then the oil pressure would have dropped very quickly preventing him from feathering the prop
I’m not so sure that a prop can be feathered on a ‘standard, typical’ single engined warbird!
I’ve certainly never seen a picture of one in said scenario either, but I am willing to be corrected?
Why does everyone need to try and look clever the IWM statement says “In preparation for the Flying Legends Air Show and The Duxford Air Show,” and so covers both legends and the earlier show are you sure they haven’t just put it back up to inform people? Yes could be better worded but maybe they couldn’t afford the back office staff due to a lack of money taken through the gate?
Steve, I’m not quite sure the angle for quoting against my comment, as I was merely trying to point out in response to charliehunts post that although it looks silly to quote the incorrect dates, it did name the relevant show.
The IWM posting does not cover the earlier show, (The D-Day show), and Flying legends show as you have read it, it actually covers the flying legends show and the ‘main’ airshow in September which is why the listing is in that order.
I read it as that and you as something different and on that basis you can see how easy it is for the likes of you and I, where information appears not quite correct, to read a difference.
There is no excuse for any ‘officially issued’ notice by an official body, for it not being wholly correct though.
I’m sure the road closure application notices relating to these dates will not be incorrect, otherwise they would simply be rejected.
Free loading is a big pet hate of mine I attend lots of events during the year and even pay to take exhibits to certain shows as I wish to see them continue, but why do people really think it is their right to stand on other peoples property and not put any money back towards the sight they are obviously enjoying?
Speaking as one that has some involvement in public events, I have to agree.
Surely Grange Road is always closed for airshows?
That would make sense. Perhaps it hasn’t been prior to now?
Posted on the 17th June announcing road closures in May. Mmmm……
It does indeed look silly.
However as it does specifically mention reference to Flying Legends show, clearly someone has not fully read what has been posted prior to posting and avoid their own embarrassment. Perhaps whoever it is doesn’t suffer from embarrassment.
The Robert Rudhall “Battle of Britain – the Movie” at an eye-watering £350.00!!! 😮
Ridiculous price. Even so I hope it was a signed copy? If not, that would make it an even more ridiculous price.
That said, There will be someone that will happily be prepared to pay that price, which is their prerogative.
The engine sadly has it’s data plate missing. From what I can find out it is from a Sikorsky H34 helicopter and the r1820 fitted with this model carb were the -84, -84A, -84B and the -90. The engine appears complete and in good condition.
Thanks for that
Could the two fuel lines at the top both be vapour returns?
Thanks again for the help.
I don’t necessarily think so, all the PD12’s I have seen (not your model specific, but it appears to be quite similar in lots of respects) generaly seem to have the fitting on the left just blanked off. some don’t even have a fitting, they just have a simple blanking plug inserted into the carb body itself.
Bomberboy, many thanks for the information. Any help is really appreciated as this is all very new to me and manuals/diagrams of the PD12R1 appear to be few and far between!! Thanks again for the help
No problem, glad I could help.
WRT the fuel feed line, I have seen this line supply both the priming system and the fuel pressure lines on some installations, so it sounds like you have the right bits going to the right places.
What dash # 1820 is it and what is the installation fitted to or from?
If I am able to help further, you only need to ask and I’ll see what I can do.
Making a comparison with a slightly different version of the PD12, I can offer what I think these connection points may be, but of course they may be different.
Starting from the top left, I think this one is normally typically blanked off.
The top right is what looks to me to like is the return to tank line (vapour etc).
The line with the arrow pointing to it could be the live supply feed to a priming system via a solenoid, or it could be a dedicated line to a fuel pressure gauge transmitter…or it could do both at the same time.
The large hose that you indicate is indeed as you have interpreted, it is the fuel supply and is normally connected to an engine driven fuel pump.
The round disc held in centrally by a single bolt which is located below the incoming fuel supply on the right is the cover to the carb fuel strainer.
I hope this is of help to you?
On 10th May 1945, days after the European wars’ end, two Fortresses collided mid air over Braintree in Essex. This resulted in one aircraft crashing killing all on board and the other escaping with no loss of life.
Both aircraft were based at Kimbolton in Huntingdon. The journey that was being undertaken was a return trip to the United States and therefore not all on board were air crew. Some are believed to have been ground crew.
Admittedly I have not checked up on this, but I would be more inclined to think that this trip could have been a ‘cooks tour’ rather than on the journey home. Braintree from Kimbolton is completley in the opposite direction that they would have needed to go.
On top of that, the war had only ended, officially, what 2-3 days before, which seems is a bit too quick to already be making their journey back home.
None the less, it is a worthy project and I wish you all the best with it.
Which area of Braintree did the aircraft crash in?
Looks like the trailing aerial, but that is normally situated further down in the waist gun area, just before the step around the turret, in this photo it appears to be located in the radio room, also the shape looks a little different than what I have seen.
I think you are right.
Because the frequencies used required a long aerial. Trailing aerials were common on RAF types of the same period. What does surprise me is that this has not been more visible in other photos of B-17s.
I’m sure I’ve seen this on Sally B and I’m sure that someone on here would be able to post such a view to confirm.
How far out does it go? Surely this would get caught up in the other bombers in their tight formations?
I saw at least a dozen (a mix between SHAR’s and GR’s) at Culdrose during the summer being used for this very reason.
Perhaps they could call the September airshow ‘the Operation Market Garden Anniversary show/airshow’?
Certainly would seem to make sense to me!
Do operators make much money from film or tv work?
I can’t see what the point would be if they didn’t.
Filming of Memphis Belle saw one aircraft lost and several blown engines.
I know of two blown engines, so what were the others?
a Television Drama series based on the book of the same name by Donald Caldwell.
Who? You Mean Donald Miller I take it?
It certainly looks like an american bulkhead fitting, but in fairness could have come from anything manufactured on that side of the pond.
the finished item has the missing square panels behind the cockpit – possibly some sort of radiators?
http://www.westpacrestorations.com/index.php?page=p-47-thunderbolt
The two doors on either side allow for regulation of the intercooler air to pass through.