dark light

ericmunk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,519 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #913554
    ericmunk
    Participant

    SE-CAU has been in storage since it arrived.

    And will remain so for a long time to come probably. It was acquired with a view to restoring it in the exchange deal with the Spitfire mentioned above, but since then the museum at Lelystad has changed hands from a non-profit organization (that ran into severe financial difficulties) to a commercial company. The latter appears to have no interest in aircraft restoration if it is not commercially justifiable (i.e. increased revenue from visitors in the long run). The amount of work the Firefly will need makes it unlikely to be on display anytime soon at Lelystad. Hopefully a third party will step in.

    in reply to: Old aircraft instruments #914404
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Trouble is the post office now intercept radium instruments and stop them being forwarded on. Buyer or sender has to collect from the depot which they have been stopped at which can be a hundred or so miles away. Post office now have detectors to combat radio active items being sent through the post, radio active aircraft instruments are also on their prohibitive list. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news ! This can also effect Ebay sales unfortunately.

    Seek specialist advice where necessary. Some emitters are hardly detectable (notably alfa only) if properly packaged. Depends on what you ship where and how it is packed. Others can be a pain. There was a case recently where a containerized aircraft from the US into the Netherlands was seized because of radioactive instruments, quarantined and the instruments destroyed by a specialist company at the owner’s expense.

    in reply to: Anyone need a Mosquito engine? #915028
    ericmunk
    Participant

    I see there is a Pitts 12 on there as well. anyone know where in South Wales that this stuff is?

    St. Athan I would say?

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Mosquito! #918267
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Quite often the workmanship is not the problem. Either certification is, or lack of paperwork to back up the work done in the past.

    in reply to: Sad RAF Museum #918273
    ericmunk
    Participant

    On arrival at Hendon at 0930 I stopped at the booth on entering the car park and was promptly asked if I was there on business or to visit the Museum. I said I was a visitor and was told I could not enter the car park until 1000. I politely indicated to the lady in the booth that I had had a difficult journey, was not a young person and wanted to park and wait until 1000 but this fell on deaf ears.

    Sounds like my experience. We arrived half an hour early as well and were not allowed entry to the car park to wait for the museum to open. A most unwelcome start after a trip involving two cars, a train and a Ryan Air flight. The car park BTW was completely empty. We opted to head back into London traffic and grab a coffee somewhere…

    in reply to: 1965 World Gliding Championships – RAF South Cerney #920314
    ericmunk
    Participant

    That Edelweiss too is still around and flying…

    in reply to: Fokker F.VII Querry #920325
    ericmunk
    Participant

    A good candidate date for the event would be April 7th, 1931. An F.VII of CLS running the new Amsterdam-Prague line (it had started that week) made an emergency landing ‘just under’ Ter Aar (the Netherlands) due to engine failure according to De Telegraaf newspaper of April 8th, 1931 (the day after). Mechanics from Schiphol were roaded in to fix the problem so the aircraft could be flown out. Now, coincidence or not, a Gerardus van der Pijl ran a butcher shop in nearby Aarlanderveen, and he had a son also called Gerardus van der Pijl, who also was a butcher. They were 67 and 27 years old at the time respectively. The son was born on the address of Korteraarseweg 102, which to this day is in use as a butcher’s (Slagerij Van Harten, since 1930). I know the area well. It is extremely suitable for emergency landings, with long wide open fields, and is about halfway between Ter Aar and Aarlanderveen.

    in reply to: 1965 World Gliding Championships – RAF South Cerney #920422
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Thanx for that, Bazv.

    They truly are delightful little aircraft. Very direct control response, and very reasonable performance (even when flown inverted). Don’t fly one low and slow though, they have a nasty bite when stalled asymmetrically, and will sometimes reverse direction in a spin if opposite rudder is held in a little too long.

    in reply to: 1965 World Gliding Championships – RAF South Cerney #920436
    ericmunk
    Participant

    The Dart has been lovingly restored some years ago, and is flying from Tibenham.

    I note that one of the participants was the Dutch Sagitta prototype flown by Ordelman. Since it is being rebuilt by a friend of mine, I would love so see any pictures people might have of it at South Cerney… The restoration is superb, and has been a labour of love for nearly some decades now, nearing completion.

    in reply to: Fokker F.VII Querry #921520
    ericmunk
    Participant

    It would help to know what his relative’s occupation was (Butcher? Ground engineer at KLM or Fokker?)

    in reply to: Is there a Walrus flying boat under restoration to fly? #921670
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Is there some engineering reason why they never found broad postwar use?

    It was a British design 😉

    in reply to: Fokker F.VII Querry #921676
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Defection is a modern word to use, in 1922 were there any closed borders? Why ‘defect’ when Germany has borders with Holland and Poland? If you wanted to get from Poland or Germany to Holland just get a train. Sounds an odd story for the time.

    In between 1928 and 1935 there would have been several reasons to defect from Germany (Adolf Hitler coming to power in 1933 would have been one, for quite a large number of people from the German population). The Dutch border was a lot more closed than people think. The Netherlands saw the rising tension in Europe as a very good reasons to try and keep neutral, as it had been in WW1. It was not uncommon for refugees to be sent back at the border of the country in order not to offend any neighbouring countries…

    in reply to: Fokker F.VII Querry #921677
    ericmunk
    Participant

    The Fokker airliners used a mixed construction. Wooden wings and a fuselage of steel tubing covered with fabric.

    Actually ‘wing’. not plural. Tip-to-tip was one wooden spar, under which the fuselage was hung. This made repairs after accident quite complex.

    in reply to: Fokker F.VII Querry #921690
    ericmunk
    Participant

    It’s actually OK-AAI, a Fokker F.VIIa, construction number 4918 or 4919. It was originally registered as H-NADF (or H-NADH in one source) with KLM on 10 March 1926 then sold to Czechoslovakia as L-BAAI on 26 March 1928 or 18 April 1928 depending on source, subsequently re-registered as OK-AAI (the perspective makes the O look like a C). It was operated by CLS (Ceskoslovenska Letecka Spolecnost) in Czechoslovakia, the forerunner of CSA, and this name can be seen beneath the fuselage windows. It was de-registered on 15 March 1935.
    This aircraft can’t be associated with the defection story (why defect post 1928, just travel abroad?), especially given the dates of Czech airline service.

    Correcting your information, using Herman Dekker’s excellent research into the pre-war Dutch aircraft:
    – OK-AAI/L-BAAI was formerly H-NADF, not H-NADH. NADH was crashed in France in 1927 and recycled as spare parts in the build of H-NAEB (fuselage) and H-NADX (wing) by Fokker.
    – H-NADF/L-BAAI/OK-AAI was c/n 4918, not 4919 (which was H-NADG/L-BAAH/OK-AAH).
    – H-NADF was removed from the Dutch register on April 18th, 1928 following its sale to the Czech Republic.
    – The aircraft also flew for the Czech air force, apparently.

    in reply to: Help identify aircraft motor #845668
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Was wondering if anyone could help me identify this aircraft motor I came across and tell me more about it. Much appreciated.
    It’s a flat 4, two-cycle engine.
    Type: M2791
    Serial no.: 267
    Rating: 70hp- 4100rpm
    Meteor – Trieste
    Aircraft and electronics industry.
    And has a stamp: M3

    Drone engine, built by Meteor s.P.A. of Triest (Italy). Probably used for the earlier generation drones like the P.70 (may be a license-built McCullough flat four engine?).

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,519 total)