The way the media and leaders of the other parties are picking up on every anti-UKIP story they can, tells us one thing.
They are really frightened of them.
[Rolls eyes like a mad man] No, the reason the media is picking everything up is because the other parties are all being bland and protective of themselves – there isn’t much news about at the moment. Anyone know what Labour is up to at the moment, other than either agreeing with the ConLib pact or (trying to) shoot them down?
And as for anti-UKIP story – are you seriously joking? All those stories are being supplied by UKIP themselves! (Guffaw!)
Which ones – in your opinion – are made up or maliciously hounding an innocent candidate by media/other political party? The stupid bigoted tweets about Lenny Henry? The other stupid bigoted tweets about Islam and Miliband not being British? The Irish immigrant model posterboy? The poster woman who turned out to be Farage’s personal assistant? How about the UKIP MEPs employing foreign assistants in Brussels rather than Britons? Maybe the floods being caused by gay marriage? (Chortle!)
What do you really expect the media to do, totally ignore that wonderful golden egg-laying turkey that’s fallen into their laps? No way – when life hands you lemons then lemonade shall be made and UKIP is helpfully churning out lemons by the tree load! (Tee hee!)
That is what i feared.
Just as long as it is still legal currency by the time it reaches me…
Why? Are you planning to go round and beat him up, if he says yes?
Why, is that what you do?
Seriously that would never have entered my head; are you so wrapped up in violence that it is immediately what you thought? What does that say about you?
Or maybe get the thought police to come calling? Quite frankly, what he thinks is none of your business.
Indeed, and you may defend his word with your life – but care still needs to be taken due to the Race Relations Act 1976 (et al) which outlaws discrimination on racial grounds and oversees relations between people of different racial groups. Telling somebody ‘of colour’ to go back to ‘another country’ on the basis of their ‘colour’ is frowned upon by law.
Who appointed you judge, jury, and executioner in all things political, may I ask?
Ho ho… Since my views are different to yours I must be the enemy – and that of all the right-thinking, decent, hard working man in the street too.
We thrive on discussion – but there needs to be discussion otherwise you will just go about discussing bloody Top Gear all s0dding week… My view is contrary to yours: therefore discuss why I am your enemy. Please?
You trawl through the news, picking out controversial items, then sit back, inviting comment, while waiting to pounce on anyone who doesn’t share your jaundiced view of certain political parties/personalities.
Well done. You have worked out my game plan… I find a subject and try to kick off a discussion and one this one you bit!
Now, pick a subject of your own and discuss. Or would you rather sit there looking at a dead forum?
Thanks to people like you, with their excreta-agitating behaviour, we can no longer even call a dog by his given name from 70 years ago.
(I can imagine you sitting there, foaming from the mouth, jabbing a finger at your monitor and hammering on the keyboard! Tell me I am wrong!!!)
And we can’t enslave people of a different ethnic minority, call them ‘monkeys’ and worse, we can’t lock up people of differing religious views for no reason anymore (although we can still invade their countries), we can no longer act like gods with power over life and death – just like we used to in places like South Africa and Rhodesia 70 years ago.
Just because these things used to happen, just because such names were used at one time, doesn’t mean that it was right then nor right now. Example: is it right to call somebody a cxxt? Do you call people that? Is it right to call women that? I don’t, I am disgusted when I hear it happening YET that word was once part of a common name for a thoroughfare where prostitutes were to be found in the middleages (see Gropecxxt Lane on Wiki). The name you refer to was once common, but it is now regarded as offensive by the authorities and by ethnic minorities – explain to me why you think this word and the one above are no longer in common usage by decent, considerate people.
Snafu you epitomise the point behind my earlier post. Thank you for helping to substantiate it.
Just because you’d ban the word racist wouldn’t make the problem go away. What would you replace it with?
If you don’t think the other parties have racists and other, worse things making up their numbers, you obviously don’t know politics.
There is racism (sorry Charlie) in everything and everybody if you look hard enough. UKIPs little Hitlers are not difficult to find since they seem to be proud enough to wear it like a badge and spout it in the most inappropriate places. Have a dig and find some in the other parties, please.
Strange how no one is slating Lenny Henry for the racist comment that started this. If racial quotas aren’t racist, I don’t know what is?!
