dark light

nJayM

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,918 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 787 news thread #565673
    nJayM
    Participant

    Could not agree more on some of this

    ….. 99% of passengers don’t care what they are flying in as long as it gets them there along with their luggage.

    Whether the 787 becomes a great aircraft, well, we’ll see… in about 25 years time.
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m pleased the 787 has finally made it into service. The much vaunted and ridiculed at 9 month flight test programme turned into 2 years as many predicted but they got there in the end. Safely and without too much drama.

    By the way, most of the recent innovations in air travel have come from Airbus – not Boeing. When Boeing have tried something new the product is over 3 years late.

    Now the Sonic Cruiser, that was truly different, shame they didn’t have the nerve to go through with it.

    Hi Derek,
    Absolutely – correct most passengers don’t know which way the aircraft cockpit is and don’t care – why should they unlike us.:)

    I am going for 10 years rather than 25 years as the period after launch to see if the 787 is making good both in safety, cheaper all round and improving cash flow for it’s customers and Boeing of course.
    At 25 years in this consumer world they would have found some other toy/s even Boeing.

    Touche on the relief that the ‘plastic pig’ finally made it out of it’s stable and did not require a ‘humane gun’.;)

    Touche again on the Europeans having a lead on innovation. This has always been the case and post WWII – Dr. Werner Von Braun and team and US space (in a thread in GD on Mars) and it remains the case. British and European brains provide a huge wealth in R&D and innovation and not all of them wish to live in the US. Some do and make a huge wack.
    In the US we see the same complacency towards civil/commercial aircraft that Detroit has for years done with producing large chunky boxes which guzzle gas and run like whales
    Hence IMO the delay and ignorance by Detroit towards alternative fuels and alternatives to the ICE which the world has also had to swallow the bitter pill over.

    There are more than the plans for Sonic Cruiser in Boeing’s secret labs and drawing boards – but that is unfortunate but true that not all projects get the nod. Blame the bean counters (I am one too) as the ‘boffins’ would have wanted them to come to fruition.:D
    I am hoping to do my little bit to make that better staying with my dissertation topic of “The Accounting Standards that relate to Research, Development and Intellectual Property”.:)

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565676
    nJayM
    Participant

    Dash it there goes my application for an equity card

    Fine. Give us less of the drama, then.

    Hi Lance
    Dash it there goes my application for an equity card.:rolleyes:
    I was going for a second income for a revival of ‘It Ain’t Half Hot Mum’;)
    My annual renewal of my professional accounting registration documents came through by snail mail yesterday I shall stay with it with a focus on the real aviation industry.:cool:

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565682
    nJayM
    Participant

    I think that the entire manufacturing process is a whole new experience

    I think that the entire manufacturing process of the ultra large sections is a whole new experience (notice no use of the word era). It was reported that the ‘kiln’ (yes the word used was the same as for a potter making pottery) used in Italy (I believe) was having to be duplicated (a year or two away as the Kiln itself takes that long to be custom manufactured at mega expense).

    Duplicated why, because some guy in the assembly chain decided he/she would not adhere to routine procedure and there are several sections of fuselage needing re done/rectified (maybe it was a Friday like in the motor industry – urgent need of Chianti I guess):rolleyes:

    Hence the need for a duplicate (mega expensive) kiln to cope with rectification work.

    Yes it is a new manufacturing world for these ultra large sections and this will be the change the aviation industry may go through if the majority or near ‘all composite’ aircraft get safely through customer handling in the next decade.

    I remain optimistic.:D

    in reply to: British holiday jet lands in wrong place #565687
    nJayM
    Participant

    Amazingly that in the 1980s was a waiting to happen …

    Amazingly that in the 1980s was a waiting to happen mistake/accident.

    The A4 – Great West Road and finals in to LHR coming in near parallel between Perivale and Hounslow West and now further on the Tube.

    In those days A4 – dual carriageway – amber street lights hung either side of central reservation lampstandards – in bad weather – do I need to say the rest.

