
So…less and smaller Government intrinsically means less corruption, all other things being equal. The trouble is, other things rarely are equal. The disparity in education and sophisticaton levels masks this effect.
At any given level of national wealth and development:
BEAUROCRACY IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO CORRUPTION.
Lack of competition => image isn’t too important.
I disagree, they still have life left in them.
Concorde is all about marketing; they aren’t natural profit makers but they can have a place at the top of the range. Anyway, some of Branson’s ideas for reviving Conc make some sense. The real issue is that BA and AF both charge too much money for flights on Concorde. With a fuel (and staff and maint.) bill in the stratosphere, every seat needs to be filled.
This is achievable with a more realistic pricing policy in my opinion. There is essentially a very high level of demand for premium flights between LHR and JFK and it could be the missing link in VS’s price range. Remember, VS don’t have a First class product at the moment – Economy, Premium Economy and Business (a la Upper Class) and I think they loose out a little to BA First. Conc seats won’t compete with that in space or luxury terms, but the “Concorde effect” more than compensates.
It is the flag of the Isle of Man. If you check it, you’ll see it has a similarity to the ancient flag of Sicily (my fiancee is Sicilian-Australian, ironic or what). It is commonly known as the “Three Legs of Man”.
The authentic name is the “Triskelion” and it is accompanied by the national motto – “Quocuncue Jeceris Stabit”. I used to think the latin phrase meant “whichever way you throw me I land on my feet” but I’m not 100% sure on that. Either way, “Triskelion” is a derivation of the Greek for “Three Legged”
The Greek influence was believed to be responsible for the adoption of the Sicilian flag, which is similar except for a Medusa’s head in the centre. The Triskelion has been observed on rock-carvings in Italy.
Conversely, the Triskelion is part of Norse mythology and the Isle of Man has a population with Norse antecedents. The Vikings were the historic rulers, and they established the “Tynwald” which is our national parliament. It still runs the country today and means we can justifiably claim to be the oldest continuously existing democracy in the world.
There is a State opening of Tynwald every year. I missed last year (I was away) but King Harald of Norway opened it for us. The Queen herself is expected this year. Prince Charles opened it about 4 years ago I think (he flew over himself in his BAe 146).
Constitutionally, the Island is NOT part of the UK but is a dependent territory of the Commonwealth. As I’ve said, we have our own parliament, our own legislature, our own elections and our own currency. The UK is responsible for Defence and Foreign Relations, although the Island has sometimes acted by itself dimplomatically (we signed a tax treaty with the USA a few years ago)
Sorry to rant on, but I have to do my bit to promote the Island!
It is the flag of the Isle of Man. If you check it, you’ll see it has a similarity to the ancient flag of Sicily (my fiancee is Sicilian-Australian, ironic or what). It is commonly known as the “Three Legs of Man”.
The authentic name is the “Triskelion” and it is accompanied by the national motto – “Quocuncue Jeceris Stabit”. I used to think the latin phrase meant “whichever way you throw me I land on my feet” but I’m not 100% sure on that. Either way, “Triskelion” is a derivation of the Greek for “Three Legged”
The Greek influence was believed to be responsible for the adoption of the Sicilian flag, which is similar except for a Medusa’s head in the centre. The Triskelion has been observed on rock-carvings in Italy.
Conversely, the Triskelion is part of Norse mythology and the Isle of Man has a population with Norse antecedents. The Vikings were the historic rulers, and they established the “Tynwald” which is our national parliament. It still runs the country today and means we can justifiably claim to be the oldest continuously existing democracy in the world.
There is a State opening of Tynwald every year. I missed last year (I was away) but King Harald of Norway opened it for us. The Queen herself is expected this year. Prince Charles opened it about 4 years ago I think (he flew over himself in his BAe 146).
Constitutionally, the Island is NOT part of the UK but is a dependent territory of the Commonwealth. As I’ve said, we have our own parliament, our own legislature, our own elections and our own currency. The UK is responsible for Defence and Foreign Relations, although the Island has sometimes acted by itself dimplomatically (we signed a tax treaty with the USA a few years ago)
Sorry to rant on, but I have to do my bit to promote the Island!
Oi!
You cheeky bugger!!
Oi!
You cheeky bugger!!
That was part of my reasoning. They cooperated closely with Air Pacific on the 737-800 purchase. Who knows, maybe it is intended for Qantas use eventually?
Also, the colour scheme seemed Qantas-ish. It could be quickly repainted in QF colours.
I would expect Skyteam.
KLM would be a big catch for any alliance and there is no doubt BA in particular would love to have KLM on board. But if I remember correctly there was a clash of cultures between KLM and BA when the takeover talks were in progress, so maybe they would prefer Air France.
Interestingly, I think they will be under pressure to consider the political dimension –
Skyteam – “old europe”
Oneworld – “new europe”
Anyway, why was Star ruled out?
Yes, I felt the programme makers were a little too keen to interview the AA pilots – who came across as jerks, in all honesty.
They want to fly Boeings now, because they don’t like composite tailfins, but I’m sure 777’s have composites too! Maybe they meant 727s? Professionally, they were prepared to publicly criticise an aircraft that millions of people fly on, yet they couldn’t even contemplate there may have been something other than an Airbus design fault at issue.
Similarly, Airbus gave the impression of being quite an uncommunicative company. Mentally though, I did expect that but I was a little unprepared for the AA attitude to it all.
Still, well done overall to the programme makers. It was one of the more balanced productions I’ve seen, and more or less resisted the temptation to bash Airbus.
That is seriously negligent, flying passengers on a cargo plane. If I were a Congolese lawyer I’d be at the hospitals in a flash.
Originally posted by A330Crazy
They have ruined this aircraft! VLM doesn’t really give the impression that they would plaster adverts like this on their aircraft, the airline has always come across with Class to me.Like comet says, I hope its not a lasting thing!
But lots of airlines advertise. BA has a whole fleet of logo jets. You think advertising a country doesn’t count?
I think that by making chips more and more complex there is a risk of high production losses due to flawed chips.
Perhaps the future will bring lots of smaller chipsworking together, like brain cells.
I think that by making chips more and more complex there is a risk of high production losses due to flawed chips.
Perhaps the future will bring lots of smaller chipsworking together, like brain cells.