See what you think, it makes a refreshing change from conventional aircraft artwork..
VERY nice – and unique.
I concur, refreshing.
JJ
This (attached) would be one of those Boeing-built Sharks (un-attributed original 5×7 print from my collection)
There’s also a great photo of the one and only Boeing Totem on page 194 of the soon to be released (on press next week) Larry Milberry project “Aviation in Canada – The Formative Years” (volume 2 in a series) – CANAV Books. How do I know the Totem is where it is? Easy – I’m the guy the put it there during design/production of said book.
James
local news (Belleville Intelligencer) report with 2 photos
Here’s the message Kevin W. Moore sent to the members of Jet Aircraft Museum – The T-33 Group Group of Canada – JAM. (Facebook)
“Subject: T-33 Accident at CFB Trenton
Hello All,
There seem to be a number of version of what happened with T-33 #648 (US reg N3648) at CFB Trenton today (July 15, 2009). In an effort to put incorrect information to rest, this is a brief as to what seems to have occured. I was there to photograph the departure of 648 so I can offer an eye-witness account. In relative brief, this is what I saw and/or know:
The T-33 was piloted by Col David Graben. Take-off from Runway 24 was approximately 12:12pm. At approximately 20′ altitude, the left armament bay door opened. The pilot made a split second decision to abort the take-off and aggresively put the airplane on the runway with a little less than 2000′ remaining. It appears the left tip tank, then the possibly the right tip tank contacted the runway. The left tip-tank split approximately 1/3 the way down from the leading edge, spilling fuel as the airplane continued to roll down the runway.
Col Graben, realizing the apron was quickly approaching, departed the tarmac to the right side of the runway on to the grass in order to avoid the ILS and cement pilons. The airplane did not appear to be slowing quickly and then disappeared from my view behind a fence.
When I reached a point on th eapron where I could see the airplane, it had come to rest approximately 1 metre from the boundry fence, between the parimeter fence and Boundry Rd, sitting in a ditch.
The pilot exited from the cockpit with some assitance from a bystander who, apparently, hopped the fence. Fortunately, and most importantly, David was uninjured. The status of the airplane, at this time, is unknown. Obviously, it has sustained some damage but it may be some time before how much and how severe the damage is, is known.
Thankfully, nobody was hurt or, worse, killed. There was no fire. The airplane was not destroyed. Whether it is possible that the airplane ever takes to the air again, I am not in a position that would allow me to speak to that. Time will tell.”
cheers!!
Wieesso, great specs, thanks for the post – I’ll be looking up the AAF site soon… although I’m still confused – were those ‘Tokyos’ filled externally or by ‘overflow’ whilst filling the mains. If the latter was the case then someone really f*cked up since the feed lines and vent lines on those Tokyos had been severed (undocumented prior to delivery to the RCAF)… (I’ll scan and post the pic of the severed lines – and I’ll quote Leigh’s memoires regarding the feeds and vents at the same time)
Al, thanks even more… I think I’ve known at least two individuals who’ve been involved with “Canada’s Wings” – mostly through my long past IPMS Ottawa days… but Stittsville is barely a 2 hour drive for me, so hopefully someone may still be around.
As a side note.. RCAF.com posts a pic of 9202 in Italy on Dec 30/43.
Leigh (O/C 168(HT) Sqn.) had left Rockcliffe (in 9204) on Dec 15/43 with stops in Dorval and Gander and onward to Prestwick. (Bruce Middleton was captain, S/L B.G. Smith (co-pilot), F/O Jimmie Irvine (engineer), F/O La Brish (nav), F/O Dickinson (w/o). The original plan was to have mail directly (via England) from Canada to the troops in Italy in time for Christmas – almost but not quite – landing at Foggia on Dec 29 in ‘9203’, having left ’04’ in the UK for repairs to those fuel lines
I’ve been doing a ton of work for CANAV Books on the latest series commemorating the Centenary of power flight in Canada. Volume 2 (barn-storming/bush-flying/early airlines and charters) will be released soon. We’ll be launching into production of Volume 3 (1924 – birth of the RCAF and wartime) in the next few weeks.
and don’t forget the light-weights – the yellow peril…. (a few static shots from Saturday). Trenton and the yellow birds go wayyyy back – its was amazing to see so much yellow on the static display (5 Harvards, 1 Yale, 1 Cornell or 2?, 2 Chipmunks, 2 Tiger Moths, and 2 Finch)
James
a nice piece…
Looks familiar – how similar is the RAF’s T.2 to the Hawk 115 (CT-155) being flown over here for the CF and NFTC?