So, let me get this straight, if someone says there are not enough ethnic actors on TV they are being racist? If there are not enough ethnic police officers on a force and someone points this out, is that racist? Would it have been racist to ask about the pre-apartheid governments ethnic make up in South Africa?
Unless you are referring to something else here you are being rather silly – did someone take away your crayons?
I’ll be voting UKIP, because we need a change in the established order in this country. The current lot aren’t working, and a Labour government would be a complete disaster for the UK, as they have always been.
Good of you to share.
A quick question then. Do you agree with Henwood that Lenny Henry should go and live in a “black country”? Despite that fact that Lenny Henry is as British as you or I?
You will not get an answer from them. Not what they really think, anyway.;o)
You might get a politically correct answer, even though they’d insist they don’t do politically correct…
Saying that there should be more black/ethnic minority people in the entertainment industry is hardly racist.
Unless you are black, of course, eh j_jza80?;o)
If you think UKIP are in any way a change from the established parties then I’m afraid you’re sadly mistaken. Public school, City working, ex-Tories are not a “change” from anything.
UKIP are certainly different in that they are vastly more incompetent than the other parties – by some margin.
Don’t forget the refugees from the BNP…
I have been working since i was 16, and voting ever since.
Um, shouldn’t you have been voting from 18…?
In 33 years i have worked under the Tories,Labour,ConDem governments and i have to say i have no faith in any of them.It is all too institutionalised ,1 v 1 entrenched blame culture.
I know – welcome to politics. Isn’t it great?[/sarcasm]
I am personally fed up with the lot of them so how should i vote?
That is between you and the ballot box, but if you ask people you will get the benefit of all their prejudices thrown in too.
But you could find a party that you agree with, explore their policies, make sure their working out works out, and put your tick in their box on polling day. It is up to you whether you read the papers and discover what their membership really want, what silly things they tweet and believe, and whether their lies are as believable as the other parties lies…
All the comments about the bad things about UKIP ,well lets do some likewise digging into some of the Labour,Cons,LibDem candidates past and present –not so pretty either.
Yep, but that’s what happens. To be in politics these days you need to be either whiter than white or come clean before you get discovered and just brazen it out. Those stupid enough to tweet crass statements about ethnic minorities show that the Darwin effect works in political circles too.
People died for the right to vote but the right to vote for a decent way just isn’t available [realistically].
The right to vote for a decent way? What does this mean? Would you rather we had a system like that used in North Korea – one man, one vote, one winner, no choice?
I agree: party politics in Britain is utterly pointless because ‘they’ win no matter who gets in – but UKIP is not the answer, they are still a ‘they’. Party politics in Britain is governed by a certain ‘type’ of person with a certain mindset, who won’t change anything because that might make his/her job redundant; it is self protection.
So who do i vote for ? No vote won’t change anything so guilty of keeping things the gruesome same.
If voting made a difference they’d outlaw it.
Oh, forgot that Farage tried to distance himself from his own previous election manifesto by declaring it
‘drivel’!
http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/seriously-rise-UKIP/story-20903848-detail/story.html
What a guy…
Anybody surprised about this?
Lenny Henry racism row candidate quits UKIP
A UKIP council candidate has resigned his membership of the party following controversial remarks about comedian Lenny Henry.
William Henwood tweeted that Mr Henry should emigrate to a “black country” and compared Islam to the Third Reich.
He did so after the comedian said there should be more black and ethnic minority people in creative industries.
UKIP said comments by Mr Henwood, from north London, did not represent the party’s views.
A party spokesman said it had been “mutually agreed” that his leaving the party “would be the best course”…
Still, in the interests of fair play and spreading the doom and gloom of politics across a broad spectrum…
Former Tory MP Mercer resigns after Commons suspension
A former Tory MP has resigned after he was suspended from the Commons for six months for allegedly asking questions in Parliament in return for money.
Patrick Mercer said he was “ashamed” and had decided to “fess up” by standing down straightaway.
This will trigger a by-election in his Newark constituency in Nottinghamshire, which he has represented since 2001.
