dark light

ericmunk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,519 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #804424
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Re Ivan Smirnov (his official name although he used Iwan Smirnoff himself), there are two good biographies on his life. In “Smirnoff vertelt” the flight above is mentioned briefly. Interesting career he had, also pre KLM. Russian son of a a landowner, ww1 army volunteer, injured in the trenches, soviet fighter ace, refugee from the revolution, deckhand from hong kong to Europe, RAF pilot instructor, worked for Handley Page, fought in the White Russian Army, was an early commercial pilot in Belgium and one of the first KLM pilots. Emergency landed an early KLM flight on the Goodwin Sands and got the whole crew and all passengers saved by a passing ship in mid winter before the tide turned. Pioneered many new routes. Shot down and injured in a DC-3 on a beach in Australia. Flew the Guinea routes for the USAAF for three years and after the war helped rebuild commercial aviation in Holland.

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #804426
    ericmunk
    Participant

    A nice shot taken at Croydon of Douglas DC-2 115-B HB-ITO and DC-2 PH-AKS of KLM. (date unknown)]

    In between May 1935 and October 1938.

    in reply to: Spitfire N3200. Now there is a surprise… #804726
    ericmunk
    Participant
    in reply to: Vickers Wellington recovery from IJsselmeer #804737
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Catching up to news, in early May it was announced that all three remaining crew members of this Wellington have now been identified.

    The remains of plut. r/op. strz. (Sgt.) Henryk Franciszek Sikorski and kpt. obs. (P/O) Maciej Wojciech Socharski were recovered from the wreck site in 2016 and have now been identified. They are expected to be buried with their fellow crew members in Amsterdam in the following months.

    Partial remains of plut. r/op. strz. (Sgt.) Stanisław Pisarski were also recovered from the site in 2016, and match those in the grave of an unidentified Polish airman in Amsterdam (above), leading to a positive identification. The nameless headstone is expected to be replaced with one bearing his name.

    Overall an excellent outcome I would say…

    (background information http://www.polishwargraves.nl/ned/r.1322.htm)

    in reply to: Heads up: Kaurit glue deterioration in wooden aircraft #804742
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Might be worth contacting the tc-holder to ask what glue they used. They usually are pretty quick to respond. From what I have seen up to now, Scheibe is one of the manufacturers thas has had little or no problems… Great glider BTW, an SF27M.

    in reply to: Heads Up. Dunkirk: The New Evidence #805177
    ericmunk
    Participant

    DB

    Let me allay your suspicions.

    Page 232. Chapter: “Germany triumphant”. “War in the West”, James Holland. Transworld Books.

    Quote:

    “…. Yet the Luftwaffe had suffered horrendously that opening day (May 10) with 192 bombers and fighters lost and damaged plus a staggering 244 transport aircraft. In all, 353 German aircraft and 904 pilots and crew would never fly again. After one day of battle. These were substantial losses.”

    The RAF were in the skies over Dunkirk with a vengeance !

    Recent research showed that the luftwaffe lost a staggering 361 aircraft in The Netherlands alone on May 10th 1940. 275 of these were Junkers Ju52, some of which were later compiled into ‘new’ aircraft. The numbers quotes are not that unlikely.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    I really hope the german LBA will not disable the whole Schleicher and Scheibe fleet from the sixties. You can imagine what happens if they are waking up.

    LBA does not have that authority. EASA now. They are Part M aircraft. Regardless, I would like an AD that mandates glue joint inspections. The problem is serious, is widespread and will not go away on its own…

    Anyway, not all were built with Kaurit. So an AD is unlikely to permanently ground a type.

    in reply to: Heads up: Kaurit glue deterioration in wooden aircraft #805457
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Very useful info. Thank you.

    Most welcome John. Can’t believe that such a widespread and wellknown problem has not triggered an AD yet…

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807000
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Good to see you’re enjoying the thread.

    G-ASEA: yes I hope the next Kite will be airborne soon. Dagling next? THAT would be rare as hen’s teeth to see in the air!
    ZRX61: Ten Kay seems to capture the costs involved in running warbirds. Never ceases to amaze me how much work they require to just keep tidy, let alone restore. Great thing about wooden frames is that materials come relatively cheap. Not so great thing is that the work involved tends to be quite time consuming (but fun!).

    As a bonus to the thread a picture of a major rebuild of an A-frame for a primary glider. We had a visitor drop by one day who was really into vintage aircraft. When giving him a quick tour of the shop, he dutifully recorded every aircraft in his little book but never noticed that the big wooden frame in the corner was actually an aircraft too… Just goes to show some rebuilds start with such a dismantling job that aircraft are no longer recognizable as aircraft!

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807468
    ericmunk
    Participant

    So, by this time we’re around 190 man hours down the road. And that’s the rudder fixed. By then, only the remainder of the airframe had to undergo a full glue failure survey, which was partially done with a boroscope, partially invasive by cutting a number of holes in the fabric. No further issues were found and the holes duly patched. Then just the annual to do, which had lapsed.

    Moral of the story is that a small job often turns out big. And there’s more work going on behind the scenes to keep these oldies flying than you may know. Happy landings!

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807472
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Which just leaves trial fitting (pfew, it still fits!), and covering it. Oh yes, and the doping, basing, spraying, weight & balance and a mountain of paperwork….

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807543
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Then it was just a question of putting the D-nose plywood back on. There’s a couple of tricky scarf joints in there too so there were four sections to be done… Add to that the curves around the hinges – which had to be refurbished first with all hardware replaced – and it took a fair amount of time before it was back to its old structural self.

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807578
    ericmunk
    Participant

    From here on it was time to put all the new bits in. A new spar web was spliced in on a custom-built jig. Sounds fancy, but we just made this to ensure it came out straight after the repairs. Then it was time to replace the two D-nose ribs that were beyond saving. And put all of them back onto the new spar web and properly conserve the wood with yellow dope.

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807667
    ericmunk
    Participant

    The bad section of spar was stripped. In order to repair this, practically the whole D-nose ply needed to come off. And the D-ribs. This is what was left when the bad bits had been removed.

    in reply to: Even minor issues take time and effort #807689
    ericmunk
    Participant

    In order to keep some structural integrity in the rudder before starting the major surgery bit, the trailing edge needed to be repaired. A straightforward job, splicing in a web of ply, with laminated longerons on both sides (preformed of course). Some issues with trailing edge gussets and a rib were then also rectified… That was the easy fix done. Now for the hard bit.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,519 total)