dark light

air-relics

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chippy WG471 #934252
    air-relics
    Participant

    This was sold by us for the previous owner, I think the new owner looks in here from time to time so hopefully he will make contact if he wishes.
    Also ‘Janie’ may be in soon who is the font of all knowledge chippie style.
    Hope this is of help to you.

    in reply to: Hurricane replica mystery #939044
    air-relics
    Participant
    in reply to: Hurricane replica mystery #939046
    air-relics
    Participant

    Not BoB film, I think they were all wood construction if I remember. Also I note the box frame looks in excellent condition and not that old.
    I hope this helps

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #960055
    air-relics
    Participant

    Is it not be better that with this sponsorship deal the Dornier is now safely on dry land and heading to be a standing memorial than the RAFM to have had to abort and the thing still sits on the bottom of the sea slowly turning into diluted minerals.
    Look how the Burma thread turned into a I told you so and this one cant.
    Good luck with further recoveries from the watery Museum around this fine land. sponsored by whoever it takes to get the aircraft up.
    one thing is to remember, the cost of this does not end now it is at Cosford so I am glad money is in place to continue and also the learning process of protecting, stabilising and finally display. whichever identity it turns out to be.

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #961254
    air-relics
    Participant

    Maybe also for a BIG reveal ?

    in reply to: Yale and Harvard Frames #961256
    air-relics
    Participant

    Hi Graham,
    I was just giving a simple answer that the tube frame I thought was the same on all BT9 against Harvard. yes various wing and fuse differences on Harvards but the BT9 I thought stayed pretty much the same.

    At lease Anna got the answer !”

    in reply to: Yale and Harvard Frames #961366
    air-relics
    Participant

    Hi Graham,
    I was just giving a simple answer that the tube frame I thought was the same on all BT9 against Harvard. yes various wing and fuse differences on Harvards but the BT9 I thought stayed pretty much the same.

    At lease Anna got the answer !”

    in reply to: Yale and Harvard Frames #962092
    air-relics
    Participant

    I think a common frame was used but wings, engine and fuselage length smaller in dimmensions

    Yale
    Engine: Wright R-975-E3; 9 cylinder supercharged radial
    Wing Span: 40 feet, 1-7/16 inch (12.25 m)
    Length: 28 feet, 4-5-16 inches (8.64 m)
    Height: 9 feet, 1-1/2 inches (2.77 m)
    Weight (empty): 3163 pounds (1436 kg)
    Weight (gross): 4291 pounds (1900 kg)
    Maximum Speed: 170 miles per hour (274 km/h)
    Range: 700 miles (1127 km)

    Harvard
    Engine: One 600-hp Pratt & Whitney R-1340-AN-1 radial piston engine
    Weight: Empty 4,158 lbs., Max Takeoff 5,300 lbs.
    Wing Span: 42ft. 0.25in.
    Length: 29ft. 6in.
    Height: 11ft. 9in.
    Performance:
    Maximum Speed: 205 mph
    Ceiling: 21,500 ft.
    Range: 750 miles

    in reply to: Fred Panton #966295
    air-relics
    Participant

    A salute to you Sir. Thank you for protecting the past for us all to enjoy for future generations.

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #1008911
    air-relics
    Participant

    It will go in a fresh water bath I would think first and whilst in some forms of cleaning as whats the point of removing the salt from the crustations and corrosion.
    keeping the Aeroplane very dry is a great way of stoping the chloride as the corrosion feeds from the salt and oxygen in the water. they also seem to have come up with a way of neutralising using natural acids and of course the strength will have to be spot on or it cannot work. conservation is top of the list to conserve as much as possible.
    As to what they then put over the aircraft to protect it, I doubt WD40 as there are other good protectants like a clear cavity wax that can protect, keep oxygen out and be removed fairly easily if needed.
    Main thing I see is keep it in a very arrid enviroment, look at the P40 in the sahara.
    Anyway, I am sure others here are much more experten on dar resdorazion of zee Dornier

    in reply to: Goodwin Sands Dornier progress thread #1009436
    air-relics
    Participant

    Exciting times again. I just wonder if there are similar treasures now waiting to come out of UK waters, salt and fresh.
    P.51 in a res in Essex along with HE111 in one of the Herts res.. Be nice to see another R for Robert type lifting.

    Good luck to all the team and calm waters.

    air-relics.co.uk

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 6 April 2013 #940463
    air-relics
    Participant

    I would not be suprised he reads here and may private you. He should be picking the Chipmunk up from us this weekend so I will bring it to his attention.
    Great to chat to but it was a shame we did not carry on our Spitfire conversation!

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 6 April 2013 #940626
    air-relics
    Participant

    Thank you to Andy and all the helpers, a fantastic day we had, very enjoyable indeed. We hopefully will be at Kenley in September.

    Hi Janie. We had a chat by the chippie. (we were selling it) sorry I had to break of our very interesting chat to serve some more customers.
    Also a big thank you to all our buyers, I hope you all went home happy.
    Col
    air-relics.co.uk

    in reply to: Shoreham Aerojumble – Sat 6 April 2013 #943330
    air-relics
    Participant

    We are looking forward to seeing you all after missing Old Sarum last month. We are loading up Friday afternoon ready to head down early Saturday morning.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)