They did not have contruction numbers the serial number is used for all construction. When the Victor B2 was converted to the K 2 HSA/BAE used “SET” Numbers. I presume that the Valiant and Vulcan were using similar system
Having been associted with the Victor for many years I could not find anything concerning Contruction numbers.In any publication or service correspondence only the relevant Serial numbers were used
It was stated many years ago that British military aircraft do not have construction numbers. (Source Unknown). Things to-day are probably different?
Way back in late 1978 I lead team to RAF Sculthorpe to dismantle the Mirage 1VA and a T33 for the IWM Duxford. Apparently all those from the French Air Force went to RAF Sculthorpe. We had no facilities apart from what we brought with us and were not allowed to leave our aircraft .
Trenchard Brat
A small reference table of Inspection Stamps of Allied Aircraft Constructors:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230578[/ATTACH]
The ### invariably denote the individual Inspector’s identifying number.
The Victor was built by Handley Page so why is it missing from the listing
It appears that the author of the you are quoting from book missed it out???
Having seen film of the fun time had by all concerned in refitting one on the Victor I can understand how they figured a bill of £1000 if the system was similar. I recall it looked they were feeding a giant white sausage into the chute bay then the final touch is that one guy stamped and jumped on it to get it to finally in place whilst the other members of the team stood and watched.
Having fitted quite a few chutes in a Victor whilst on a night stop at RAF Luqa and others. What you describe was the correct procedure it took a good kick to get it into the Hopper and the doors shut over the drogue bag not forgetting to remove safety pins.
The chute and shackle weigh about 170lbs and the system is all hydraulic, The two doors are spring loaded and held by retractable bolt that opens the doors. Disconnect this and retract it The Chute had a life of 25 streams and was scrapped after that. The Victor had a minimum landing distance of 7,000ft and the streaming of the chute was mandatory except if the runway was over 10,000ft e.g. Goose Bay
Two experienced rigger could load a chute in 10-15mins from unloading it from the Land Rover up giraffe at the correct height. Shackle in and locked in. Chute in one door closed, remove safety pins close other door reconnect retractable bolt tow the giraffe out of the way and sign for the fitting NO pyrotechnics involved.
Having seen Vulcans landing at Akrotiri and Luqa I never saw a chute streamed. The only time I did was whilst working at Fighter Meet at North Weald in the 1980’s and early 1990’s. The Runway was only 6000ft and the streamed on every landing I watched them fitting a brake chute and the time taken was well in excess of the average Victor Refit. the chute was similar to that of a Victor, but the shackle was Chrome Plated. I have both in my collection
Lancaster Landing At Duxford
Which presumably means that you won’t be landing at Duxford either.
The BBMF Lancaster landed at Duxford after Jacko Jackson Retired early 1980s and I presume that it still lands there
Trenchard Brat
It was supposed to be coming when I went to Chateaudun? to collect the Mirage 538 way back in mid 1995 and it still has not arrived not even by road!! It will be long wait. Just wait and see
I was unaware that the Canberra was fitted with Orange Putter I thought it was only the V Bombers. So why is it needed?
Two ex WWII type winches a 4000lb and a 1000lb were used to raise and lower the Main Engines on the Victor Mk 1 and 2 versions. The 1000lb was also used to lower the very large bomb Bay tanks of the three point aircraft. They were Known as Bomb Winch’s. I don’t have a picture but used both when I was at RAF Marham with the Tanker Wing
Reply to thread
Roger thankyou very much for your kind suggestion about writing my own book. I have also been advised by several Professional aviation persons to do just that. Therfore your encouragement is appreciated. I’m sure you will agree there is room in the market for a good Victor book. I have indeed been fortunate to have access to many documents on the subject, and spoken to many who served on the Victor force. Their tales deserve to be heard. Indeed I was having a very good conversation today with a B1 AEO his tales were facinating. Maybe when I’m closer to completing my manuscript you can help with reccomending folk to proof read etc, to help me make sure of my accuracy?
Thanks for your kind support.
Good luck with a book on a different side of the Victor to me. I will see what I can do to help when you have reached that stage.
Roger
HP Victor Part no are 80——–
26DE all versions of the Victor B1 B1A, B1A(K2P) Two point Tankers, B2 including the Blue Steel versions, B(SR)2 K1 Tankers, K1A Tankers, K2 Tankers.
Some were I have a break down of the Part Numbers for parts of the airframe etc
Hope this helps
Roger Brooks
Many thanks Ian for your comments on my book. I therefore suggest that you write your own as I did and correct all my errors as suggested to me over 20 years ago by a very good friend in the professional aviation world and I did as he said.
Thanks again
The actual wingspan of a Victor K2 was 117 ft not 110 ft that was the span of the MK1, the B2 had a span of 120ft. The span was reduced on the K to improve the stresses. The Victor could carry a 35,000lb conventinal bomb load in the Bomb bay which was 14 more than a Vulcan. Fuel wise she could carry a 128,000lb fuel. That’s in the tanking role. But rarely did so I believe.
A far as I can find out the K2 never took of with 128,000 lbs of fuel as the aircraft was Not cleared for that load, but during the Falklands Campaign when airborne and at operating height they were topped up by another tanker who then returned to Wideawake. See my book for all approved loads in Volume 2 It might have well been done at the AAEE but not confirmed. Heavy weight Take Off’s trials were carried out by HP and HSA at RAE Bedford .
Roger Brooks
I think that you will find that the majority of Civilian registered use Electric Start probably using a 112VDC Electric starter From DH Comets
Having looked up my copy Malcolm Hobart’s book and comparing it with my own history the Author should have contacted The RAF Halton Apprenticed Association for the correct data on their badges and hat band colours and finally the discs used behind the Beret Badges are the Wing Colours and NOT the Course, finally the discs behind the wheel badge are the three Squadrons in each wing. Along with a few more errors.
Are you sure about this? The E brevet was not used until 1942, before that flight engineers were given the rank of Sergeant and awarded an air gunners brevet signifying their second task. The AE brevet was a 1960’s designation (Airborne Electronics) not aircraft engineer.
Badges and uniforms of the RAF by Malcolm Hobart ISBN 0-85052-739-2
Whilst Serving on 205 squadron in 1968-70 at RAF Changi. We had a Flight Engineer wearing the AE Badge whilst the rest of the Engineers wore E. I saw him many times in his flying suit but his name escapes me. We also has AEO’s and AEOPs wearing that badge