dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • VoyTech
    Participant

    NH188 (now in Canada) was flown in 308 Sqn in June 1944, including on D-Day by the Sqn OC.
    Also, I believe parts of R6644 were recovered some years ago, but that’s not a survivor, is it?
    I believe the Sqn had a Maggie as a hack during 1940-43. I dont think they had any hacks while in 2nd TAF, but 131 (Polish) Wing had Auster(s).

    Why are you interested in 308 Sqn?

    in reply to: Spitfire IX's of 229 & 401 sqns; information required #1410975
    VoyTech
    Participant

    1) MkIX (c or e subtype unkown, F/LF/HF also unknown) 229 Sqn RAF, 9R-Z (serial unknown). He crash-landed it on an ’emergency strip’ – maybe Manston or maybe ALG in France? – 23/6/44 after combat proported to have involved “bazi” weiss, an fw190 ‘ace’.

    Lastly (but more of a two parter) i’d like to try and find the serial no. for 9R-Z. Then what sub-type IT was. 😮

    The last might be a challenge but the reference to the crash landing and the specific date (if correct – fingers crossed!) might narrow down the seach considerably.

    MH871 force-landed on ALG 23/6/44 F/O Armstrong safe (funny enough, in my notes it is 9R-O)
    MH871 was a regular Mk IX (“F.IXc”) of late CBAF production batches.

    in reply to: Events in London today #1405416
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My thoughts and prayers to those who were killed or injured and their families.

    Ditto

    Feel it would be best to cancel another major event this weekend as a mark of respect. You all know what im talking about.

    I feel this would be exactly the kind of thing those *s wanted to achieve. As a foreigner, I do hope the British “business as usual” attitude is not lost.

    in reply to: Must have that photo. #1416827
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Jagan
    Thanks for your explanations of known/unknown. Your comment about paparazzi made me wonder if any of those guys back in 1939-1945 had any idea that one day their snapshots would be worth substantial money…

    JDK
    Methinks we had (more than once) this sort of discussion about price vs. value/reasonable vs. nonsense when talking about warbird industry, haven’t we?

    bearoutwest
    I’m happy because I can have a copy of the photo without having paid 1000 euros for it.
    I’m not happy because I though something decent has been done, and Alex called it nonsense right away.
    My general point was that if a photo is sold on ebay at a crazy price it doesn’t necessarily go to an awful greedy maniac willing to lay his hands on a rare tiem ahead of everybody else, to be able to yell “I got it!”. Sometimes it goes to people whose point is to make sure the photo gets much publicity, and is not locked away in someone’s safe for another 50 years.

    italian harvard
    Taking it personally, moi?
    You have almost persuaded me about the reasonability of buying old watches at crazy prices, but for one thing: you called it a piece of machinery that runs great and keeps time like a digital watch. If that’s the bottom line, why not buy a digital watch that runs great and keps time like itself, and costs a fraction of that? A watch is a watch, of course it can look nice or not, have its history or not, but any watch serves its actual purpose if it runs OK.
    On the other hand, a rare old photo of a little known object (like this) contains a lot of unique information that serves to expand the knowledge of researchers when they have a chance to study it carefully. It is this information that makes it valuable in cases like this, not the “darn piece of paper”.

    in reply to: Must have that photo. #1417628
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Under a commercial point of view u own a picture when u own the negative

    I think we’ve had that kind of discussion before. In short, “under a commercial point of view you own a picture” when you own the copyright for that picture which is not necessarily equal to owning the negative.

    what I know is that I dont know if this print is worth 1.010 €uros..

    If there are people willing to pay a certain amount of money for something, then it is certainly worth that amount of money for them.

    any serious pic collector out there who wants to express his opinion about it?

    Define “serious”.
    I presume whoever spends 1000 euros for a pic is not “serious” in your opinion, right?

    in reply to: Must have that photo. #1418166
    VoyTech
    Participant

    picture collecting has become an increasing business lately, but 1.010 €uros for a print is nonsense.. I theorically would have spent the same amount for a negative, but not for a print..

    Why is it nonsense with a print but not with a negative?

