dark light

GrahamF

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 373 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK Museum admission prices, visitor numbers and VAT #1066574
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Are you sure that charging admission is the best way? Flixton museum doesn’t charge and relies on donations and strange though it may seem the main reason is that there are less onerous rules and regulations to abide by this way.
    As soon as you charge the public you let yourself in for a lot of bother from the insurance point of view for one, as though you were running some big business.

    Graham

    in reply to: BA heritage ads #1074718
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Lets hope it hauls in some new younger aviation enthusiasts, in the same manner as Thomas the Tank did for the Railway preservation movement.

    Graham

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk IX BS464 #1074731
    GrahamF
    Participant

    I must admit I always look nervously up at the hanger roof structure at Duxford and Hendon
    [all that wood] and not a sprinkler system in sight.

    Graham

    in reply to: Spitfire 1/2 (I/II) windscreen details #1022898
    GrahamF
    Participant

    If you need any Perspex cutting out Tony I have a Laser cutter at work.

    Graham

    in reply to: Spitfire 1/2 (I/II) windscreen details #1030833
    GrahamF
    Participant

    If you need any Perspex cutting out Tony I have a Laser cutter at work.

    Graham

    in reply to: New Planned Recovery of a Spitfire MK9.. #1022902
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Am I missing something here. If a wreck containing fluids is left on the sea bed inevitably, at some time in the future, the fluids will leak out when the tanks rot/corrode/rust through. When that happens no one would notice or care.
    Alternatively if the wreck were to be recovered then surely measures can be taken to contain fuel or oil as part of the task.
    Richard

    Yes what you are missing here is that there are many people who ‘get off’
    in stopping things happening so anything that helps their argument is all to their good.

    Graham

    in reply to: New Planned Recovery of a Spitfire MK9.. #1030839
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Am I missing something here. If a wreck containing fluids is left on the sea bed inevitably, at some time in the future, the fluids will leak out when the tanks rot/corrode/rust through. When that happens no one would notice or care.
    Alternatively if the wreck were to be recovered then surely measures can be taken to contain fuel or oil as part of the task.
    Richard

    Yes what you are missing here is that there are many people who ‘get off’
    in stopping things happening so anything that helps their argument is all to their good.

    Graham

    in reply to: New Planned Recovery of a Spitfire MK9.. #1022984
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Are these excavations done in a rush as they never seem like a ‘Time Team’
    excavation? Perhaps they are under the constant threat of a desk bound twonk
    trying to stop it?

    Graham

    in reply to: New Planned Recovery of a Spitfire MK9.. #1030940
    GrahamF
    Participant

    Are these excavations done in a rush as they never seem like a ‘Time Team’
    excavation? Perhaps they are under the constant threat of a desk bound twonk
    trying to stop it?

    Graham

    GrahamF
    Participant

    Did you have permission from the owners/operators to reveal these images!

    Graham

    GrahamF
    Participant

    Did you have permission from the owners/operators to reveal these images!

    Graham

    in reply to: Production Engineering in WW2 #1024331
    GrahamF
    Participant

    What interests me is what quantity of aircraft were ‘remanufactured’ where a new aircraft mark was built but utilised a previous airframe, there is a good picture which shows Mark 14 spits being built at a supermarine works but the fuselages all have old paint on with various different squadron codes and it doesn’t look like a repair facility, so it looks like a lot of previous marks were consumed into new aircraft.

    Graham

    in reply to: Production Engineering in WW2 #1032288
    GrahamF
    Participant

    What interests me is what quantity of aircraft were ‘remanufactured’ where a new aircraft mark was built but utilised a previous airframe, there is a good picture which shows Mark 14 spits being built at a supermarine works but the fuselages all have old paint on with various different squadron codes and it doesn’t look like a repair facility, so it looks like a lot of previous marks were consumed into new aircraft.

    Graham

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1026158
    GrahamF
    Participant

    No I don’t think so.

    Graham

    in reply to: Hurricane incident , North Weald. #1034331
    GrahamF
    Participant

    No I don’t think so.

    Graham

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 373 total)