What a BS! Fired because of having an a little f**** now and then. “Conduct not becoming a CEO” or what? BS.
Apparently for most US corporations running a business into financial ruin is consider “conduct becoming a CEO” so those folks stay around forever. A concentual act done away from work seems to be more than a few can handle.
What a BS! Fired because of having an a little f**** now and then. “Conduct not becoming a CEO” or what? BS.
Apparently for most US corporations running a business into financial ruin is consider “conduct becoming a CEO” so those folks stay around forever. A concentual act done away from work seems to be more than a few can handle.
During our first sim session I made the offer for the CLE intern (who also happens to be a student from my alma mater) to sit in on our training. After he patiently watched 4 hours of my training partner and myself fly the virtual sky I jumped out and we threw him in the left seat and gave him some stick time. He was probably left with no more than 10-15 minutes of sim time before we had to jump out but he was thrilled. Thanks to good planning he had brought a video camera so now he has his experience on video (thanks to my excellent camera work). Watching him fly I honestly I thought he landing was better than any that I had that evening. 😉
Unfortunately, in the training world there is little, if no time to truly explore flying the simulator (ie have fun). Back in the late ’90’s United use to check their interns out in their sims, meaning that they were authorized to operate the simulators without supervision. A few of those folks had over 100 hours in the simulators when they were done with their internship. Thanks to friends out on internships I’ve had the opportunity to fly the UAL 727, 737 Classic sims as well as a NWA 757 sim.
I don’t know if they still offer it but UAL use to sell a simulator package for about $500+ that gave anyone the opporunity to fly one of their sims for 1 hour. You got a small ground school on the aircraft you were going to fly and then they threw you in the sim with an instructor and let you fly it around. I haven’t seen it advertized since before 9/11 so it may be over.
During our first sim session I made the offer for the CLE intern (who also happens to be a student from my alma mater) to sit in on our training. After he patiently watched 4 hours of my training partner and myself fly the virtual sky I jumped out and we threw him in the left seat and gave him some stick time. He was probably left with no more than 10-15 minutes of sim time before we had to jump out but he was thrilled. Thanks to good planning he had brought a video camera so now he has his experience on video (thanks to my excellent camera work). Watching him fly I honestly I thought he landing was better than any that I had that evening. 😉
Unfortunately, in the training world there is little, if no time to truly explore flying the simulator (ie have fun). Back in the late ’90’s United use to check their interns out in their sims, meaning that they were authorized to operate the simulators without supervision. A few of those folks had over 100 hours in the simulators when they were done with their internship. Thanks to friends out on internships I’ve had the opportunity to fly the UAL 727, 737 Classic sims as well as a NWA 757 sim.
I don’t know if they still offer it but UAL use to sell a simulator package for about $500+ that gave anyone the opporunity to fly one of their sims for 1 hour. You got a small ground school on the aircraft you were going to fly and then they threw you in the sim with an instructor and let you fly it around. I haven’t seen it advertized since before 9/11 so it may be over.
Ah, Pay For Training captures a few more casualties. Sorry for their luck.
Here’s my only picture of a JetsGo MD-80 taken at EWR. The NYC skyline is off to the left of the nose.
Ah, Pay For Training captures a few more casualties. Sorry for their luck.
Here’s my only picture of a JetsGo MD-80 taken at EWR. The NYC skyline is off to the left of the nose.
A friend in the training department took a bunch of pictures of my training partner and myself flying the sim but I haven’t been able to get them burned on a disc. There are a few of us flying inverted over NYC. 😀
A friend in the training department took a bunch of pictures of my training partner and myself flying the sim but I haven’t been able to get them burned on a disc. There are a few of us flying inverted over NYC. 😀
I know I didn’t get my ATPL in a cornflakes packet!!!!!
That sure would have been a lot easier.
You mean you didn’t go to the Kelloggs school of aviation??
Actually the school at the W.K. Kellogg Airport is called Western Michigan University.
http://www.wmich.edu/aviation/
Until 9/11 they did the initial training for British Airways newhires there.
http://www.airnav.com/airport/KBTL
I’ve been to KBTL so I can say honestly say that I’ve been to the Kelloggs school of aviation but unfortunately they didn’t issue free ATPL’s.
My view
Now Im just a mere PPL with 90 odd hrs who is just starting his ATPLs towards his fATPL
Id say that most, if not all GA pilots have not experienced a large amount of time on a flight deck of an airliner, but all commercial pilots have experienced time in a GA aircraft. (exclusive of the ex airline pilots now instructing etc)
Id say that most GA pilots have not gone through the process of obtaining a type rating and flying a GA aircraft which weighs in the ‘tonne’ catagory, but all commercial pilots have experienced time in a GA aircraft. (exclusive of the ex airline pilots now instructing etc)
Id say that most GA pilots have not undertaken the ground exams for the ATPL/CPL/IR/MER/JOT/MCC/TR/ etc but nearly all commercial pilots have undertaken these.
Id say that most GA pilots have not accrued thousands of flight hrs in their log book (exclusive of the ex airline pilots now instructing etc) but most/if not all commercial pilots have (new ATPLs obviously have not)Now the list goes on, so in general the commercial pilot has more experience than the ‘average’ GA pilot and that has to be a fact (rememeber there are always exceptions to every rule)
Dean, thanks for putting it so nicely. That’s what I’ve been trying to put across.