The UKIP leader Nigel Farage has said he will decide in the next 24 hours whether to stand in the by-election…
(Notice how I managed to get Farage in this bit…;o)
I can see him in the role, I can’t see Russel Brand as Pike…;o)
You don’t think there will be more silliness from the UKIP candidates tweeting more of their inner thoughts, then?
Only that you delight in attaching labels to others, while having no evidence to support it.
Labels such as…?
And bringing down the full majesty of the law onto someone simply for saying something is the behaviour of the bigot; if you can’t persuade, simply by the power of your rhetoric, someone of the wrongness of their behaviour, then leave the floor clear for someone who can.
I was merely indicating that care needed to be taken; it was not me threatening Charlie, no matter what you might assume.
Who said anything about enemies? You do not figure large enough, in my life, to assume such a mantle; there are far too many, on the net, who, like you, hide behind a pseudonym, make provocative statements, then, when someone reacts, produce the wide-eyed innocent “Who, me?” reaction, and continue to answer a question with more questions, solely with a view to getting an angry reaction.
My views are not the same as yours, nor many others here; I am well aware that I am kicking the status quo – hence enemy. I am happy to back up any of my ‘provocative’ statements and have not, as yet, resorted to acting the wide-eyed innocent.
If it doesn’t include your “stimulating conversation,” most definitely. Not far from here is a thread, with a member desperately asking for help with a personal problem, to which you have made not a single addition (helpful or otherwise,) which lends weight to my conviction that you only enjoy stirring things up, and have no real interest in your fellow man.
I am well aware of Lincs problems (just because I haven’t posted does not mean I don’t read it. Think about all those threads you haven’t posted on – are they invalid too?). I cannot believe you’d think I would go and add to his woes by posting something unhelpful on there; maybe it is your own subconscious planting seeds in your mind – it is not mine.
Maybe I have not made a post on there because there is nothing I can add that someone else has not already said, maybe his problems echo a situation of my own in the slightly less than recent past (a situation which I have no wish to ever go back to, what with having very little recollection and only the hearsay of others to refer to), the scars of which were not just mental…
We all have had problems over the years – it is called life and it is something we have to deal with, one way or another. Some can ask for help from people they don’t know and others can not. Either way I wish him all the best; if there was anything I could do I would at the drop of a hat, but my own ‘lifeskills’ are not going to help him at this moment.
Oh, and getting back on message as far as the thread goes… Yes I have an interest in my fellow man – I am one for a start, drawing attention to a political party which does not appear to have an equal interest in all the inhabitants of this country. Can you say the same when you would happily offend a proportion of the country over the name of a black dog in 1943?
applause: Nice try.
Not really an answer though. Was I wrong?
Please indicate where I’ve said that we should.
Well, I was speaking generally but if you want to take that responsibility on your shoulders…
Just in case your education has been incomplete, do look back to the Latin word for black, and you’ll find that the word, to which so many object, is nothing more than an Anglicised version; are you planning to rewrite the Latin-English dictionary? Webster’s already been that route.
Indeed, but the use it was being put to – that we are referring to – is about skin colour, which is offensive to those of colour. And that favourite South African offensive slur ‘kaffir’ also has roots that are non offensive, yet language lives and moves on. Just because it was once not offensive does not mean it is possible to reclaim it now – ask your black friends.
Never have, never will, even in response to provocateurs like you (and note that you were the one who introduced it)
…um, introduced to illustrate the point about language living. I did not, nor would I, refer to you (even after your provocation) or anyone else by that revolting term.
It was a common word to describe a particular shade of dye/colour, but its incessant use by the dregs of society–
Which in particular? I forget which but one of the early C20th kings was apparently quite partial to using the word in its offensive capacity, calling an ethnic servant or boy to him with the word in a manner displaying a complete lack of irony.
Royal dregs?
-as a means to insult others, has made it unusable.
So, you have no problem with the people to whom your word refers being offended? In fact it was reclaimed in America by ‘gansta rap’ acts of the 1980’s purely to offend, and has seeped into general usage there since – but only for African Americans.
Strange how the “f” word also used to be considered beyond the pale, so much so that I would never consider using it in front of a woman or child, yet the “entertainment” industry’s never-ending use has made it acceptable (though not to me – one example, and off goes the TV.)
