Remember that 1.5 metre bit of ply that had to go? That takes a lot of elbow grease to get off the ribs and spar. A lot of sanding, dust everywhere.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]243060[/ATTACH]
All sanded down to bare spruce, the innards of the D-nose are amazingly bare after all this work.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]243061[/ATTACH]
After all the loose ribs were reunited with the leading edge stringer, and all were freshly cleaned and liberally doused in conservative laquer, it was time to teach the new plywood plate how to swim. Next time we need a bigger tub.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]243062[/ATTACH]
Then the wet plate was draped over the D-nose. Some clamps were needed to persuade it to bend it into shape.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]243066[/ATTACH]
Some days later it was dry, and utterly convinced of its new shape. So we then glued it into place.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]243067[/ATTACH]
The only thing left to do now is to grind away excess and the supporting stringers, the redo all the gussets that attach the aft ribs to the spar face. Oh yeah, and then do it all over again on three more 1.5 metre sections that also need re-plying.
And replied to, Dave.
Eric
Flying into Schiphol airport at around that time, I was appalled at how poor the weather was. 300-feet low ceilings, less than half a km of visibility, drizzle and no horizon… Not great for flying (even IFR), and certainly not good for SAR either. Things are not looking good for the pilot of the Cirrus…
He has another one, I think? I have a flight in BGA.3225 with his daughter many years ago. Don’t know if it had an RAF serial.
*edit* nevermind, googled it 🙂 MH019/ WB993/ BGA 3225/ PH-201, same aircraft 🙂
He does have a motorized T31, a T8 and T30 though. He too has been greatly bitten by the Slingsby bug. Owners can’t seem to have any less than three… 😉
MH.019 at the VGC Rendez-Vous 2009. Very nice weather, too, that day!
This aircraft was sold to Bob van Aalst later on, and he put it on the Dutch register as PH-201 in May 2011. It is now based at Asperden/Goch (Germany).
Love that scheme. Wish they would paint a hurricane in the all orange scheme!
It was born out of necessity after a KLM DC-3 was attacked off the German coast on its scheduled flight to Sweden in September 1939. A Swedish passenger was killed and the aircraft took 65 hits but landed safely. After this all DC-3s on this line were painted bright orange with large lettering. The Netherlands at the time was neutral in the freshly started WW2.
The one that got stuck under a motorway bridge wasnt ex air Atlantique was it?
If you are referring to the damage done while moving the first Dak to the musical venue (AMCA is the second, the replacement): no. Initially F-BAIF from another museum was moved over to act as a prop (no pun intended), but that hit a concrete safety barrier (not a bridge) in motorway works effectively writing off the aircraft. That has since been broken up for parts use.
G-AMCA went to the Aviodrome museum at Lelystad (Netherlands). This was on outside display for some years fitted with the engines of DC-2 A30-14 representing a prewar KLM DC-3 in orange c/s. It is now on long-term loan to a theater company at Valkenburg as a backdrop for a musical that has been running for some years now (indoor).
What buried aircraft are they digging for, pray?
I note that the Air-Britain list lacks some details on PH-ALG. This was registered to J.J. Jimmink, Callantsoog 14.02.1939. Reason for its 1942 (administrative) cancellation was that the aircraft was burnt in the Luftwaffe attack on De Kooy where it was based, on 10.05.1940.
Finished new bit after reworking it down to correct dimensions. Compare to picture 3 of the last post and spot the differences.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242136[/ATTACH]
Very disappointing news and the Engineers have assessed it and now it’s down to the hauliers insurance to sort out.
That is some nasty damage on an aircraft meant to be restored to fly. Looks repairable though could be an economical write-off if commercially done.
http://s1270.photobucket.com/user/m0byd0g/media/08-08-201222-50-53.jpg.html
http://s1270.photobucket.com/user/m0byd0g/media/08-08-201222-47-58.jpg.html
:rolleyes:
Taking a wild guess here, but it COULD be the LH side panel from a Bristol Frightener indeed 😉
This is equally bizarre incident; http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1f7_1360043598
Carburettor icing.
Well, that T30 trailer has been built now too, so the Prefect has a new snug home to live in and travel in style. Which is a good thing. An even better thing is we can now finally get back to work on the port wing of the Sedbergh project. Wasting no time, it was squuezed into the busy shop (winter maintenance has also started on all the fancy white modern ships).
To properly assess the very obvious severe water ingress damage in the D-nose, we opened up some inspection holes for easy access. The term Swiss cheese springs to mind.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241998[/ATTACH]
Now, the D-nose of a Sedbergh is a properly robust thing. Thick plywood, lots of strength there. The ribs however are amazingly flimsy.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]241999[/ATTACH]
A surprise was hiding behind a small suspect patch plywood repair on the nose stringer of the D-nose, somewhere around the strut attachment. Somebody had obviously hit this Sedbergh wing head on against something even more solid than a Sedbergh wing somewhere in time. The repair that was done was, as they say, highly entertaining.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242000[/ATTACH]
Yes, that is the wrong type of wood. And yes, it has been glued in end-to-end against the rib and not spliced in 1:15 as it should be. And no, the glue joint is not of the correct thickness. And no, the nose of it does not follow the curve of the D-nose. In fact: the bit of wood looks alarmingly like a section of decorative ceiling liner that was conventiently laying around the shop at the time. Which it probably is, too. O, and the guys doing the repair had also missed the very obvious split that ran from their botched repair along the stringer into the next section of D-nose.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242001[/ATTACH]
So, out it came, and a proper bit of wood that was conveniently laying around in our shop was spliced in properly to factory specs and drawings. Looking much better now.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]242002[/ATTACH]
This gave the D-nose its structural integrity back, so one of the next jobs is to strip back a 1.5 metre section of plywood from the whole D of the D-nose and get that replaced with some proper plywood since the old stuff was beyond saving… Most ribs look to be fine and can be re-used. Which is what we expected, since we have some 30 extra ribs in stock for this section, and the things you tend to need to replace and rebuild usually only are the ones you don’t have in stock anyway.