    A4 certainly not a taxiway (back up runway) – can you imagine the carnage and loss of life if that mistake had become a real tragedy.

    I am hoping that this story that I opened the thread with is bad or speculative journalism and that the taxiway was an authorised line up and landing. It is only Yahoo and the Metro (hah) that I can find a reference to this story with the emphasis on the word ‘story’ (maybe a ‘fairy story’)

    If not the carnage could have been also very serious if another aircraft used or crossed the taxiway at the wrong moment.

    If it is coincidental luck – then a roasting and suspension is in order as they are probably a British Flight Crew who should know better to take chances with a landing line up.

    If this report is true when we have all the modern instruments in cockpit and in/with ATC on the ground and this sort of ‘sh.t’ happens. It isn’t an uninhabited island they landed on.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565903
    nJayM
    Participant

    Aah! Managers that population explosion of turds

    I have a horrible feeling that the concerns (not just of mine, but of many other engineers working on the programs!) will become acutely clear over the next few years.

    When engineers are being forced to meet unrealistic timescales by managers who understand the technical issues only on the most abstract level, who in turn have been forced into a corner by marketing people and airlines insisting that composites be used, it is not inductive to a good environment to make an aircraft using new and potentially dangerous technology.

    I’ll be delighted if I am wrong though – but I fear MSR777’s comparison with the comet may prove grimly apt.

    Aah! Managers that population explosion of turds – perpetual meeting attendees.:mad:

    I hope though MSR777’s comparison is wrong.

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565906
    nJayM
    Participant

    Now there’s a man with a heart like mine

    I’d love to be, and had considered going down that route.

    Test pilots can play with parachutes… not that it would make much difference in the failure scenarios envisaged.

    Hi Amiga500
    Now there’s a man with a heart like mine.:cool:

    God help me (he/she doesn’t anyway) if I’d want my slippers while sipping cocoa by the mock gas fire and watching aunty beeb every night. No I’d rather be out there doing something sensibly planned with an element of risk.:)

    I am not sure though in civil test flying if a parachute pack is part of the regulation safety issue. Maybe on the very first flights but how would one get free of the aircraft to use it.I honestly think John Karriker would have commented in the many interviews he gave.
    In military test flying and commissioned military flying a parachute pack/ejector seat is standard

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565911
    nJayM
    Participant

    Really?

    I (along with many others) am going to be actively avoiding both of them for at least the next 10 years.

    That settles it you’d never wish to be a test pilot I guess :rolleyes:
    I know I would.:D

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565913
    nJayM
    Participant

    Wee guys creating invisible dents and not reporting

    The bu!!sh!t approach to dealing with potential problems.

    You reckon some wee guy on $3/hr out in, I dunno, pick anywhere, could be in India, could be China, could be the US (ok, bit more than $3/hr then), Europe wherever… is gonna admit to knocking into the aircraft if he doesn’t see a dent?

    “Managed” :rolleyes:

    You sound like your about 16 years old putting in a sentence like that.

    I fear (as do many others) Boeing, Bombardier and Airbus have jumped 5-10 years too soon. They are all using badly understood black-metals to build their aircraft ‘cos the marketing “gurus” dictated so. Its a bit like Intel with the Netburst Pentium… and we all know how that worked out.

    No I wish I was 16 years old (again) as a year later I would start flying to gain my CPL and this time I would complete it and maybe fly the Dreamliner. I’ll go buy a Chinese Fortune Cookie or maybe the Japanese do an equivalent.:)

    You obviously are better in your strategy planning than Boeing, Airbus and Bombardier and what may I ask have they said in response to your feedback to them on their premature choice of badly understood black-metals.
    I hardly think your response would be from the head of marketing though.

    You may be voicing genuine concerns and only time will tell if these aircraft will be safe or be like the Comet.

