dark light

snafu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 3,597 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Reverse Spitfire fund? #1010971
    snafu
    Participant

    Hope this doesn’t start a round of pussy jokes…

    in reply to: Small Access Hatch To I.D. Please #1010979
    snafu
    Participant

    Any part numbers/inspection stamps visible ??

    There are no numbers on it at all that I can see and I have gone over it with a loup.

    ;o)

    in reply to: Our Brussels Air Museum ; #1010984
    snafu
    Participant

    Um, is that an authentic colour scheme???

    in reply to: General Discussion #262286
    snafu
    Participant

    But the serious domestic dispute sound alike…?
    If it wasn’t you then someone…lied to the police. You could get shot for less than that in some countries.

    in reply to: A very Happy Police Incident ! #1863297
    snafu
    Participant

    But the serious domestic dispute sound alike…?
    If it wasn’t you then someone…lied to the police. You could get shot for less than that in some countries.

    in reply to: 1 FTS Chipmunk crash #1011938
    snafu
    Participant

    Hi,

    Thanks for all your replies. As far as I know the Chipmunk was recovered by a Belvedere so it may have been repaired and put back into service.

    Alex

    That would mean it was (mainly) one lump without bits hanging off; probably ripe for a rebuild rather than scrap.
    I suppose there is no listing for damage rather than write offs?

    in reply to: 1 FTS Chipmunk crash #1012746
    snafu
    Participant

    Is there a possibility that the Chipmunk was not written off, maybe just damaged, repaired and returned to service?

    in reply to: General Discussion #262602
    snafu
    Participant

    Which might mean that you find the BBC to have a more left wing bias than that poles average…?;o)

    in reply to: BBC political bias #1863683
    snafu
    Participant

    Which might mean that you find the BBC to have a more left wing bias than that poles average…?;o)

    snafu
    Participant

    Hopefully one day with the aid of the ever improving technology and a brave recovery team of divers etc.
    that this could be achieved…. Sooner rather than later…..

    Except for the apparently forgotten but very important fact that since the majority of the aircrew involved in this tragic exercise died these wrecks would rightly be regarded as war graves.
    I am sure more knowing forum members than I can put you right on whether a war grave can knowingly be recovered, improved technology or not.

    in reply to: Just how rare are Merlin engines? #1014349
    snafu
    Participant

    All those who say that building new Merlins is simple might have grabbed the wrong end of TonyT’s stick (oo-er!).

    Top that off with the only people that hold the drawings are never going to ever release them and you are on a hiding to nothing.. Rocket science would be relatively easy in comparison.

    The drawings sound like they are held by people who “are never going to release them“; it might be more opportune to ask why not and how much would change their minds – and that might be the sticking point.

    Also, what happens if the design owners, whoever they are, do not allow their design to be built? Do you just ignore them and carry on? Do you make slight adjustments so that it is not exactly the same and give it a different name? I am interested to hear…

    in reply to: Next Channel recovery #1014357
    snafu
    Participant

    Is there a need for a Ju88?
    The Dornier was a Phoenix, risen again from its ashes, but whilst we are not exactly swimming in Junkers neither are they as rare as once they were. Whilst there might be enthusiastic sponsors or lottery backing (if they still have money after raising the cost of a ticket) for retrieving something from extinction, there will be little interest from the financiers for something they can already see a version of at Hendon. Therefore you are looking for a philanthropic multimillionaire willing to raise and conserve it, and there will be precious few of those about.

    in reply to: General Discussion #262803
    snafu
    Participant

    I cannot comment on the claims you make for how Sky operates as they appear to be hearsay but I do not discern the right wing bias you assert.

    Indeed it is not my experience, but that of a relative who slowly eased a story from a source for her copy. You don’t complain too much if you want to move upwards from a weekly news sheet to the heady heights of what used to be Fleet Street.
    And a bias is subjective – when I were a lad a friends dad insisted that The Sun was a working class newspaper for the working man (both true, subjectively) and therefore backed Labour. Even when it backed Thatcher, published the infamous last one leaving turn out the lights headline, and bad mouthed the unions during the miners strike he still believed, then he had a heart attack (unrelated) and the paper never entered the house again.
    Sky News bias – look at the studio guests: although not as bad as Fox News see if you can notice the carefully guided questions designed to take the programme in the direction that the company wants it to.

    A survey from 2010:

    Nearly two-thirds of respondents (64 per cent) said Sky News displays a clear pro-Conservative bias in its reporting. In total, 34.5 per cent of respondents said Sky News displays a “strong Conservative” bias, while 29.3 said the channel shows “some Conservative” bias. One per cent of respondents thought Sky News displays a pro-Liberal Democrat bias, there was zero suggestion of any support for Labour and only 9.1 per cent of respondents said Sky News shows no overall bias.
    http://themediablog.typepad.com/the-media-blog/2010/04/uk-media-bias-bbc-channel-4-sky-itv-politics-brown-cameron-clegg-230270410.html

    in reply to: BBC political bias #1863837
    snafu
    Participant

    I cannot comment on the claims you make for how Sky operates as they appear to be hearsay but I do not discern the right wing bias you assert.

    Indeed it is not my experience, but that of a relative who slowly eased a story from a source for her copy. You don’t complain too much if you want to move upwards from a weekly news sheet to the heady heights of what used to be Fleet Street.
    And a bias is subjective – when I were a lad a friends dad insisted that The Sun was a working class newspaper for the working man (both true, subjectively) and therefore backed Labour. Even when it backed Thatcher, published the infamous last one leaving turn out the lights headline, and bad mouthed the unions during the miners strike he still believed, then he had a heart attack (unrelated) and the paper never entered the house again.
    Sky News bias – look at the studio guests: although not as bad as Fox News see if you can notice the carefully guided questions designed to take the programme in the direction that the company wants it to.

    A survey from 2010:

    Nearly two-thirds of respondents (64 per cent) said Sky News displays a clear pro-Conservative bias in its reporting. In total, 34.5 per cent of respondents said Sky News displays a “strong Conservative” bias, while 29.3 said the channel shows “some Conservative” bias. One per cent of respondents thought Sky News displays a pro-Liberal Democrat bias, there was zero suggestion of any support for Labour and only 9.1 per cent of respondents said Sky News shows no overall bias.
    http://themediablog.typepad.com/the-media-blog/2010/04/uk-media-bias-bbc-channel-4-sky-itv-politics-brown-cameron-clegg-230270410.html

    in reply to: Mig 21 warbird galore flying around in Florida? #931908
    snafu
    Participant

    Maybe not, but those who have been trained to fly those aeroplanes would know its quirks, wouldn’t you say?

Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 3,597 total)