So… You are offended by the ‘f’ word (another word which has origins in the middleages, if not further back), which at least illustrates a term to procreate, and want less use made (which I am all for) yet want the ‘n’ word, a word currently used (in Britain at least) for no other reason but to offend, reclaimed because it does not offend you? Like I said, language lives and moves on.
“I can imagine you sitting there, foaming from the mouth, jabbing a finger at your monitor and hammering on the keyboard!”
It was an observation, and I did ask if it was true…
Ah, I see; it’s alright for you to assume something about me, but not the other way round.
If you like. Not sure where it is written, so you’ll have to take it on the fly…
Opponent will suffice; as I said, you do not have enough status to qualify as an enemy.
You being a rank 5, you mean, and me a lowly 3…
Qualified psychiatrist, are you?
Ha, no. So no need to worry about paying for your consultation. Yet.
And maybe a word from a fellow sufferer just might help a little, but let’s think only of oneself.
You do not know me, you will not know me and for that I shall be forever thankful. Just what exactly are you doing a wonderful job of assuming I was ‘suffering’ from?
It does seem strange that you are stirring up trouble on this thread by – being a troll – repeatedly dragging Linc’s thread in and calling me selfish in an attempt to get a reaction.
If you think that doing so is in any way helping him then you are surely deluded.
We all have had problems over the years – it is called life and it is something we have to deal with, one way or another. Some can ask for help from people they don’t know and others can not. Either way I wish him all the best; if there was anything I could do I would at the drop of a hat, but my own ‘lifeskills’ are not going to help him at this moment.
Hang on, this sounds strangely like finger trouble, and it ain’t mine…
Yet another assumption; I do not “happily offend” anyone (I leave that to agitators like you.) I can, though, regret that misuse of the word has led to its fall from legitimate use.
Misuse by…who? It is an offensive word: There is now no way on earth that you can incorporate it into a conversation with people you are not familiar with without them drawing conclusions about you for using it. Under those circumstances the only person who be misusing the word would be you. Can you come up with a legitimate use for that word, one that doesn’t cause offense or rouse a moderators ire?
Do stop stirring, there’s a good boy.
I’m stirring and you aren’t answering a simple question. Guess you might be hiding your feelings by being patronising and not answering…
I already have; there are some of us who can discuss this with “them,” because they know I genuinely want to know how they feel.
‘Them‘? Good grief. Did you use your special voice for the hard of understanding as well?[/sarcasm]
But well done you(!), although I cannot call your bluff due to the nature of the question (it being on a thread in a forum). I can tell you that mine were not happy with the way the ‘n’ word has been bandied around and were quite uninterested in its history. Out of interest I had to explain about ‘kaffir’ which, although they’d heard it, was taken as a stereotypical slur rather than something deeply offensive. Incidentally it was one of my friends who showed me the king-thing in a book on racism in society.
Then why use a word you would never use, which has to be a classic case of double standards. Interesting that I am now the provocative one.
Maybe you are tired but I have already stated that I was using that to illustrate the changing of language… Do keep up.
And since when have royalty been known for having finer feelings for any of the lower strata of the populace?
Dregs of society was the term you used, I believe. They come from both high and low social orders – another attempt at illustration of a point that appears to have gone right over your head, I’m afraid.
And still you assume, with no evidence whatsoever, but, if you wish to believe the worst of someone who doesn’t immediately kowtow and genuflect in front of your eminence, who am I to protest against it?
I do not need you to kowtow, genuflect, whatever. If you want evidence then walk down Brixton high street loudly using that word and sooner rather than later – if you do not look too threatening – you will engage in a conversation with someone from an ethnic minority about what that word means to them (if you look threatening you would probably ‘converse’ with several, followed by the police, who will be happy to restore peace and harmony to the area). The ‘kowtowing’ has been done by them for several decades, where they have endured racial taunts with little response from the police and just had to ‘suck it up’. Recently there has been more of a willingness to show that they do not have to accept that they are second class people and hide their feelings.
In the first part:- Offended by its overuse, in fact, which shows a particular lack of imagination on the part of modern writers, but have no issue with its use (in the right context and male company, only) in times of high stress (used it myself, but usually under my breath, or when alone.)
