ohhhh, tailfin root fairing… CR.42??? (up IS forward, right??)
Anyone have photos of BEARs actually bombing?? I’ve seen the BUFF doing low-level, high-altitude and ALCMs but never seen anything of the BEARs dropping more than a KERRY (i think)
you have my ddepest sympathies!!! …. i’m speechless (oh and the Swiss Guards at the Vatican are better dressed)
shaking head… oh, oh, oh
WAAYYYY back in message 009
Goin’ wayyy back, these are just to help clarify/illustrate…
U.S. Army PC-9
USAF SF.260… Elementary Flight School – U.S. Air Force Academy (civilian reg)
ohhh, now I get it… those are in response to “glhcarl’s” other interesting designations… it took me a while to figure out – brain not functioning properly tonight… mmm, friday
Anyway… Fury, Skyray, and Tiger all saw series production and fleet service.
they’re going, going, gone
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123020112
It was especially nice to see the ‘Hanoi Taxi’ in her original MAC colours going to the AF museum.
a couple more pop-outs for you, and ‘111 crew capsule (slightly used)
http://www.aero.cz/main.php?pageid=136&news_home_id=438
can’t quite tell if its a live test that Aero was doing or a dummy – still looks good sitting in the grass with the tow bar on it.
And now some of my favourite Hornets…
20 Years in CF service
Tiger Meet of the Americas
439 Sqn low-viz Tiger
[QUOTE=fightingirish]Nice dart board!!!
Two stars, 1 Nato and 1 crown, how much points do I get??? 😉 :diablo: 😀
180!!! next round is on you!
what is going on with the world??? ugly as sin.
Another case of design by committee, or some paper pusher’s secretary felt artistic.
Why not keep national roundels and slap an EU flag on the tail… OR, what happened to the EU military force… oh, wait, its called NATO… silly me… use that and slap your own flag on the tail… oh well the bureaucrats will decide..
I’m still shaking my head… and I don’t even have to see it that often!
Rotten luck… but excellent bouyancy!
What ever happened to the Boeing Skyfox? I thought it was a pretty decent looking job at the time. Then there’s the Canadair CL-84 Dynavert – purely experimental – but didn’t the technology go further with the Hiller/Ryan/etc. XC-142?
Grumman XF10F Jaguar… variable geometry, all flying tail… 1952
112 ordered, cancelled in 1953, only 1 built and flown. Somewhere in this dungeon I’ve got more pics and info from the old Wings or Airpower article from back in the 70s
I’ll accept that!… maybe it was just me, but when I first saw the pics of Thrust SSC, the one thought that kept going through my mind was… ‘Wow, looks like a chunk of Buccaneer…’
How about Canadian ‘104s … 421, 417, 439 and 441 Sqn.
Its too bad they never painted the one that flew with the Golden Centennaires in 1967… drawings were done. I’ve only seen one painting of how it might have looked.
James