RAF Museum is a complete joke. The last research enquiry I sent to them wasn’t even acknowledged.
Recently I have been experiencing the same thing!
Contrary to that however was a very positive experience I had last summer with the RAF Museum, when I made an online enquiry about some drawings for the Spitfire. There was a woman then working in archives; I don’t recall her name but it will be somewhere in my records; anyway she sent me A2 copies of the drawings within a few weeks, accompanied by a very polite letter and of course the invoice, which I must say was very reasonable. I paid the invoice and surprisingly she took the time to send me another letter thanking me for prompt payment.
At that time the service was exceptional and I could not fault it, in fact I went out of my way to tell people of this marvellous service……then suddenly it all changed!!
A lot of my more recent correspondence has either not been acknowledged or the recipient was not very helpful.
Thats quite good – If I may suggest applying a smoothing parameter to the sky and a slight reduction on the overall granularity on the aircraft – should look really good then.
Sigma lenses from my experience are actually quite good. It is worthwhile checking if you can get your lens of choice calibrated – I did this for my camera and I have absolutely no complaints about quality.
A very good question – depends a lot on your budget.
Personally I would opt for an SLR – this gives you much more flexibility in choosing the type of lenses you want and also gives you access to other manufacturers products other than your camera make.
There are of course a few exceptions to the latter statement – for example if you choose the Sigma SD14 then you are for the most part stuck with Sigma lenses – although that’s not a real problem, because their lenses are good. On the other hand if you select a Canon, Olympus or a Nikon you have a greater choice between own brand products as well as the Sigma and Tamron range.
I am sure that others will recommend lenses with Optical Stabilisers and fast apertures, but this all comes back to your budget.
Other considerations include focus speeds, exposure bracketing options and handling characteristics to name but a few.
Hi Frank – interesting work and a good website.
Admittedly I just had a quick browse but to me the gallery images seem a little flat – although a sample picture was easily corrected with a small levels adjustment in Photoshop.
This is perhaps something that is simply a consequence of conversion to srgb for website viewing.
Hi Chumpy,
Thankyou very much – this image will be very helpful and the quality is really quite good.
Now if I can just find a drawing for these jigs.
Hi Steven,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
I had a look at the huricanerestoration website which is very informative – but alas also expensive for the drawing copies. Their list of drawings though was very useful as a resource to add to what I have managed to collate so far.
I did not see a manual listed for the Hurricane, but they do have ‘interchangeability data sheets’ which may help.
The link to Canada Aviation museum was very interesting – thank you.
I see you are in Canada – I just finshed a job there last year in Toronto – was there for a few years – had a great time though the work was certainly challenging.
Regards
Hugh