I would say this one:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/UK—Air/Bristol-175-Britannia/1263317/&sid=d9234f7d773724154c15d72d0e519d99
Search engines are your friend.
Richard,
It is the Akerboom-Schmidt T.10, PH-202, the prototype. The second T.10 was known as the Nijs & Van Driel T.10, which was later converted to T.20 (twoseater) and then back to single-seater T.10 III. The third was never completed (wings only built), the fourth was a club-built part fuselage which was later teamed up with the wings of number 3 but never flew. The beautiful quote of an instructor who flew the twoseater: ‘Space is limited in the backseat, but the aircraft has great potential for instructors under 1 meter 40 of length.’
Over to you.
Four built (construction of two never finished). First flown 1952. Not a single part of them survives to this day. The second one built was later converted to a twoseater. Steel tube front fuselage, aluminium tubular aft fuselage, wooden wings, European design.
It’s gone awfully quiet. More clues needed?
Another picture added for extra inspiration.
They did indeed. And yes, you’re guessing 😉
Maybe not.
The Sky’s a lovely aircraft indeed. Climbs like a homesick angel, handles well en glides pretty decent for a 1951 glider too. Only drawback is the atrocious visibility from the small canopy…
Funny, I actually have a Slingsby Sky. But no, it is not a Sky…
This one is not wooden monocoque fuselage, but steel tube with linnen.
In that case, here’s another glider for you. It’s not French 😉
There were significant differences – engines, tail shape, glazing, etc. If you want to call it a Caproni 309, fine. Only it wasn’t.
I’m going back to the Outhouse. Gliders ? Pah…..
May I remind you that any motorized plane is in fact a glider with engines put on? It has been that way since 1903 😉
Not only powered airplanes too. A worked out that my ‘hourly rate’ on a vintage glider I rebuilt from wreckage (current value divided by the number of restoration hours) was 32 Eurocents. Not a rate that would attract a lot of workshops to take such a thing on as a business:rolleyes:
And that’s without the materials and transport trailer building costs, which were about the same as the aircraft is worth nowadays anyway.
Welllllll, that was quick… Picture is a bit low-res, otherwise I’m sure you would have been able to identify the Jaskolka and Olympia 4 as well no doubt… Taken at Achmer’s VGC Rally, good times.
Thank you. Here’s the next. A glider of course 😉
Bonus points for correctly identifying the four gliders behind it as well. Naming the airfield will earn you even more respect…
Stinson-Faucett F-19