More than just scrap I’d say: http://www.mustangsmustangs.net/p-51/?survivors/serial/44-13954
So what has happened to the aircraft that they don’t have room for, but were on display at the old site?
They are almost all (if not all) in indoor storage on-site.
And the good news is that Sgt. Keogh has now been formally identified, and will be buried with honours in the near future…
Stirring up trouble :dev2:
As far as they are concerned the National Military Museum is a step backwards.
Apparently there is less room now to display aircraft, and the storage area has now also become rather limited.
I’d say part of this is the old discussion of collection versus experience. Aircraft enthousiasts are happy to see a shed crammed full with aircraft, but these are just a handful of the visitors. Other visitors tend to want to see educational entertainment, which takes up money and space, leaving less room for hardcore collection but make the museum a lot more interesting to the general public. At NMM I am hoping to see a good mix of the two. Then there’s also the issue of combining several museum collections under one roof, which has less floor space than the combined collections used to have. This means choices have to be made what to display and what to keep in storage.
Granted, there are a lot less airplanes displayed than at the old museum, and as an enthousiast I am less than happy about that. On the plus side a lot more of the larger airframes will be under cover (some in storage), and the location is a lot more appropriate than the old one (it being the oldest military airfield in the country).
Meanwhile, it (still) says on the FAA Museum website:
‘In 2011 an agreement was formed between Newcastle based engineer Bill Smith and the ‘Blue Bird Project’ Team to handle the complex straightening and reformation of the crumpled components.
Bill Smith and his highly skilled team have been responsible for innovative reconstruction of Donald Campbell’s record breaking speed boat ‘Bluebird’ that was recovered from Coniston Lake in 2001.’ … ‘Bluebird Project team are highly skilled at reforming extremely crumpled, broken and often unidentifiable lumps of wreckage, back into usable components.’
Also, as Bruce says, are you being asked to fork up £50K, or merely insurance to cover that amount (very cheap)?
No matter the amount, asking volunteers to effectively pay for the right to do free (and very high standard) work for a museum organization seems counterproductive, I would think.
We did have the RAF flight manual for our Sedbergh in the files at Oxford. I’ll get one of the guys to check whether it’s still there.
But it was stamped “Restricted” (why?????????) so we might not be able to give it to you Dutch types!!!!!
Don’t worry David, we have clearance.
PS: I love the way the T38 logbook is labelled as “Glider and winged target servicing log”. Not much to shoot at there.
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/s/res?_q=AP4309A&_sd=&_ed=
Depending on where you are you might find a trip to Kew with a camera beneficial.
From my own experience, APs often are listed as “amendment” but are the full AP will all amendments up to that point.
Thank you, but Kew is about a seven hour ride (and a ferry trip) away, so that is not very practical…
Work has started on the port wing to see where we stand. Remember, this had been sitting in a semi-closed hangar, open to the elements. We knew the D-nose had suffered quite a bit from water ingress. Exactly how much, we now know. There are a few bits that require attention, with about a third of the D-nose needing a re-ply. Some ribs may be beyond repair having rotted away partially, and there’s a bunch of dodgy repairs thrown in for good measure.
When opening up the D-nose silly season set in.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]233464[/ATTACH]
It’s still there, together with a MiG-21 and some cockpit sections.
The C-119 centre section was slung in the pile and I guess it ended its days at Sandtoft . The Lancaster was civil registered at North Weald – acquiring a civil registration is no guarantee that any work has been carried out to start a rebuild ! It often just adds a little flavour !
Not just a flavour, but a very good start to getting all the paperwork and approvals in order. A necessity for any project.
Hello!
I used to fly in Leverkusen (between Cologne and Düsseldorf). My club (LSC Bayer Leverkusen) used to have two K 8s – a B and a rare C version. The B (D-0435, see photo) had the modified canopy.
K 8s with modified canopies, however, are quite common (at least in Germany) according to my experience…
Regards from Leverkusen
Thomas
Nice pic TDL! They sure are lovely gliders to fly. It would seem that yours is of the some mod as mine…
Try Ustí nad Orlici in your Northeast. There was about 35 of them there the last time I visited, with about ten flying. Overhaul facilies for a spraying company. Nearby Jicín saw another three flying.
Where did you fly this, TDL? The aircraft in question used to be a German one (D-8856).
I see that the International Vintage Glider Club rally has the go ahead to be held in the Netherlands next year. Excellent news. Maybe I can come & see your T21 in the process.
p.s Are you doing the spring or tab trim modification on the 21?
cheers
Dave
You’re more than welcome Dave, we’re only under an hour away from Terlet. A nice bad weatehr outing 😉
No trim tabs or springs for us. There’ll be two pilots, so we can alternate pushing/pulling the stick when we get tired…