    About ground handling, all I did was reflect the video material shown after the preliminary training visit the Dreamliner made to Japan and its purpose was for ground staff to become familiar in new methods and techniques.
    If you are convinced none of these people (wee, medium or large guys):) that are trained will adhere to the training and will clear an aircraft with (invisible) dents to leave the apron, well again it’s something you should pass on to Boeing.

    Well now that makes me determined I want to fly on the 787 as soon as I can afford a flight.:D After all I have flown in Austers, TigerMoths, Dragon Rapides why not in a plastic pig?

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565916
    nJayM
    Participant

    I’ll have less of the ‘queen’ bit …..

    Stop being a drama queen, Jay! :rolleyes:

    Do you think the moderators have nothing better to do?

    Hi Lance

    I’ll have less of the ‘queen’ bit and I don’t mean Her Majesty either;)

    in reply to: 787 news thread #565936
    nJayM
    Participant

    Apologies if I said the wrong words

    You seem to have problems with those who don’t agree with you. If you are not keen on posting items on which some may hold a different view, you should perhaps not post at all. That would certainly get my vote. 😉

    How come you answer my post with sarcasm and yet agree with Flightmech who said the same as I did? :confused:

    The 787 is not a new era in civil aviation. 99% of passengers don’t care what they are flying in as long as it gets them there along with their luggage.

    Whether the 787 becomes a great aircraft, well, we’ll see… in about 25 years time.
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m pleased the 787 has finally made it into service. The much vaunted and ridiculed at 9 month flight test programme turned into 2 years as many predicted but they got there in the end. Safely and without too much drama.

    By the way, most of the recent innovations in air travel have come from Airbus – not Boeing. When Boeing have tried something new the product is over 3 years late.
    Now the Sonic Cruiser, that was truly different, shame they didn’t have the nerve to go through with it.

    Arthur

    Apologies if I said the wrong words that offended you. I was a pilot remaining avidly interested in aviation, unlike you who still is from what I gather a pilot.

    If the general consensus of the moderators and members is as you state and is that I stop posting I shall.

    Please ask the mods to PM me directly on this subject.

    I do not intend to convert the success of the 787 going commercial into a personal slanging match. There are too many threads that have been closed because of this occurring.

    I respect your skills and knowledge and I hope that’s absolutely clear.

    Kind regards

    Jay

    in reply to: British holiday jet lands in wrong place #566077
    nJayM
    Participant

    Maybe I am plumb stupid but is this a serious incident or not?

    Maybe I am plumb stupid but is this a serious incident or not?

    Are taxiways surfaced routinely to take a landing in an emergency?
    And was this a non emergency (bl..dy stupid mistake) coincidence that the taxiway was suitable and fortunately there were no injuries.

    I have been told in some airports taxiways are specially re-surfaced to provide an alternative temporary runway if the main runway is being repaired/re-surfaced.

    The fact that there have been no comments on this incident means either that this is commonplace or no one is interested.Great so all the training, licensing and type ratings of skilled pilots are useless “as land anywhere policy” applies.

    What about ATC, runway markers in contrast to taxiway markers was the pilot oblivious to these things?

    in reply to: Airbus A380 At 50 #566094
    nJayM
    Participant

    Honestly the two of you Lance and Sandy!

    I agree.

    There’s hardly a mention of Boeing in the entire thread! :rolleyes:

    Honestly the two of you Lance and Sandy!;)

    Fancy leaving me out of the mirth.;)

    Well I guess we’ll soon know exactly when the aircraft assembly line workers go to the ‘John’ next and for how long as they may be part of a time and ‘motion‘ study.:rolleyes: MrTotty they are coming your way – you love the aircraft but don’t want details of toilet breaks and such ‘crap’ – I fully understand

    Once the 787 flies out later today I shall put the upto date Boeing orders and deliveries charts in their rightful thread – not here

    Oh! I mentioned the un mentionable word on this thread.:eek:

    in reply to: 787 news thread #566104
    nJayM
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree more

    Composites are certainly not new. I guess the only difference is that the 787 has a higher percentage of them. Bleedless engines. We’ll see how they pan out.