Hurrah for you…!
But I mentioned it because the offence that the ‘n’ word causes can be just as offensive as the ‘f’ word in the wrong location.
In the second part, you’re assuming (yet again.) I have no wish for a word to be “reclaimed,” if it offends, but I’m perfectly free (however it might hurt your sensibilities) to regret its demise in normal everyday life.
So, again, when would you use that word, with all its offensive and racist baggage, in normal everyday life?
Oh, and I was joking about Russel Brand as Pike.
The new St Trinity’s movies…
You didn’t really take to either the originals or the remakes, did you…?;o)
(It’s St Trinians! Were you thinking of Trinity in the Matrix flicks?)
To generate a world audience the story is to be transferred to the east coast of America, where the team will be recast as Auxiliary Coast Guard watching for German submarines and spies.
In addition to those already named:
Corporal Jones will become a Sun-bleached former beachboy (his mahogany-tanned face is amusingly complete with permanent sunglass silhouettes around his eyes and on his forehead) from the west coast, played with the character of a usually laid back, potentially foul-mouthed (using the weirdest of words as heavily emphasised expletives) surfer-dude who has smoked one too many of his frequently offered around (but never taken up) home-grown and very potent ‘jazz sticks’ and is prone to get excitable in the many times of crisis. He will be played by Jack Nicholson, and frequently talk about his woody much to the consternation of the others.
Pike‘s part is to be played by Robert Downey Jr, but renamed McHarry Achmed Winckelstein III, and will be portrayed as an African American whose inherited name originates with his family’s original but confused slave owner. A jibbering, whiny man-child with an unhealthy fixation on big women, Winckelstein is nevertheless fantastically brainy and many capers are to be had with the team trying to prevent him being taken away by the police (for bothering the local matrons) or by military intelligence to work on potentially war-winning projects whilst he is more eager, for example, to dress the local large ladies up as skimpily clad mermaids to entice German submarines ashore.
Godfrey will be recast as the oldest member of the unit and feature Harrison Ford, in a wheelchair and with corn-cob pipe, as a former cowboy who rode with Roosevelts Rough Riders in the Spanish–American War, with many insightful memories of the late president and namesake of the teddy bear shared through his bourbon-infused haze. In every show ‘Gabby’ will refuse to talk about the night he discovered his hero wearing a dress and makeup, despite the fact that no one asked nor is apparently interested, giving the impression that something happened and he would like it to be eked out of him.
In an enlightened effort to appeal to both men and women the part of Joe Walker will be recast as Josephine Walker, played as a siren of a different sort by Kathleen Turner. Beautiful, mature yet still in the unrealistic tight and revealing uniforms required by the (largely) male audience she frequently gets into scrapes with visiting guest stars with her inappropriate-sounding but (usually) thoroughly innocent comments.
Jimmy Frazerski will be played by Arnold Schwarzenegger as a grumpy and camp office clerk of East European descent, still living with his battleaxe mother (unseen, but voiced by Danny DeVito at his graveliest; apparently a large lady, she is one of Winckelstein’s favourites!) and his secret dreams of skipping across the set in a Busby Berkeley musical despite having two left feet and a lisp which makes his dialogue confusing to others – with hilarious consequences.
The part of Hodges the ARP warden will be recast as a reserve navy officer whose role is to make sure that coastal lights do not help U-Boats by shining out to sea, and is due to be played by Al Pacino who has asked that the character come from the Bronx and be an Italian-American. His catchphrase ‘Put that light out!‘ will now be more of a violent threat than the previous panicked squawk…
A new character will be introduced: Ensign ‘Yoyo’ Yates is eager to get involved in the war, his colleagues are eager to be rid of the annoyingly effervescent and enthusiastic, fast talking but militarily useless Yates, even his own large family (including his many sisters, a different one each week) want rid of him, but no one else wants this Eddie Murphy character! Every week he plots his escape and at the end of each episode he is waved off at the bus station, only to return at the beginning of the next with his latest hilarious tale of what caused his return.
Noted. Playing fair.
“Gotten through” – you are American?
Once again, no. Are you?;o)
No, you haven’t got through, like I seem not to have gotten through to you – but the word is still offensive, just the same.