dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1168440
    VoyTech
    Participant

    This to me is N3295 of 222 Sqn. On 31 May P/O G Davies landed wheels down and taxied to the dunes before setting the Spitfire on fire.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1169555
    VoyTech
    Participant

    To my certain knowledge only wooden bladed Rotol prop assemblies have ever been found on early mark Spitfire wrecks, or, as to be expected, the metal blades on the more usual DeHavilland props as per the Mk I.

    How many of those wooden-blade Rotol recoveries do you mean?
    Looking through quite a lot of photos of crashed Spitfires (isn’t ebay great even if the only thing you can afford are those low res previews?) I have not found a single Rotol-propeller Mk I/IIs with broken (i.e. wooden) blades that could be dated at before 1942. They all seem to be bent (i. e. metal) in 1940/41.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1169579
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Al Deere’s Spitfire on Dunkirk beach. Rotol propeller. Metal blades.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1170338
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Spitfires were fitted with Dowty/Rotol propellor assemblies – ie wooden blades.

    I think the question is posed in a confusing manner. Rotol propellers were first fitted to a number of No. 54 Sqn Mk Is in the spring of 1940 and these were used operationally over Dunkirk. But these early Rotol propellers had metal blades. I don’t think wooden blades were used in opertional service before Mk V Spitfires.

    in reply to: Photo's of an RAF career 1930's to 1960's ! #1204312
    VoyTech
    Participant

    It reads 1-20 down the left hand column headed ‘Number’ in Burmese then UB410-UB425 down the second column headed ‘Registration number’ in Burmese.

    Looks more like UB401-UB420 to me.

    in reply to: Polish pilot Josef Huk #1223293
    VoyTech
    Participant

    It is also possible that the man in question was a pilot during the war under an original Polish name which proved too complicated for the British and he had it abbreviated to Huk after the war. If that’s a family member you’re talking to, is there any chance the family might have any document(s) related to his service? If his service no. could be identified this would make things easier.

    in reply to: Polish pilot Josef Huk #1224229
    VoyTech
    Participant

    If he was Polish, his first name would be spelt JOZEF. It seems no such man served with the WW2 Polish Air Force. There was a pilot named Jozef Hajduk, and a pilot named Pawel Hur, and a flight engineer named Edward Huk, but no pilot (or any other trade) named Jozef Huk.
    However, with this name he could easily be Czech or Slovak.

    in reply to: Question Re: Al Deere's Kiwi's…for Mark12 Perhaps?? #1174353
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Don’t forget Rotol constant-speed propeller with blunt spinner.

    in reply to: 'New' Spitfire/Seafire Query #1189024
    VoyTech
    Participant

    P9373 – the ex-Time Team recovered Spitfire of Sgt Paul Klipsch. Interesting!
    P9374 – the Calais beach recovered Spitfire of F/O Peter Cazenove and now with John Romain at Duxford.
    All that is needed is P9372 to complete the set! Not impossible. 😉

    Or P9375. Which would expand the ex-222 Sqn mafia even further. Speaking of which, AR614 and BL614 are another interesting coincidence.

    in reply to: A Spitfire For Six #1193448
    VoyTech
    Participant

    MV-O or MV-D – 53 OTU aircraft. I love the fuselage roundel proportions.

    in reply to: "Spitfire" crash info sought #1203657
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Sgt Zygmunt Kowalski, killed in the crash.

    in reply to: "Spitfire" crash info sought #1221462
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The code of W3569 was SZ-E

    in reply to: Spitfire Odds-n-Ends #1221650
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Actually none of thse came from footnote. Everytime I try and download a photo from their site my computer goes bonkers:eek:
    Oscar Coen gave me the shot of the 4th FG Spit getting an engine change.
    The others came from a trip to the National Archives (many but not all can be found on footnote) while looking for AAF Spit shots. I do have a few others if your interested ie Eagle Sqd, 31st FG and few 52nd FG and 126 (?) squadron shots.

    Sorry, I should have said it was my guess. I have seen all of these photos, except that of the French Captain, there, so I assumed that was where they came from.

    in reply to: Spitfire Odds-n-Ends #1222467
    VoyTech
    Participant

    John Rawlings in his tome ‘Fighter Squadrons’ drew his data from the Squadron ORB’s. He lists MK629 as being with 154 Squadron whose unit code was HT.

    I’m sure I have seen another picture (colour one, perhaps) of the same aeroplane where the serial number was visible and it was indeed MK629.

    in reply to: Spitfire Odds-n-Ends #1223836
    VoyTech
    Participant

    http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj241/jaepton/SpitIX601Squadron.jpg
    Spitfire Mk IX 601 Sqd (?) s/n MH_29

    154 Sqn in Corsica prior to Southern France landings

    http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj241/jaepton/zzSpitfireservicing-1.jpg
    Spitfire MKVbTrops being serviced in Italy 1944

    More like Mk VCs. That’s Yugoslav ground crew training IIRC.

    http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj241/jaepton/spit5-1.jpg
    Spitfire Mk IX MH869 Polish Squadron

    No. 302 ‘City of Poznan’ Squadron

    Does any body know what the lighter colour patches are on all three Spit’s just forward of the tails?

    Gas patches, presumably

    May I be so bold as to ask where you came across them?

    http://www.footnote.com

    but it was serial number BR498 Got a image of this one in your collection?

    That’s the one in the first photo in this thread

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 953 total)