Snaf
Are you retired or, does it rain a lot down your way?
??? I should be working…(shamefaced smilie would be here, but I am too lazy to go look for one)
And does it rain? It rains so much the cats have evolved webbed feet and snorkels.
Whats the matter – don’t you appreciate mildly amusing stories at the expense of other peoples dignity? I shall reserve the right to post mildly amusing or dull and offensive posts until I get bored. Or fired, whichever happens first.
You want more?
Woman gets slapped in the face by a whale
Whale exacts revenge on voyeurs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pqF2Lr8RkDk
If one thing is certain, it’s that animals exhibiting human traits are a recipe for YouTube success, as was the case with this video of a woman getting a slap from a whale, which has already attracted 1.6 million views and counting.
Whale watchers in Baja California, Mexico got closer to the magnificent mammals than they could have dreamed, with one swimming right next to their boat.
Tour guides can be heard warning tourists to be careful of the creature’s tail in the video, as it thrashes around in the water.
The whale then lifts a fin up high and brings it crashing down on one woman, effectively serving to slap her in the face.
Thankfully there is a slow mo of the incident afterwards, reminiscent of Jackass’s infamous fish to the face stunt.
“We went whale watching on the Baja this weekend and unfortunately, Chelsea got smacked in the head by a whale’s tail,” the uploader wrote on YouTube.
“Luckily, she was fine and we got it on video!”
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/weird-news/woman-gets-slapped-in-the-face-by-a-whale-9157421.html
This one was caught on video and, whats more, it was not a ex fish!
Wow snafu you are being dense.
Gee, and I was unaware that there was any examination taking place. Thank you, just the same. Hope the comedy made you laugh…
Can I guess that you also cannot narrow down which events 19kilo10 was referring to either? Was it the winter Olympics, which Putin obviously waited until it was over before starting his expansion policy? The Russian men’s ice hockey team failing to get a medal? Maybe it was how many people in Ukraine didn’t back their own premiers vision? Possibly it was the protests which both sides claim the other started, with protesters being shot dead and troops & police failing to suppress the discontent? Could it be how the Ukrainian premier ran off like a thief in the night when his own military eventually flopped and let in the protesters?
‘Mr Potent’??? Colour me confused. If you are referring to Putin it might be best for you to keep it simple and, you know, actually use a name that people actually recognise. And if you were referring to Putin then he has nothing to fear from yourself either; remember that this is just a thread on a forum – maybe your computer is sitting in a pile of sand, allowing you to make silly head-in-the-sand quips, but mine isn’t.
No, I’m not laughing.
Not all news makes the reporters work – that coming in from Ukraine won’t fill the entire paper itself, you know…;o)
“Hank thought that the workshop had skimped on his service, but wasn’t sure he knew enough to challenge them…”
In my opinion there is no reason for the Us or Europe to get involved on what is basically Russia cleaning house.
Define ‘Russia cleaning house’, sorting out your error in grammar.
Do you not agree that Ukraine is/was an independent nation with another nations military bases on its land inside its borders – a bit like Cuba? If you believe that Russia has the right to march into another country – former Soviet Block or not – where (as others have asked) does that leave the Baltic states, for example?
But it is quite amusing to see you Europeans refusing to see reality as to what Putin is doing.
Oh, and what is the reality? Or, at least, the reality that you believe you see him doing?
What amuses me is that so much of what we understand in general depends on the bias of the news provider/s you listen to. Those countries without a generally liberal agenda are happy for their news providers to only present an angle that matches the leaderships view, or the owners are so scared of what might happen should a viewpoint contrary to theirs and the governments be presented to the masses that they become rabid predators, either consuming the weaker opposition or shouting down, making up complete lies and/or badmouthing those who even mildly disagree with them.
Did Fox News spring right to the front of your mind just then…;o)
Because of the Wendy’s lackluster response I see Russia being emboldened to act again. If Europe wants to bury there head in the sand and pretend the bear isn’t stirring then that’s just fine too.
Whoa! Wendy’s? Sorry – THE Wendy’s? Stirring bear? I think I get the bear, but you really need to explain The Wendy’s, or else I shall introduce the Winter Stoat or Oddfish into the conversation and carry on as though you fully understood what the hell I was on about. (Is hell a swear word to you as well? I told my US work colleagues that it is a town in Norway – which it is – and refused to contribute to the swear box. What about bitch? They used it like a term of endearment, but when I tried using it to my wife I was lucky to escape with my life!)
Anyway, if Russia is trying to become a reunified big red state, just like it used to be, then it is going to have to upset a lot of apple carts – the peasants have tasted democracy (of a fashion) and some have become really fat on it: you won’t take that away from them easily. Plus there is a generation that never knew what it was like to live under the gaze of the KGB and all that that entailed.
Putin is just flexing his muscles (those which caught the eye of several news channels who never miss an opportunity to show him topless) and doing what Brezhnev did with Afghanistan in 1978 – his man was in power, needed a little help with an internal difficulty and please could the might of Russia come and lend a hand. Give it a few years and it might be another Russian Vietnam…
Last month if anyone had stated that Russia would takeover Crimea the majority of you would have said it would never happen.
