dark light

Hotshot

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,028 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UCAV/UAV/UAS News and discussion 2015 #2233185
    Hotshot
    Participant

    I wonder to what extent the UCLASS could fill some of the roles of the hawkeye. The hawkeye is not stealthy at all so it would be detected from very far and would give away the approximate location of the carrier group.

    A stealthy UCLASS would also have the capability of entering enemy airspace with a strike package and give 360 degrees situational awareness during the attack.

    Wouldn’t it make sense for the USN to reduce the number of E-2s and focus more on a stealthy design for the UCLASS?

    in reply to: General Discussion #282779
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Quoting a 100% certified nutjob like Ann Barnhardt in support of any argument is like suggesting that the Daily Mail’s slant on an article in Wikipedia is the guaranteed 100% truth.

    Give us credit.

    Moggy

    Right, shoot the messenger because what she says is not politically correct.

    Here are more links with similar figures:
    http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17/table/T1

    Another article with more detailed infos:
    http://europenews.dk/en/node/34368

    In they UK they have a lot of problems with inbred muslims ( Pakistanis in particular ) and they want to pass laws to forbid first cousin marriages. More and more pakistani couples in the UK now use genetic screening to make sure they don’t have children with genetic deficiences.

    It is immoral to let a child be born with deficiencies, but who cares about morals, certainly not islam and the prophet who gave the example.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2233434
    Hotshot
    Participant

    They have:

    Along with airborne test with ASRAAM (not separation yet)

    That may be true but are we sure it is not a pit test? I am a bit skeptical because there has not been any pic and video released.

    All Block 2B Weapons Test complete

    Right but as far as I understand, block 2b testing does not include external JDAMs and GBU12 release, they have done only the flutter tests so far. The pdf I posted before about weapon integration is not very clear as to whether there will be external weapons activated for block 2b or 3i.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2233525
    Hotshot
    Participant

    They may well have done fit checks of the GBU-39, but they have not dropped it. I just searched on YouTube there is no video of GBU-39 test. No image with GBU-39 on Google image either.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233532
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Unless the KPP´s are upgraded (the document is still a draft), yes its sure.
    On that second link, the fbo link, on the bottom, there´s a downloable doc (an excell) that describes the KPP/KSA/APA/HSI that are required, the radar “capability” is described on KSA5:

    Its a simulator, not a real radar. Thats the common method/system used by almost everyone who has bought advanced jet trainers for quite some time.

    Cheers

    Ok, thanks for the clarification.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2233561
    Hotshot
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/IR0OsS3.jpg

    Yes, it is Block 3F but they are already doing testing for it (along with JSOW and other Block 3F weapons)

    I vaguely remembered seeing that picture, but they are SDB IIs not GBU-39 SDB Is. The article is talking about tests of SDB Is. The SDB II is intentded to be IOCed at block 4, so it would make no sense to test them before the SDB I.

    And the fact that the journalist doesn’t know that the AIM-9X is for block 3F makes me think he may be confused about all those weapon tests.

    in reply to: General Discussion #282783
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Too much inbreeding doesn’t help either…

    http://dcgazette.com/muslim-inbreeding-may-genetic-catastrophe/#

    And one has to wonder if the problems of development in muslim countries are not due to that, at least in part. Trying to help these countries seems pretty useless unless they pass laws to forbid inbreeding. The jihadists, talibans etc… are probably inbred mental retards. And trying to build schools, help their economy, build democracies etc is unlikely to work if their population is half retarded.

    The percentage of inbreds depends on the country, but what has the impact been after dozens of generations?
    http://www.barnhardt.biz/the-one-about/the-one-about-muslims-being-inbred/

    Algeria: 22.6%
    Bahrain: 39.4%
    Egypt (North): 20.9%
    Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%
    Iraq: 47.0%
    Jordan: 28.5%
    Kuwait: 22.5%
    Lebanon: 12.8%
    Libya: 48.4%
    Mauritania: 47.2%
    Morocco: 19.9%
    Oman: 56.3%
    Palestine: 17.5%
    Qatar: 54.0%
    Saudi Arabia: 42.1%
    Sudan: 44.2%
    Syria: 30.3%
    Tunisia: 20.1%
    United Arab Emirates: 40.0%
    Yemen: 40.0%

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233661
    Hotshot
    Participant

    They dont. The KPP/KSA documents were publicaly released a year and a half ago.

