And why you think that i’m blinded by anti-US propaganda?Did i say who is the winner?No……And from this forum:
“The radar signature of the F-22 is improperly reported to the GAO and The Congress.Only a single data number is provided to congressional committees and the GAO—the average radar signature in the level forward direction within 20 degrees off the nose, presumably to enemy fighter radars (In a B-1B report to the Congress, the signature was similarly malrepresented. A reported 100/1 radar signature advantage over the B-52 became a real 1.8/1, an advantage that proved to be of no importance). One cannot design an aircraft to hide from low and medium frequency ground radars and from high frequency airborne fighter radars, all of the time. Properly, radar signatures should be portrayed and reported for all aspects—all azimuths, and all “latitudes”—and for all radar frequencies. Single data suggest mendacity by incompleteness.” Also:
“Fighters cruising supersonically are beacons in the sky to the various infrared sensors. Ramming the air at high speed and generating supersonic shock waves creates temperature differentials impossible to hide.” And:
“Fighters, with radar to search for and find enemy fighters autonomously, at long ranges, cannot hide their high powered electric emissions to modern, sophisticated, Russian equipment. The Russians excel at this art and export their equipment to many nations. Further, F-22 detection of enemies by radar is an inverse fourth power phenomenon, while detection of the F-22’s radar is an inverse square phenomenon, giving the advantage to the enemy.”
You and many F-22-rules fans may disagree but everyone has a right to have a opinion……..
Sign In
