McLean will be digging out their old new stock to see what’s there, just have been in contact. Fingers crossed.
L39. De Kooy?
David: Which is exactly my point: when its time comes, BN will be retired. Until then it’s an operational asset like all the other Chinooks… I would be surprised if historic relevance alone is a criterium for retirement. Hours, operational requirements (and associated costs), airframe life, etc. I imagine are much more relevant.
I photographed 3C-QQP in 2004 in the museum compound at Bankstown (Oz). What happened to that?
Yes shame they keep upgrading BN and not let her retire before something happens to her.
So who’s going to tell the poor sod under fire in Afghanistan or some other warzone that his evac is not available as it was deemed of better use as a museum piece? I don’t think so.
She’ll be lovely when you’ve finished! I’ll ask around at Feshie, they seem to have crashed several T21’s in the past>
Dave
That would be great, Dave!
No pics yet, but major progress. The aft/mid fuselage is all done except for some minor touching up work, strut attachments are back in, the whole of the underside of the front fuselage has been reskinned and the new CoG-hook structure is in, the metal bits for the CoG mod are all made up, and lots of small odds and ends have been done.
Next stop: stripping the cockpit and repaint it (after the new pulleys for the CoG hook are in).
Now, stuff we still need to finish the fuselage:
– Stabilizer strut attachments for the stabilizer spar (stabilizer sides only, bolts onto the spar)
– Stabilizer strut attachment carry-through for the fuselage (fuselage side only, this has been hollow-rivveted to the wood)
– Mid skid attachment (fuselage side only)
Anybody?
Can you tell me the identity of the Fauvel in your picture?
Sorry, no. A friend took the picture, actually, and he is tenacious in finding out the id’s of the planes he comes across, especially in France.
Whilst I should know better I just don’t seem to be able to resist! Based on the description of the ‘bitsa’, is it a Fauvel AV36? As to the naked frame and the lonely wing, I’ve no idea so I’ll leave those to others.
Spot on: a Fauvel AV36 which did not pass the glue inspection of the spars and was put up in the rafters. Two out of four isn;t bad, I’d say it’s yours (PS: the frame is an LCA Topaze used as the basis for a homebuilt project that never took off, the wing ia from a humble Schleicher K.8b).
No, and no (both have no tubular frames in the fuselage). The fuselage frame is more modern.
To give you a better impression what you’re looking at: the dark green stripe running from left to right just below the white/red wing is the front web of the wingspar of an allmost complete (and highly unusual) glider (the D-nose of the wing has been taken off from wingtip to wingtip for major inspection/repair work). The whitish thing just below the red wingtip of the hanging wing is in fact the extremely short fuselage/cockpit (sand nose cone), still attached to the wing (you’re looking at the aircraft from a 2-o-clock position). Visible below the left extreme of the hanging wing’s aileron is one of the two vertical tails of this glider.
As mentioned, there was one guy in The Netherlands who had his entire collection of panels confiscated following a house-call from police after a parcel addressed to him (containing instruments) was found to be ‘hot’.
Another guy importing a complete aircraft from the US had the whole aircraft impounded after a container scan showed the instruments were ‘hot’. After about two weeks and a bill of 3000 euros for removal of said instruments and disposal via a certified agency he was allowed to pick up the aircraft at the docks sans instruments.
Some continental Vintage Glider Club members travelling to the UK have for some years now been replacing their original instruments (luminous) with later ones (non-luminous) for a few weeks whenever taking their gliders (in trailers) to events in the UK due to scans of vehicles at the ferry terminal.
A tubular frame in a Breguet 901 would be something new (wooden semi-monocoque fuselage). Stabbing at a WA30 is always a better idea than actually flying or maintaining it, but it is not a Bijave. In fact, it’s not even a twoseater.
Right airfield (impressed!), right Bulldog. Now for the gliders: they are not the Neo-Samarian Nord 2000 (although its wings are in the same hangar, yes) and the C.800 (don’t know where that is).
The clues: the fuselage frame is a French glider. The wing is a German glider. The rest is a complete French glider (although it is a bit difficult to distinguish what’s what, it’s almost all there).
Oh, and Avion Ancien should be having a field day: it’s in France, although two of the types are not French!
Thanks, the resemblance to the CW-1 is striking, so it had to be the Buzzard, but on checking my vague recollection I could only find the latter version…
Here’s a picture with four different aircraft types (or bits thereof). I want at least two named, bonus point for three. Naming only the bottom one does not win you this wot-plane 😉