dark light

snafu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 3,597 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #264189
    snafu
    Participant

    Mentioned this a while ago, when someone else was AWOL. Nothing then either.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264193
    snafu
    Participant

    No.

    They are inconveniencing the public. That is all he cares about. Their new contract might demand that they have ground up glass inside their shoes all day, every day, but his interest was lost the moment someone tried to complain.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264229
    snafu
    Participant

    …unless they compact the usable site and CGI it? ;o)

    in reply to: General Discussion #264233
    snafu
    Participant

    Not exactly. Guessing is what you do when wondering if North Korea could actually do what their propaganda insists they will do. Worst case scenario is that, yes, mutually assured destruction is possible as demonstrated by the field demonstration.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264259
    snafu
    Participant

    If North Korea had their way, under the circumstances, there would be nobody to pay either.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264264
    snafu
    Participant

    An iconic photographer…

    In Washington D.C., the capital of America, in the summer 1967, Jan Rose Kasmir, a Vietnam War protester, stood infront of a row of National Guard servicemen outside the Pentagon. The soldiers would not have looked out of place on the frontlines of a world war – hardhats on, their rifles lowered, bayonets fixed.

    Kasmir, in a flowing tye dye dress which is such a part of the 60s hippy movement, was smiling, holding a flower out towards them. It became one of the most seen photographs of the twentieth century.

    The creator of the image, a French photographer called Marc Riboud, died on August 30, 2016, just over 49 years, to the day, since that picture of Jan Rose Kasmir was taken.

    Riboud passed away after a long struggle with Alzheimer’s disease, at the age of 93.

    http://www.bjp-online.com/2016/09/remembering-marc-riboud-who-has-died-at-age-93/

    I can remember being part of a team compiling what was essentially a top ten within various genres in the run up to the new millennium, and having to fight to have this image included as part of either the protest section or the 1960s; there were other excellent images with which it was in competition, but it was a powerful shot which helped to explain the time and the situation well. Riboud said of the photo, “She was just talking, trying to catch the eye of the soldiers, maybe trying to have a dialogue with them. I had the feeling the soldiers were more afraid of her than she was of the bayonets.” Smithsonian Magazine later called it “a gauzy juxtaposition of armed force and flower child innocence.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]247925[/ATTACH]

    Also… A boy whose girlfriend was a little too passionate.

    A 17 year old boy from Itzdapalapa, Mexico, has died in a shock incident after his 24 year old girlfriend gave him an overly passionate love bite.

    Julio Macias Gonzalez started to fit at the dinner table when he was eating with his family. An ambulance was called but unfortunately the boy died at the scene.

    Doctors noticed a small bruise on his neck and discovered that he’d been with his girlfriend earlier in the day. They believe that his girlfriend’s passionate neck sucking had put trauma on one of his arteries causing a blood clot which then travelled up to his brain and caused a stroke.

    It’s thought that the girlfriend has gone into hiding after the incident and reportedly the boy’s parents never approved of the relationship because of the age gap. They are now blaming her for the incident.

    This isn’t the first time someone has suffered a serious injury as a result of a love bite. In 2011 a 44-year-old woman from Auckland, New Zealand, lost the use of an arm after a similar incident.

    Dr Teddy Wu, who treated her, said: “To my knowledge, it’s the first time someone has been hospitalised by a hickey.”

    http://lifestyle.one/closer/news-real-life/in-the-news/17-year-old-died-love-bite/

    in reply to: General Discussion #264294
    snafu
    Participant

    Kids grow up believing that the human body will perform all sorts of fantastical gymnastics moves when hit by a bullet because they’ve seen it at the movies, when the opposite is true. And that cars burst into flames and explode after accidents or if hit by bullets, or that a guard can be knocked out with one ‘tap’ on the back of the head.

    The shattering of the human body by gunfire and explosions as seen in the beach landing scenes in Saving Private Ryan – that is more real than 99% of the rest of the war/action films; life is bad enough, but war is ugly and it is rare that the bodies are left as ‘pretty’ as you are used to seeing in ‘standard’ film fayre. As a photographer in a war Jarecke saw what soldiers see, smell what soldiers smell, hear what soldiers hear and tell their audience.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264296
    snafu
    Participant

    Maybe they will film it elsewhere, in CGI.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264299
    snafu
    Participant

    Yes it is.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264392
    snafu
    Participant

    Trumpy talks to Mexican president, comes away and declares that Mexico will build his wall. And pay for it.

    El presidente says they had a cordial meeting that never discussed the wall in detail, just a passing mention where, he stated, “I made it clear that Mexico will not pay for the wall”. The Hillary Clinton campaign said “he got beat in the room and lied about it”.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264395
    snafu
    Participant

    Who do they ask? Has anyone here ever been asked to take part in a poll?

    I took part in a Pepsi challenge many years ago, but that was more to get two little cups of cola than anything serious.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264399
    snafu
    Participant

    Further.

    Ken Jarecke was a photographer during the first Gulf War (1991) who took a photograph – the photograph – of the burned body of an Iraqi soldier in the cab of a truck on the ‘Highway of Death’, the road from Kuwait City to Basra which was used for the mass retreat, and became a turkey shoot.
    He justified taking the image by telling an accompanying soldier ”If I don’t photograph this, people like my mom will think war is what they see on TV”.
    The picture was not used by newspapers in America but was on the front page of The Observer.

    “In the UK it was published by the London Observer and I was actually going through Heathrow and I picked up the newspapers and I saw it was quite big, and that was basically the scene I thought I was going to see in all the newspapers around the world, since everybody had access to the image. It caused quite a controversy in London, which is what images like that are meant to do. They’re meant to basically cause a debate in the public: “Is this something we want to be involved in?”

    How can you decide to have a war if you are not fully informed? You need to know what the end result will be, what the middle result will be.”

    [RIGHT]Kenneth Jarecke[/RIGHT]

    If Hersey had not been able to describe what had happened at Hiroshima then maybe the military could have used the bomb in Korea, with the chance that the Russians replying in kind, and then what…?

    in reply to: General Discussion #264401
    snafu
    Participant

    It might be because, what with the planet still being bombarded with asteroids at that time, there could be a chance that life came in from off planet.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264404
    snafu
    Participant

    Thank you for your concern.

    Unfortunately, despite what you seem to believe, I am not ACDC so your therapy will be wasted. But I thank the entire forum for their interest. Well, most of them anyway.

    in reply to: General Discussion #264407
    snafu
    Participant

    Although the Japanese were not greatly valued as allies in WWI, and as the ‘Yellow Peril’ were demonised – especially in US newspapers and cartoons – for at least a decade before Pearl Harbour.

    But the American public had no idea what this new weapon could do; the British reports did go into detail, but newspaper was rationed at the time so no British publication could go into the kind of detail the the story in The New Yorker did exclusively. Maybe this knowledge made the world safer – with the public now aware of what the atom bomb could do the threat of using it made mutually assured destruction (eventually) a reason to avoid using it. The stories of those six survivors, they things they saw and experienced, made them human in the eyes of their former enemies; yes, the things done by the Japanese military in the name of their emperor were savage and barbaric, yet since then they have (until recently) not deployed their armed forces into war zones but maintained a defence force by law – they are not the people they once were.
    The people who suffered at the hands of the Japanese military are growing fewer by the day and, anyway, their rage is understandable since the way the Japanese ruled over those they conquered was (by today’s standards) beyond evil; the Japanese people today are very much different, and maybe the story that was broken 70 years ago today, by John Hersey, helped the worldview of that country’s people and the mindset of those who would come to rule them to change?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 3,597 total)