Ps. Where on earth did you get that swanky cockpit from? Its looks like a Cessna Skylane I think (?). Dunno when that became an average GA aircraft, wish I could afford one! Would have certainly helped my qualifying cross country, but then I was just dreaming of having a transponder!
It’s the new Skylane. Actually the previous version of both the C172 and C182 were better equiped than most larger aircraft as well. When I took my last flight in a Cessna (1999 model) before leaving for the airlines I had a GPS with a moving map and an autopilot. It was more than 2 years later before I flew anything that nice at work.
So judge a pilot by his equipment rather than where he’s been or what he’s done? The best pilot I’ve ever flown with I’d never seen in other than a C-152 even though his experience was drawn from aircraft well beyond anyone’s experience at the airport. He’d been a professional pilot for about 50 years and I can only hope to become 1/10th the pilot he is.
Whiskey Delta.
Interesting stats, but pretty meaningless surely in terms of a measure of pilot skills when nothing is factored in to take account of the fact that virtually all commercial flights are two-man crew?
A mistake that will kill a lone pilot will often be identified by his Captain or First Officer. That’s why we have two crew operation.
(Not arguing against your stance, merely your misuse of statistics 🙂 )
Moggy
We have 2 pilots due to the workload requirements of the aircraft and the environment in which it is operated. By your implication accident rates would be less with 3 or 4 crew members than with 2. Since the 1960’s the accident rate has actually dropped even though the number of crewmembers has decreased as well.
Ok My turn,
WD and Martin,
You both seem to forget on thing you guys are flying basically over size sims your whole flight deck is on big flight Sim. While most GA aircraft still have 60 tech. in it.
So you’re saying that the quality of the pilot is proportioned to the age of his equipment? That’s BS. Did I learn more or have more valuable experiences flying a 1956 AeroCommander vs. a 1979 Seminole? Heck no.
You also seem under the impression that the difficulty of the job is lowered by the increase of glass tubes in the cockpit. How is tracking a VOR needle (which as been done for 50 odd years) different that tracking a GPS course line (which as only been done for the last 7 years or so)?
It’s all the same skills with different applications.
There are quite a few airliners flying with less equipment that your standard Cessna 172.

But I will say this most GA pilots i’ve found are better Navigators then you Airline guys why because we still have to do allot of Dead Reckon and flying the Compass, you have that nice big GPS that tells you when to turn and why we are on that hell you have Rubert who does most of your flying for you.
I’m just curious what personal comparisons you’ve been able to make between the 2 groups.
Again, contrary to what you may think the average GA aircraft has more avionics capabilties than your average airliner.

I can tell you the easiest way to get a groan from a flight crew is to tell them “I’m a GA pilot so I know all about this” as you poke your head up front. :rolleyes: I seem to hear this about once a month. The fundementals may be the same but it’s like comparing Apples and Oranges.
On an average a professional pilot, thanks to his initial and recurrent training, is more proficient in his duties than the average GA pilot.
It’s not a personal attribute that permits this, professional pilots are products of their training and experiences. More of both lowers the accident rate significantly when compared to the GA community.
As for commercial pilots having, superior knowledge/skills/experiences this is again a sweeping generalisation in my view.
Yes, that is your view.
I don’t think you understand the amount of work that goes into being a professional pilot vs. remaining current as a GA pilot. Off the top of my head I can think of 2 written tests, 3 full days of ground school (that also include testing), 1 oral exam and 1 flight simulator flight test covering just about every emergency out there each year. Captains have to double up on most of those training events. Those are also jeopardy events, if the pilot fails they dequalify on their flying status. Within the commercial environment it’s constant learning and testing. Basically think of taking your PPL/CPL training every 6 or 12 months. That is where a commerical pilots knowledge advantage comes from.
I also believe that commerical pilot skills are sharper not only because of how often they apply their skills but also because they see quite a bit of training each year.
Experience comes from time spent behind the yoke and commercial pilots log (on average) many times the amount of flight time your typica GA pilot. Sure a GA pilot who practices aerobatics for 100’s of hours a year is going to be an outstanding aerobatic pilot. Similarly, a Commercial pilot who logs 100’s of hours a year is going to be a heck of lot more proficient and have a lot more experiences than a GA pilot who straps in to his PA-28 for about 50 hours a year.
When comparing to groups, no matter what they are, someone is going to come out on top. Professional pilots have a lot higher training behind their certificates, that’s just the nature of the beast.
Perhaps in the UK or other parts of Europe there are “0” time GA pilots flying Commercially as they didn’t need to go that route, that’s beyond my experience. Here in the US the average new airline pilot has 1000-2000 hours of GA experience before setting foot in even the smallest airline aircraft out there. Most of that time comes from instruting others to fly. Personally I have numerous ex-students still flying GA after all these years. Between them and friends I’ve made at our local GA airport I’m still involved in the community. I’ve spent time on both sides of the fence (and still do). What’s so hard to believe that even an airline pilot is still a GA pilot to a certain extent.