(Groan. Sigh. Mutter…) Just because you haven’t looked back to see how many others have put something similar before him; I know I did. And you know why that bandwagon started rolling? Because those in the know knew that nothing would happen before the winter Olympics were finished! Putin wouldn’t have wanted to do a damned thing (was that US swearing too?;o) before the men’s ice hockey medals were sorted.
And its no good agreeing with 19k10 about Obama without verifying your own political stance – is it because he is black, he is a black democrat, he is a democrat, or that he is a politician? I have to ask since I was working in the US when he achieved office (2008-2009) and most of those who were unhappy at him being made president were happy to admit to me that it was because of the colour of his skin – even democrats. I now cannot sit back and believe that it is just his policies (still right wing to my mind) that are what Americans are against based on my (admittedly small) sample. The British health service was one wonderful thing by a politician (I’m hard pushed to come up with another, not at this time of night), yet when a black democrat president tries to do something to help the poor and needy then the unpoor and not-needy are up in arms, even believing the lies spread about the British health service because it suits their purpose. Why not grow a pair, bubba, and remember that it is not just you in this mean old world?
I might close now because my young and wonderfully amused 18 month old daughter has just dumped the contents of a cup into my lap instead of falling asleep. And it is cold water! Sorry if non of the above makes sense – I haven’t finished editing yet!
Snaf,
I’m all for puncturing a bit of pomp !
Then take your pin off with you to The Last Night Of The Proms…
Will you listen to yourselves?
Maybe she isn’t in a place (mentally) where she feels it right to bring her late husbands child into the world yet.
The trauma of losing a partner is bad enough, without having to make decisions about whether to use or lose his sperm when you are not ready.
Glad I don’t have your nerve in my tooth condescending p*+€^. You can hold your breath and stamp your little feet all you want child but you know I’m right and you have made an argument whatsoever.
What, exactly, do you mean by “Glad I don’t have your nerve in my tooth condescending p*+€^.“? I think your auto correction function might be playing up again…;o)
And what is it you right about?
Dont bring me into this. I actually side with Russia here for the simple fact that Russian porn is VASTLY superior to Ukrainian!
Well, you can try using that as a bargaining chip but I don’t really believe it will work…
Um, in what way is it superior, and how can you tell where your porn is from? Hawky will be upset that you have dragged this thread down to that sort of level.
Actually, Snafu, I think he is right
No, no no. That’s not a phrase we use around here.
and the news providers point of view is irrelevant. We can all see what is happening on the ground and we don’t need a news provider to supply a back story.
So where will you get the story from, if not from a news provider?
We can see what ‘they’ want us to see. We hear what they want us to hear. Nothing more.
Did you hear about the Russia Today presenters?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26468837
Russia Today is a little like what Radio Moscow used to be – a state run media service pushing the states views and news and ignoring anything that the state decided needed to be ignored. These ladies were based in the US and had one or two things to say about the flags they were supposed to wave…
As I’ve said before let the East and South go East, where they belong and let the West go West where it belongs. History tells us it makes sense.
I thought you were talking about the trains!
How does it make sense? Which East and South? What particular part of history?
I’m sorry I started this. Nobody can be civil here so I’m out.
Lightweight. How will we learn about your views on porn now?
I’m embarrassed to say that the bad guys in this situation are the EU and the USA, and I blame EU expansionism for the current mess.
Why? I don’t believe the EU threatened to storm the barricades unless Ukraine joined, and the EU’s expansionism is grossly different from – say – Hitler, or Saddam. In some ways its more like a loyalty card than violent blackmail, with the choice being join us or we kill your first born, mwah ha ha ha.
About 16 years too late. She was gone by the end of 1999…
What she said (if she is a she; if not I apologise)^^^
But no matter that the sexes might think differently it is still something that would have an affect on anybody.
So I am seriously disappointed that the idea that it shouldn’t mean anything to her is so prevalent. (Look it up)
The dreaded social media, Snafu – there you can see what’s going on. And read your history and you’ll understand my comment.
And…? I mean, despite their political bias, at least a news provider has history and some form of legal obligation behind it – even if it just means that Piers Morgan is no longer editor of the Daily Mirror.
Yes, there will be some vids out there which are genuine and news worthy BUT there will be quite a few easily made fakes because, unlike in the movies, it is so damned difficult to get footage that tells the story. The true story. The story that is happening in several places at once and needs a narrative because otherwise it is just a bunch of people either dancing or protesting (and there are quite a few clubs in Ibiza where you can get the same effect even without the assistance of dodgy pills).
And nobody really investigates those stories that appear on Youtube and so on. Why? Because it can be difficult tracking down the camera man, pinning down the facts and finding witnesses who can verify the events.
How many doubted that video of the marines shooting that wounded Afghan dead, claimed it was fake before claiming that ‘if’ it was real then he deserved it anyway?
I suppose social media can be a great thing (I don’t use it, since I waste too much time on computers anyway) but it is not the greatest thing. Traditional journos get trained to question and investigate whilst the new accountants – sorry, I mean media executives – just want to cut the penny’s and enjoy getting something for nothing.
Charlie, which history? Point me in the right direction since obviously what you know and understand and what I know and understand is just telling me you are wrong…;o)
Seriously, what do you think it means?