    Here:
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2012/10/usaf-releases-draft-t-x-kpps/

    https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=399845681ea675ff09814d3e74c0d4f7&tab=core&_cview=0

    An actual radar on the aircraft would amount to an upgrade to the KSA/KPP.

    Cheers

    Thanks for the links.

    The first link doesn’t have any info on a radar indeed, but the second says:

    One of the requirements is that it should be able to take the place of the F-22 bridge course (Eight rides in a two-seat F-16, doing night aerial refueling and making sure the new guys can pull 9Gs while operating the radar and what not) before new pilots head to the Raptor B-course.

    I take it that it will have no radar, but is it sure?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2233664
    Hotshot
    Participant

    http://defense-update.com/20150116_f35_weapons_tested.html#.VLlHjTgtG1s

    JPO update on weapon certification.

    It is surprising that they have not released pictures and videos of F-35 with SDBs. I have the impression that the journalist is mistaken between tests of GBU-39s and GBU-12s.

    And AFAIK, the AIM-9X integration is for block 3F, not block 2B:
    dtic.mil/ndia/2012annual_psr/WERTH.pdf

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233681
    Hotshot
    Participant

    USAF won’t do this for the same reason they refuse to buy any upgraded legacy fighters – anything with mission overlap on F-35 that gets purchased means fewer F-35s.

    That and the fact that the US simply doesn’t need an armed trainer. For air policing they have more capable F-35s and F-22s. For low intensity COIN ops they have drones, for peer-adversaries or ones with near-peer capabilities an armed trainer would be SAM fodder.

    The stealth aircraft would be deployed abroad in case of conflict, so I guess the role of air defense would be done more by F-16s.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233704
    Hotshot
    Participant

    You have to think about the support costs, as well. How much would it cost to refurbish those radars & keep them working, & how would that compare to the cost of a basic new set such as Vixen 500E? IIRC one of the reasons why US Customs and Border Protection replaced secondhand APG-66s in their patrol aircraft with Vixen 500E was expected lifetime cost, it being expected to be much cheaper to maintain.

    AESAs are said to be significantly cheaper to operate, so indeed this has to be taken into account, although I don’t think a trainer would really need a high performance radar. We will see if they want a radar in the TX.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233876
    Hotshot
    Participant

    Same for the proposal From Boab (pronounced Bob ;)) – forget about the RWR etc. Just add a PS-05/A to the nose…

    I was thinking more of reusing existing radars. They could take radars from F-16s stored at AMARG that cannot be reactivated. Say APG-66s, and maybe take the IFFs from the F-16 ADFs.

    I don’t think the USAF would want to spend much on air to air capabilities for the TX. They want to keep the cost as low as possible.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2233890
    Hotshot
    Participant

    I wonder, couldn’t they reuse old APG-68s from the retired F-16s for basic air defense roles. Maybe the FA-50 could be equipped with it with minor modifications. It would be great if the trainer had an air to air capability for air policing at minimum cost.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) #2233978
    Hotshot
    Participant

    The number of F-35 technicians needed will increase exponentially from now on. The USAF will continue to push for the retirement of the A-10 to get more personal but the congress will refuse.

    It seems like the congress takes better decisions that the USAF. The USAF argument to retire the A-10 in 2015 was BS. They say it themselves:

    He said the Air Force had found a way to maintain its initial detachment of operational F-35s despite a shortage of technicians caused by lawmakers’ refusal to allow the Air Force to retire its A-10 attack planes.

    ( in the second article above )

    in reply to: General Discussion #282890
    Hotshot
    Participant

    We have to be much tougher with naturalisation laws and we should use the laws to remove our nationality in case of extremist individuals.

    There is a lot of propaganda that we should refrain from islamophobia, that 99.99% of muslim can integrate in our countries bla bla… This is balloney. Check these stats:
    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm

    41% of british muslims want the sharia in the UK.
    Pew Research (2007): 26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
    35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
    42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
    22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified.(13% overall).
    29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified.(25% overall).

    Pew Research (2007): 5% of American Muslims have a favorable view of al-Qaeda (27% can’t make up their minds). Only 58% reject al-Qaeda outright.

    etc etc…

    The enemy is within us, the number is growing, it doesn’t bode well to say the least.

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,028 total)