    I’ve spent WAY more for rare Luftwaffe watches, but under a mere economical point of view there’s a market for them, while a print…

    ebay proves there certainly is a market for photos, it’s just that you prefer watches. Many people (including myself) will tell you that spending thousands of euros on Luftwaffe watches is nonsense.

    chapeau to the seller though, who surely at first made money with the magazines to publish it, and then sold it on ebay

    Why do you accuse a decent guy of a dirty trick? The magazines (both of them) used the print that they together got on ebay.

    in reply to: Must have that photo. #1419695
    VoyTech
    Participant

    As a post-script to this thread, Poland’s two leading aviation magazines have published the photo in their June issues, accompanied by expert comments from the country’s most renowned aviation historians. In fact both magazines considered it important enouight to advertise the photo on the cover. The two titles are normally strong competitors (think of Flypast vs. FWAEOF). In this case they both had editorials explaining that they united their efforts with other enthusiasts to make sure the photo is made available to general public in Poland. Now all collectors and historians can have a decent quality copy of the photo simply by spending a couple of quid on a copy of either magazine.

    in reply to: RAF Paint Colour Question #1432211
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Anyone think it might be a sun-bleeched olve drab? – Nermal

    Perhaps for someone used to the Australian Foliage Green, even unfaded Olive Drab might look grey.

    in reply to: Old Crow @ NW, Friday 10/6/05 #1339944
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I surrender !!! 😉

    “That’s why I wrote it.”

    in reply to: Old Crow @ NW, Friday 10/6/05 #1340360
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I know Eric for many years now. I’m prouwd to say that he is one of my friends. Yes he looks very young but I can tell you that ‘Old Crow’ is in very good and safe hands with him.

    Eric, has several thousand of hours of experience, he is captain 767, 737; he flew A320, A330, T-6, Stearman, A-26, Skyraider, Stampe, Moth, Chipmunk, T-28, and many other types.

    But over all other consideration, I flew with him and he his ones of those very few pilots that has this amazing feeling and skill who makes the all difference.

    He is not THE pilot of “Old Crow” just by luck !
    When you own such a plane, you do not chooze the first “junkey” to fly it.

    But then, he has never flown the Spitfire (any Spitfire), so can he be regarded a real warbird pilot by this Forum’s standards?

    in reply to: Czech translation required please. #1340408
    VoyTech
    Participant

    So I was a bit wide of the mark then! Are you familiar with the site and if so, how complete is the information?

    It’s the first time I have seen the site. But it looks pretty similar to a book with this kind of listing they have published some years ago. It is quite complete in terms of the list of names, AFAIK (except for the fact that in some cases you have “?” in place of some data). The problem is it is all in Czech, so you get things like a guy’s place of birth: “Viden (Rakousko)” which means (believe me!) “Vienna (Austria)”.

    in reply to: Czech translation required please. #1340429
    VoyTech
    Participant

    “Seznam příslušníků československého letectva v RAF (1940-1945)”

    is “list of personnel of the Czechoslovak aviation in the RAF (1940-1945)”

    in reply to: IS THIS F/SGT ZYGMUNT KLEIN ? #1340889
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I don’t think the man by the Spitfire UM-V here is Sgt Zygmunt Klein.
    I know two other photos depicting Sgt Klein, and in all three (including the pre-war shot of him you have here) he looks pretty much the same, quite unlike the guy by the Spitfire.

    in reply to: Old Crow @ NW, Friday 10/6/05 #1340894
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I sat behind him (and the passenger) in the display briefing, he only looks about 16 years old. 😀 😮

    Neal

    When I met him at Góraszka two weeks ago, I told him the last time I saw ‘Old Crow’ fly was at Leuchars back in 1994. He smiled and said “Oh, that long ago? I wasn’t even born at the time.”

    in reply to: …and another picture quiz from Mark12 #1344021
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The attached shot is interesting as it shows Treble One’s interpretation of the change to C.1 Roundel post May 1942.

    Mark, this is before the C roundels were introduced throughout the RAF. These reduced visibility roundel proportions were apparently first introduced on night fighters. I don’t have details at hand, but you might want to check that Mk V book that JDK & co. have published.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 953 total)