dark light

contrailjj

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,053 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2572995
    contrailjj
    Participant

    The Il-102 was a ‘private venture’ design from Ilyushin – to try and make a jet-powered version of their most famous design – the Il-2 ‘Shturmovik’

    It was a re-hash of a previous attempt – the Il-40 ‘Brawny’………….

    Both were outmoded concepts – with rear gun turrets and internal bomb bays.

    The much better Sukhoi T8 (also a ‘private venture’) won the day and has evolved into the potent Su-25 Frogfoot.

    I don’t have any drawings to hand – but I made a model of an Il-102 – to go with my Il-40 ‘Brawny’….

    The whole Il-40 build is at :- http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/models_pages/modl_il-40.html

    Ken

    Ken,

    Very impressive build! I still haven’t ventured into resin. Fun subject matter ‘though.

    James

    in reply to: the century fighters #2573339
    contrailjj
    Participant

    From what I understand, it was part of the engineering staff that went (not so much the technology) and were especially instrumental in the development of the LEM for the Apollo missions.

    As for that movie??? I shudder to think that anyone without the ‘joy’ of viewing the CBC actually saw it.

    in reply to: Czech AF's SU-25s #2573340
    contrailjj
    Participant

    How about having one of your very own?!?!

    http://www.prideaircraft.com/su25.htm

    in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2573378
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Well, if TSR.2 can join so can the CF-105 – nuf said.

    Anybody have more pics or drawings of the Il-102?? – the Russian equivalent to the Northrop A-9 wasn’t it – as in losing out to Su-25

    in reply to: the century fighters #2573389
    contrailjj
    Participant

    And you do have a Commie fighter for your avatar…. 😉

    …can’t help that… just one of the better airshow shots I’ve taken 😉

    in reply to: World Aerobatic Teams – help wanted #2573655
    contrailjj
    Participant

    and today the Red Arrows

    in reply to: Shockwaves and 'pulling vapor' #2573791
    contrailjj
    Participant

    sweet!

    Here a a few ‘twists’ on vapor courtesy the C-130 and C-17

    Saw the ‘twisters’ from the C-17 at a show a few years back – just can’t find the photos.

    in reply to: Shockwaves and 'pulling vapor' #2574521
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Exactly what I was thinking…

    (the big one is a USN shot)

    in reply to: the century fighters #2574608
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Hooray for the ‘Clunk’ at least she did get exported! And , if my memory serves me correctly was the first all-weather interceptor in NATO service.

    Arrow technology in the ’25?? you never know, the place was full of spies. Even a couple years ago there was still a politico south of the border calling us ‘Soviet Canuckistan’… ahhh, small minds

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2574610
    contrailjj
    Participant

    interesting points… definitely dependent on aircraft shape, relative humidity etc.. but the ’16 is ‘pulling’ vapor as opposed to shockwave.

    starting a “shockwave/’pulling vapor'” thread…

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2574838
    contrailjj
    Participant

    Hi, can you say how you can tell ? Thanks.

    on this one shot, the easiest clue it that the ‘vapor cone’ only appears to be on one wing… if the aircraft were indeed near-sonic (like the Super Hornet) the entire rear of the aircraft would be inside that ‘cone’, meaning the vertical tail surfaces would be in shadow.

    Hope that helps

    in reply to: World Aerobatic Teams – help wanted #2574851
    contrailjj
    Participant

    How about some green – just the mood today…

    Great link for a Saudi hawks vid from Al Ain show 2005 – nice signature at the end with smoke palm and swords.

    http://patrouilles.free.fr/index.php?page=meeting&sub=22

    Link also has Russian Knights with Swifts, Marche Verte other neat stuff – still haven’t checked out the whole site.

    in reply to: the century fighters #2574922
    contrailjj
    Participant

    I say it looks more like another cancelled design, that does for Canadians what the TSR2 does for the British.

    I’m in agreement with you there BIGVERN… still a case of apples and oranges but the similarity between the F-108 and the CF-105 Arrow is striking (more so than the TSR.2) The Arrow was amazing, but I’ve grown to get over it. Its still an amazing story – up there with TSR.2 national pride and having the rug pulled out from under you. Still, some nice bits and pieces at the Canada Aviation Museum in Ottawa – Nose section, and outer wing panels being the largest.

    Might be neat the check the development dates onthe 108… the Arrow technology went all over the place after ’59… engineering into the Gemini and Apollo space programs… The Iroquois engine went to the UK and the progeny went into Concorde… but please, no debates on the Arrow… thats been done to death.

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2575480
    contrailjj
    Participant

    [QUOTE=HuntingHawk]I remember someone saying the ‘LCA going supersonic’ pic and producing the shock wave cloud around it might be a fake because the phenomenon did’nt occur at cloud level ? Well here’s a pic of an F-18 doing the same at cloud level.

    http://frontierindia.com/album/cpg134/albums/userpics/10001/normal_LCA_Flutter.jpg

    Frontier India

    …Fake! and a bad one at that… .
    I’ve done more than my share of Photoshop work (its part of my job)

    in reply to: World Aerobatic Teams – help wanted #2576239
    contrailjj
    Participant

    and while the props were still spinning… Silwer Valke… PC-7II

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,053 total)