He would choose a 732. Very cheap and economical.

And of course carries many more pax than the competition, will have a spotless new interior and engines which don’t kick out plumes of smoke 😀

The engines on a 738 produce around 5,000lb’s more of thrust, EACH than the 732. It therefore has about 25% more thrust than the 732, and this is why it carries more passengers! A 747 carries much more passengers than a 737, and has the power to go with it. You wouldn’t expect a fully-laden 747 to get up in the same space though would you?! Therefore you can’t expect a 738 to do the same as a 732.

Not in my opinion. The 777 does have excellent range capabilities, I said earlier, I cannot dispute the fact. However, I personally prefer 3 or 4 engines for long-haul. All this 777 and 330 nonsense. I blame the 767 that was the aircraft that started this off.

Funny how the 767 shares much, and was designed alongside your beloved 757.

I expect the interiors to be kept to a decent standard and not worn carpets and seat covers. Wisdom comes with age something you will learn as you mature LBA.

The 777 has got two engines so in my book it will always be medium-haul at best, despite its range capabilities.

If you’re so contempt at backing up your points with REAL information, could you please prove to us that the 777 is a ‘medium-hauler at best’? You may come into a slight bit of trouble when you realise the range is in the region of 7000nm or more :rolleyes:

Great shots there, nice one of DHJZ (flew to/from Arrecife on this one the other month 😀 )

Lovely shots, roughly how many mm of zoom were required for those sort of runway shots?

Great shots Ben, ah don’t you just love the cocktail bars down on Puerto Del Carmen?! How much I miss them 🙁 No doubt I’ll land myself there again soon though!

Glad to be of help 🙂