    It will be interesting 15-20 years down the road to see how the composite holds up after moisture ingress and delamination. Going to take a long time to go around that puppy doing a coin-tap test;)

    Hi Flightmech

    I couldn’t agree more with your comments.

    A higher percentage of composites than anything civil in commercial use at present.

    It will have it’s learning curves in faults, defects and enhancement management as the years move forward.

    That’s tending towards intelligent Development preceded by Research following customer feedback and usage (rough, not so rough and gentle):)

    I am sure many sceptics similarly pooh poohed the canvas and wooden string bags, wooden, all metal as much as they did fantastic aircraft like Concorde, and many military greats – tough they can go poo.:p

    in reply to: 787 news thread #566108
    nJayM
    Participant

    [QUOTE=talltower;1800062]Article excerpt from Aviation Week

    Air India Has No Money To Buy Boeing 787, Says Aviation Minister

    Debt-ridden national carrier Air India does not have the funds to pay for the 27 Boeing 787s it has ordered, Civil Aviation Minister Vayalar Ravi said Sept. 9, a day after the country’s nodal public auditing agency flayed the state-run airline’s hasty expansion plans.

    “The decision to acquire a large number of aircraft was risky and has contributed predominantly to the airline’s massive debt liability,” the comptroller and auditor general (CAG) said in a report sent to parliament on Sept. 8. The fleet acquisition process also took an “unduly long time,” the CAG said (Aviation Daily, Sept. 9).

    Ravi, in reacting to this report, says that the delivery of the 27 aircraft had been delayed by Boeing for three years. He did not specify whether the order would be confirmed or canceled, but made clear that if these aircraft were delivered, there is no money to pay for them.

    http://www.airport-data.com/images/aircraft/small/621/621360.jpg

    Air India Boeing 787-837 – A Flying Dream That Won’t Come True

    Source: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aviationdaily&id=news/avd/2011/09/12/12.xml&headline=Air%20India%20Has%20No%20Money%20To%20Buy%20Boeing%20787,%20Says%20Aviation%20Minister[/QUOTE]

    And what were we supposed to believe in posts around the time the Trent 1000 at RR Derby suffered an uncontained failure on the test rig, that AI were suing Boeing for delays of the 787 to the tune of billions.
    I slung it back saying that AI were just on an attempted rip off money making gangster heist against Boeing but could very well have leased some 777s in the interim if it was customer revenue they wished to gain.

    Sorry I have no sympathy and they aren’t the only outfit out in those parts that will be in global financial trouble. See previous public scandals e.g. Satyam, etc and maybe the days of global creative accounting are truly seeing the buffer stops.:)

    I certainly hope poor Land Rover don’t get slung on the skip in a few years due to similar financial mismanagement.

    in reply to: 787 news thread #566116
    nJayM
    Participant

    Sorry I spoke – but please see my post #36 above

    Sorry I even spoke, Arthur

    Please see my post #36
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1794068&postcount=36

    Engines Trent 1000 – training, maintenance and probably in many customers’s cases in the first instance are being very ably managed by Rolls Royce, until the GE engine reaches certification stage. This isn’t a show stopper in problems IMO.

    The process for constructing the 787 fuselage and wings is a complete all new method and no other civil aircraft of this capacity and range at present has this high a percentage of composite in it. e.g. They aren’t rivets they are fasteners holding sections together.See post #36

    That is why ramps, loading platforms, and ground service are being managed a ‘tad’ differently and so will repairs to any external fabric damage be different at customer locations or back at Boeing.

    Apart from that as a pilot since you know everything, I shall say no more apart from saying Boeing have pioneered another phase (since the word era is causing so much displeasure) of unique civil aviation and the rest will be followers.

    Having been employed by Cray Research a unique world leader (certainly in my day and to an extent still today) and the Boeing 787 has had 800,000 hrs design time on a Cray Supercomputer (see my post #34) – IMO the 787 will be a global leader for some years.:D

    Go Seattle;)

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,918 total)