dark light

ericmunk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,519 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wrecks and relics – some stunning images from the wilds #927620
    ericmunk
    Participant

    What is the second image of, showing a partially submerged wreck of some sort?

    RCAF Dakota near Snag YT (Canada).

    ericmunk
    Participant

    In my opinion the current “wot” is a Reinhard Cumulus glider.

    For more details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhard_Cumulus

    Thomas

    It is. Over to you.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Thank you. Next one:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234530[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Wrecks and relics – some stunning images from the wilds #851045
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Is the first one a DC-2?

    No. C-47. See: http://www.ruudleeuw.com/dc3_mystery.htm

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Renard R-37.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    the physical work involved with excavating the site with it being so close to the river and the potential discovery of hazardous building material and waste which would need disposing of.

    A bomber crash site near me was 2 metres from a major waterway, 4 metres deep, with ordnance found, fuel contamination, some hazardous materials and mixed up with household waste used to fill the crater. It took three weeks, 550,000 euros and some very serious equipment (not to mention a temporary dam), but remains of at least two airmen were recovered, against all expectations. Never say never.

    in reply to: WW2 era aircraft still working #858440
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Grumman Goose (although I seem to recall the last operational comemrcial example was retired last year?).

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #861530
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Damn! That pilot got lucky!

    It wasn’t that much of a drama. The wing still has its structural integrity intact, but it will require a fair bit of work to get it up to (our) standard again. The tail issue is a known one with several of the Slingsby types, but this has been one of the worst cases I have seen, developing in a rather short timespan. There’s a reason for annual inspections, I always say.

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #861551
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Well, the Sedbergh project is still going strong, with work slowing down a bit with the usual amount of other commitments in the workshop during winter.

    One of these ‘other commitments’ is a Slingsby Prefect that has been brought in for its annual. The annual turned out to be a fair load of work. First of all there was the vertical tail. It is not by all means a big vertical tail on this aircraft, but it seems to be very useful for flying, so we are somewhat attached to it. Unfortunately, the fuselage turned out to no longer be attached to it properly. What started out as a minor crack, turned out to be Pandora’s box.

    This is what we started with.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234206[/ATTACH]

    And then we discovered that Rib 1’s gluejoint to the top fuselage ply had partially failed. This is what helps hold the tail to the rest of the aircraft. So we opened a little inspection hole.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234207[/ATTACH]

    We then noticed that the D-nose longeron had disbonded from its position on the fuselage cross rib. So it too had to come out.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234208[/ATTACH]

    And then we took off the top of the fuselage skin to have proper access. By now very little of actual tail section was left. But we finally had a basis to work with.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234209[/ATTACH]

    After a bit of work the top fuselage skin was in again, and the framework of the vertical stabilizer started to resemble, well, a vertical stabilizer again.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234210[/ATTACH]

    So we decided we might as well put some new skin on it. Note that this picture is not 24 hours after the first in this post…
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234211[/ATTACH]

    Shortly after that we started off with the wing inspection. And then stopped and drank beer, because we found a large mouse nest, which has done some damage to the interspar area near the wing strut attachment – of course the most complex wing bit to repair. Still working on a solution, but I am confident it’ll buff out with some days/weeks of work…

    PS: the tail damage turned out to be because the rudder cable stops had not been refitted after its last overhaul in 1988 by a previous owner, leading to overstress damage of the tail. If you have a Prefect: check if these are fitted. It’ll save you a lot of work!

    in reply to: Seen on ebay 2014 #863556
    ericmunk
    Participant

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SZD-Bocian-1D-Glider-/141520327099?pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item20f344d1bb

    Bocian glider going for next to nothing. Great museum piece (due to apparent lack of paperwork).

    in reply to: DH.104 Dove Preservation Group #871528
    ericmunk
    Participant

    PH-ION registered to Iraanse Aardolie Exploratie en Productie Maatschappij N.V., Den Haag* March 29, 1957 (CoR 431) and named “Naft Safrid”; registration cancelled November 21st, 1963 as “sold to UK”. Was based in the Middle East at the time, mostly Iran.

    *) translates as Iranian Oil Exploration and Production Company Pty. Ltd., The Hague

    in reply to: The Even Newer (2014) Wot Plane? Quiz Thread. Rules In Post #1 #871950
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Koolhoven F.K.55?

    It is that ugly beast indeed.

    in reply to: The Even Newer (2014) Wot Plane? Quiz Thread. Rules In Post #1 #871966
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Cluetime: it flew once (briefly). Test-pilot resigned on the spot after landing and a heated argument with its designer.

    And oh yes, it’s European.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]233961[/ATTACH]

    Not a glider this time.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Baldwin ASP-XJ?

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,519 total)