JJ
…
– Central Australia Aviation museum located in the old Connellan Hangar, which includes wreck of Keith Anderson’s Westland Widgeon G-AUKA ‘Kookaburra’
Is this the wreckage that HAD been displayed at Panorama Guth (before the 05 fire) in Alice Springs? I’ve got a shot of this particular wreckage somewhere in my ‘stash’ of travel pics.
I remember seeing that one in all blue G-SARK …
elmo.
blue???
just leads me to a major all-encompassing question… just what colours do we all see?? (having argued online and in person over several colours over the years)
if the ‘Omani’ bird is the one cited… well, thats grey
JJ
Moroccan Mirage F-1 Modernized by ASTRAC..
I’m in love with the colour scheme!! – I guess its time to crack out another F.1 kit and start at it.
A quick Googling turned this up in an excerpt on Google Books – the very same photo (albeit cropped) is used in the book.
“P-47 Thunderbolt Aces of the Ninth and Fifteenth Air Forces”
By Jerry Scutts
(page 13)
The photo is credited as (IWM HU 76214)
Aircraft is P-47D – coded IA-V (sorry, no serial quoted)
358th FG
Pilot in photo: Lt. Milford C Peterson (367th FS)
Aircraft was the usual mount for Capt Robert Schuster of the 366th FS
In this case… the poor designer, probably on a Friday afternoon, stuck a Spitfire on the cover, switched his computer off and went down the pub…
well, therein lies part of the problem… I, as a designer (having nothing to do with Osprey) actually know a few things about aviation – and have designed and produced more than a handful of aviation titles – I eagerly exit my ‘office’ for the nearby watering hole, but professionalism dictates that nothing ‘wrong’ ever goes to press from my desk.
JJ
I didn’t even read the title of the book!! all I saw was a really bad painting of a Spit.
No, it is the Hohenzollern!:)
Hohenzollern… absolutely yes!! many a CanForce aircraft was photographed there… from CT-133s though CF-104s to CF-188 Hornets.
I may be stating the obvious, but…
Orthochromatic negative film was the norm and Panchromatic was the rarity.
I’m sure many others here on the forum can further substantiate this, but basically ‘Ortho’ has (had) a sensitivity to blue and green colour wavelengths.
Even 20 years ago when I was slaving in a ‘dark-ages’ studio shooting PMTs (photo mechanical transfers) the film was Ortho, which is why all our base artwork was in ‘non-repro’ blue (somewhat close in shade to mid-20s RAF roundel blue) and we retouched all the negs with black or dark red.
Don’t let your perception of today’s RAF roundel blue deceive you (WWI roundel blue was not as far as I can tell nearly as dark as even WWII and modern roundel blue and 1920s roundel blue was by contrast, very light in tone) – to Ortho film, blue is blue (as in almost not there) and it is no-where near as dark as red could ever be – and red to Ortho is barely 5% lighter in shade than black – but black is always black – even the slight ‘tweak’ in levels in P’shop will show a difference. If I remember this correctly – you can replicate Ortho today using commercially available, run-of-the-mill BW neg film by utilizing a Cyan lens filter.
The second photo compounds matters, in that while it was obviously shot with Ortho film, it has been reproduced (lithographed) at least once and now suffers from a moire screen pattern which has degraded the image to a point that no real information/detail may be gleaned from it.
For me its easy to see, 2 volumes worth of turn of the century to 1930 images in the last year – simple, but then confusion reigns on another of my projects – I still haven’t figured out why 1960s day-glo ‘red’ appears white in some prints and mid-grey in others – I’ll save that for another day/thread.