dark light

WB556

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 321 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vulcan Suffers Engine Damage #1014772
    WB556
    Participant

    Let’s hope they both ingested crap from the runway or geese or something, independently but simultaneously. I would guess that any significant airframe damage would be game over. You would think one of the engines would have been dropped today, if no good news surfaces tomorrow I’ll start to get worried. I have thrown a fair chunk of money at this aircraft over the years as have many and I would think they would be scrambling to alleviate people’s worries ASAP if there’s nothing to be worried about.

    in reply to: Vulcan Suffers Engine Damage #1015462
    WB556
    Participant

    Debris could just as easily be parts of the engine core chewed up and thrown through the back along with the remains of any FOD that may have been ingested.

    in reply to: Any airworthy Typhoons in existence ? #1017243
    WB556
    Participant

    The design authority for the Sabre would be Rolls Royce as they purchased English Electric which had previously purchased Napier and Sons aero division. Napier turbochargers still exists but I doubt they would have accepted or wanted anything related to any of the old engine designs.

    in reply to: Any airworthy Typhoons in existence ? #1017582
    WB556
    Participant

    Could you not just reengineer the sleeve valve from scratch applying a modern solution but retaining the engine core layout or use a simple system like the Burt-McCollum sleeve valve?

    in reply to: Anyone for a static Mig 23? #1018211
    WB556
    Participant

    Seems OK for £2550.

    in reply to: Anyone for a static Mig 23? #1027302
    WB556
    Participant

    Seems OK for £2550.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1019345
    WB556
    Participant

    Guess it all just depends on priorities. Transports not free so maybe it’s not worth the outlay.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1028344
    WB556
    Participant

    Guess it all just depends on priorities. Transports not free so maybe it’s not worth the outlay.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1019495
    WB556
    Participant

    Actually the real reason for the disposal is simple and shows a great deal of thought and consideration. The museum made the decision that they had reached the maximum number of airframes that they could afford to look after and maintain indoors. They considered finances along with staff and volunteer workloads. When they were subsequently offered new airframes (Harrier GR.9 being one) they knew they would have to pass others on.

    Any disposals were offered free to other museums first, what more could they have done. They have finite resources and are taking a responsible view as to the number of airframes they can keep in good condition.

    The VC-10 isn’t going anywhere btw, it has never been the case of wanting an RAF example purely that concern was raised about the state of the undercarriage. A survey has been carried out and determined that she is in better condition than she looks.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1028535
    WB556
    Participant

    Actually the real reason for the disposal is simple and shows a great deal of thought and consideration. The museum made the decision that they had reached the maximum number of airframes that they could afford to look after and maintain indoors. They considered finances along with staff and volunteer workloads. When they were subsequently offered new airframes (Harrier GR.9 being one) they knew they would have to pass others on.

    Any disposals were offered free to other museums first, what more could they have done. They have finite resources and are taking a responsible view as to the number of airframes they can keep in good condition.

    The VC-10 isn’t going anywhere btw, it has never been the case of wanting an RAF example purely that concern was raised about the state of the undercarriage. A survey has been carried out and determined that she is in better condition than she looks.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1019639
    WB556
    Participant

    De Havilland Sea Vampire T22, De Havilland Sea Venom, Vickers Varsity, Amiot AAC.1 Toucan and Morane Saulnier MS.502 Criquet.

    Geeze, some people get their knickers in a heck of a twist. A simple phone call to IWM and you can have a copy of the list all of your own!

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1028725
    WB556
    Participant

    De Havilland Sea Vampire T22, De Havilland Sea Venom, Vickers Varsity, Amiot AAC.1 Toucan and Morane Saulnier MS.502 Criquet.

    Geeze, some people get their knickers in a heck of a twist. A simple phone call to IWM and you can have a copy of the list all of your own!

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1019649
    WB556
    Participant

    The varsity will go wherever whoever wins the bid decides to take her.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1028741
    WB556
    Participant

    The varsity will go wherever whoever wins the bid decides to take her.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1019652
    WB556
    Participant

    I have the list of items going to sealed bid 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 321 total)