dark light

eagle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 1,837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-15N Sea Eagle #2587560
    eagle
    Participant

    A Few Other Points
    The study done by the North Dakota ANG, showed that an F-15N with two Phoenix Missiles had less range than the Tomcat with six Phoenix Missiles!
    The F-15N would not be able to fulfill the “fleet defense” fighter role. Mass formations of SNA, looking through powerful jamming, operating with autonomy are not performances the F-15N is good at.

    Which shows perfectly that the two fighters were designed with different missons in mind. The F-14 carries 4 of its Phoenix Missiles in a low drag arrangement under the fuselage – something only possible if you design your plane with that capability from the beginning. The smaller F-15 looses considerable more range when having to carry around those huge missiles.
    Also the F-14 is very efficient at low speed patroling with wings swept forward. This results in way more on-station time compared to the F-15 which is optimised for high speed fights only.

    in reply to: Drag Penalty of External Stores #2587975
    eagle
    Participant

    2 Minutes sounds rather optimistic. That would mean a very significant drag reduction. I have to check that.

    I agree, its a lot. Maybe the standard pylon data is from a US Navy Hornet with older engines while the Swiss F-18s all have the enhanced performance engine (something like 7700 vs 8000 kg of thrust i believe).

    in reply to: Drag Penalty of External Stores #2588698
    eagle
    Participant

    As you probably know, the Swiss AF developed a new AAM pylon for their Hornets.

    The improvements in capability are pretty good if you ask me:

    time to climb to 49000ft at Mach 1.4 carrying 4 AMRAAMs and 2 Sidewinders:

    Hornet with bathtub pylons: 7.5 min
    Hornet with low drag pylon: 5.5 min
    Clean Hornet would be at 4.2 min

    I got this data from a Swiss magazine.

    Found a pic here: http://www.rob.clubkawasaki.com/jas6079.jpg

    in reply to: F-16 Camo mock-up #2597380
    eagle
    Participant

    The Hornets digital camo reminds me of an F-16 in standard camo. 😀

    in reply to: Stealth v Radar #2597515
    eagle
    Participant

    Are you suggesting that perhaps the B2s get an escort to cover up the fact that their stealth capability is not that great?

    That would be possible, but i have no idea.
    I would say main reason for the escorts is to make it harder to collect B-2 rcs and/or ir data.

    in reply to: Stealth v Radar #2597632
    eagle
    Participant

    Thanks Flanker man, but it seems to me two Eagles escorting a B-2 are not exactly a perfect solution. 😉

    in reply to: Stealth v Radar #2597656
    eagle
    Participant

    The F-117 can be fitted with some kind of RCS increaser when necessary as for air show flights. My guess is the B-2 has something similar.
    However, i wonder why the B-2 always gets an escort since that incident .

    in reply to: F-18 E/F performance report #2601442
    eagle
    Participant

    But other programs have their strong points too. :diablo:

    in reply to: Detection range and BVR #2606031
    eagle
    Participant

    The better radar gives you not only range advantages but you can identify the enemy in an ecm environment or against ground clutter.
    On the other hand the F-15 might be able to evade the F-16 Radar more easily.
    And you can always play the hunter/killer game where one Eagle stays behind and illuminates the clueless Vipers and the other Eagles get close in radar silence.

    eagle
    Participant

    The F-15 was designed to counter the MiG-25 and as a more nimble replacement for the F-4 from the lessons learned in Vietnam. But these requirements were virtually the same, because the MiG-25 was thought to be a Mach 3 air superiority fighter (which it wasnt of course). The original requirements for the F-15 also included at least Mach 2.7 top speed.

    in reply to: ARH: Bell Wins!!! #2609324
    eagle
    Participant

    hehe, just yesterday i watched a docu where a young men from New York wanted to join the air force. The nice army recruiting officer showed a picture of the comanche. “Hell, if you have such a cool stealth helicopter, i will join the army.” 😀

    in reply to: F-35 JSF #2610306
    eagle
    Participant

    Well they have to be. Carrying lots of fuel, weapons, avionics and big engines surely needs internal space.

    Btw, does anybody know the fuel capacity of the F-22?

    in reply to: Rafale Spectra news….. #2610311
    eagle
    Participant

    The EFs movable intake might increase the RCS compared to the Rafales fixed design.
    But any difference becomes quite irrelevant once you carry any weapons i guess.

    in reply to: F-35 JSF #2611311
    eagle
    Participant

    Yes, they changed that during the last 3 years. 😉

    in reply to: Spotterday Florennes 14 July #2615922
    eagle
    Participant

    Yes, nice pics and looks like a great spotter day.

    But whats that IRIS-T under the F-16? Already integrated?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 1,837 total)