That UTAP-22 based on the BQM-167 seems to be too small to carry even SDBs. Is the idea to carry only small weapons and be used for CAS with APKWS, JAGM and such?
Technically, 2 left and 2 joined :).
On a more serious note, no it is not due to Trump. Leonardo was having trouble keeping a viable industrial partnership since pre-Trump, and Northrop Grumman cited value to their shareholders given the RFP, which was drafted, in its entirety by the acquisition shop at the USAF and approved by the Obama appointed acquisition czar.
Ok. I think Trump has to be careful not to bargain too much with the defense companies or that might have detrimental consequences. But I think he’s smart he knows how far he can go.
Could it be that it is Trump that scares the bidders?
A dual role CUDA could be a good idea too to saturate radar defenses. 8 missiles onboard. Wishfull thinking at this point for sure.
Yeah there were, overlooked the non-USAF participating units.
Considering the F-35’s mission set, the access U.S. has had to early S-300 systems, I wouldn’t say it is unreasonable that the F-35 performed well against simulated threats.
Maybe really the first generation S-300, and even at that.
Apart from this, I think the idea of prioritizing the JDAM and GBU-12 for the IOC instead of the SDB1 and laser SDB1 was stupid. Other planes like bombers can go after large buildings and bridges with 1 ton JDAMs, while the SDB/LSDB give the F-35 8 bombs in stealth mode against radars, TELs, rocket launchers, tanks, aircraft shelters, and non armored targets for CAS and all that at long range.
Based on the intent and purpose of RF, it more likely that the simulated threat was more sophisticated that what the F-35 will face in the majority of potential combat theaters.
No Growlers at RF 17-1.
Yes there were Growlers at RF 17-1:
I have a very hard time believing an F-35 can get within JDAM range of a top notch russian radar without jamming support at least.
This exercise was conducted just before Trump took office. It may well be that it was set up to make the F-35 look better.
Overall still I think it did well overall though.
JDAM for SEAD ? what a lousy SAM battery
Methinks they got help from the growlers or the threat was not representative.
That is yet to be determined. Gilmore claimed it would be but he has so far been wrong on most of the date claims he has made.
It’s getting more and more sure that there will be a delay of 6 months or so.
The jet is capable of 4 AIM-120 now. SDB would be nice but not necessary, the JDAM is more than capable for missions the F-35 will conduct, such as SEAD conducted at Red Flag.
Block 3I is limited to 2 AMRAAMs. SDB would give 8 shots intead of 2 in stealth mode, very useful for SEAD and other penetration missions.
I think to be able to launch the AMRAAM from the a2g station they need a different adapter with an ejector. Not sure if they have started to work on that. But 4 AMRAAMs with an ability to maintain mach 1.2 with minimum afterburner would be a nice capability for the next 2 years if it’s possible. Mach 1.6/9Gs is not needed as much now, since the F-35 can dominate in BVR thanks to its stealth.
That kind of drone could be used to find and destroy aircraft in the open on an airfield. Load a bunch of those in a long range CM.
Given that block 3F is going to be delayed, I wonder if it wouldn’t make sense to try to do a release now with what’s available. 4 AMRAAMs and internal SDBs would be the most important if possible.
So it seems it would be some sort of upgraded growler lite. Problem is, the AN/ALQ-218 seems to be very expensive, around 18 million apparently:
http://www.deagel.com/Aircraft-Protection-Systems/ANALQ-218-TJSR_a001431001.aspx
Not sure the 18 million figure is accurate now.
Actually PF stops at 40mm, for lesser caliber a different system is used: after target distance is determined using laser telemetrics rounds are automatically programmed to explode after a certain time while they pass through the barrel itself.
However the less the weapon caliber, the less its airburst efficacy: optimal with 35mm, still useful with “heavy” 30 mm, not convenient with lesser calibers.
Given that airplane guns have usually a very great rate of fire it’s still considered preferable to use conventional ammo for them, leaving them for land and, above all, sea based systems.
The GAU-22 is based on very old technology, I find it hard to believe they couldn’t have designed something radically better after 50+ years. If the ammunitions can be progammed to explode at a given distance, for the CAS mission the gun can have an air burst effect and 3-5 times less rounds are required. Basically the F-35 would have the firepower of an A-10 against dismounted infantry. I’m not sure that kind of ammo would be very effective against air targets though because they move very fast and they they can change directory abruptly. Maybe a proximity fuze would work better for that.
Even laser guided rounds could be possible. Even 50 cal rounds have been designed with laser guidance. Maybe a mix of LG and air burst rounds if a dual feed system can be built.
I wonder if they could make a 25mm ammo with a proximity fuze. Or maybe the same type of ammo that the XM-25 fires that can be programmed to explode at a precise distance. That would enable to have air burst munitions against air and ground targets. Combined with an automatic radar lock, that could be effective at long range against air and surface targets. The aircraft could also strafe GPS coordinates automatically.
That kind of ammo would probably be hard to build but maybe not impossible.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/812061677160202240
Based on the tremendous cost and cost overruns of the Lockheed Martin F-35, I have asked Boeing to price-out a comparable F-18 Super Hornet!
Trump is a negociator, maybe he wants to have as much leverage as possible when dealing with LM. The fact that we don’t know exactly his intentions is precisely what he wants.
Previously the idea was to call back veteran pilots both retired, working in civilian airlines or destined to other duties.
Now i didn’tknow if they are stillpossible to do it.
Former F-16A were for as an example sold to foreign countries and I didn’t know how much of stored MiGs are actually still in flying condition.
Production gap is probaly too great to cover it with stored planes and reserve pilots.
If you’re talking about the USAF, quite a few of As have been sold. I don’t know how many still remain.
Btw if the USAF upgrades 300 F-16s with AESAs, that would free up 300 APG-68s to possibly upgrade the remaining As, giving them substantial capabilities in a2a and a2g. For the F-15, it the F-15Es are upgraded with APG-82s, that would free up about 200 APG-70s for the old F-15As airframes.