dark light

Wyvernfan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,891 through 4,905 (of 5,170 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Royal Navy.. the Weird, the Wacky, and the Wonderful. #1231660
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Fantastic.. thanks Jetflap. I wonder what was behind the different colour scheme on the aircraft nearest the camera.

    BSG-75.
    Yes there is one that is apparently still under restoration to fly, although judgeing by recent photos it is either painfully slow or has ground to a halt.
    And thanks for mentioning the A2D Skyshark.. my second favourite after the Cutlass.

    Mike Currill.
    I agree the Skyray is a fine looking plane.. but it looks ‘somewhat normal’. The Cutlass has a touch of “what the hell is that” about it.. and i like that.!

    in reply to: Royal Navy.. the Weird, the Wacky, and the Wonderful. #1231909
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Interesting selection though Wyvernfan – I bet at the time our American cousins were enjoying seeing what the FAA had while they had Skyraiders, Panthers, Cougars etc !

    Maybe so… but in return they did give us my favourite among US Naval aircraft, the Vought F7U Cutlass (or gutlass).:)

    in reply to: Sad fate of the TU 144s. #563167
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Like here 😀
    http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m50/judasPFS/Shinsheim-158-1.jpg

    What a great couple of days that was….

    Yes exactly… but a shame its in Germany and not over here.. oh well. :rolleyes:

    I must say that every time i see the TU-144 on video i am in awe of its sheer presence and majesty.. and the close up clip of it taxiing at Paris with the pilot waving out of the window just shows what an awkward but somehow beautiful aeroplane it really was.;)

    in reply to: Royal Navy.. the Weird, the Wacky, and the Wonderful. #1232060
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Great photo jetprov.. i hav’nt seen many of the Seamew in flight before so if you have any more then please do post them, together with any other naval types that you might have..;)

    in reply to: Sad fate of the TU 144s. #563603
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    I agree with Bemused. A poorly designed, very complex, dangerous airplane best left on the ground.

    Maybe so.. but would love to have seen one come to Britain and be preserved next to an example of Concorde..!:cool:

    in reply to: Operation Bolero 3 a no go… #1232710
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    its gonna be an amazing sight of 3 p51s in tight formation. i’m sure we are in for a treat whatever they may be.

    Not for me.. personally i hate seeing any historic aircraft in tight formation. Don’t see the reason behind it other than the pilots showing off there flying skills.
    Don’t get me wrong.. love seeing all historic aircraft flying… especially at Dx, but that Mustang duo at every legends just makes me wince.!:(

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon air racer.? #1233030
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Another ‘unusual’ racer from the same year as the Sturgeon.. Blackburn Firebrand TF5.A EK621 “81” at the Elmdon races 1949.

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon air racer.? #1235705
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    I take it that with so many relatively low powered types being classed as the winner, the handicap given to them against bigger more powerful types was somewhat over generous to say the least..

    in reply to: Exeter CAACU Meteors and Mossies #1236113
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Mosquitos..

    Probably not what your looking for, but interesting naval variants..

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1236819
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    She bobbed around a bit before sinking – not surprising considering she had been stripped of engines and all other heavy objects.

    Including the pilot i hope..;)

    in reply to: Preservation – learning from the past #1236853
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    The Indianapolis (Allison) Branch had assisted in shipping to Derby an old prototype engine (think it is the XT40-A-1 turboprop with supersonic propeller) which present-day engineers are studying as part of the R-R Open Rotor project..

    Was it two of these that powered the Douglas A2D Skyshark naval attack plane.? If it was then that was some engine.. for although it suffered more than its fair share of reliability problems like its british counterpart the AS Python.. it powered the Skyshark on to over 500 mph.
    Made the Wyvern seem painfully slow by comparison.!

    in reply to: Duxford today.. #1236859
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Not quite sure what the occasion is but from my window with my binoculars i can see a couple of Yak 52’s, a Fiat G-46, AN-2, and what looks like a red and white Chipmunk visiting today.. among some other light aircraft.
    Any ideas.?

    in reply to: Sea Vixen G-CVIX – What's the latest? #1237123
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Lt Cdr Matt Whitfield RN – a serving Fleet Air Arm pilot who flies the Hawks at RNAS Yeovilton and is also one of the RNHF’s Sea Hawk pilots.

    Thanks stringbag.. sounds like the old girl will be in safe hands..!;)

    Rob.

    in reply to: Sea Vixen G-CVIX – What's the latest? #1237269
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    XP924 flew a successful shake-down sortie today at Hurn. This was Brian Grant’s final flight as pilot of the Sea Vixen. 😀

    Thats a shame Brian is retireing, have really enjoyed some of his displays so many thanks to him and all the best.
    Incidentally who will be flying Foxy lady in the future.?

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1160525
    Wyvernfan
    Participant

    Well.. after reading all of that i’m not sure i dare pop my head above the trench for fear of being shot.. but for what its worth here’s MY opinion.

    Duxford, Yeovilton and Cosford all work and ‘do it’ for enthusiasts and joe public alike. I am a firm believer that aviation, whether alive or dead, belongs on an airfield. And if it is also a working airfield (even GA or gliding) then even better, as seeing aviation in a working form is believe it or not very appealing to virtually everyone.. especially children.
    There are of course some exceptions, such as the Gatwick museum and DH centre, but even some of these are ‘runners’ and do sometimes come alive.
    Now i know that everything at Hendon does’nt work, but if the superb collection that they have was better displayed in hangers on an actual airfield rather than a sorry site of a former one, being rapidly overtaken by the transformation of its surroundings, then quite possibly it may make it more appealing to a bigger audience… and more importantly a paying audience.!

    The UK is blessed with so much heritage both aviation and general, and so many former airfields go to waste because there is no longer a use for them, West Raynham being a prime candidate of a superbly preserved airfield about to dissapear. So why not bite the bullet and move the collection to a more suitable venue.. an airfield with plenty of cover, plenty of room, and plenty of atmosphere.. rather than fighting surrounding development and a very restrictive amount of space.

    Ok.. i know there are going to be many who say ‘no, it must stay in Hendon’, but sometimes a brave and radical change is needed. As the saying goes, if it ain’t broke don’t fix it, but if it is broke then fix it.. PROPERLY.

    This is just my opinion.. so please no personal remarks. Thanks.;)

Viewing 15 posts - 4,891 through 4,905 (of 5,170 total)