dark light

mjr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gatwick Aviation Museum today. #1326530
    mjr
    Participant

    Hello all,

    Plazz hit the nail on the head, the bucc nose has been paint striped to be re painted in the summer, re the bucc nose not being straight? I think its just the lack of paint and and optical illusion, the nose is as straight as a straight thing. 😀 The jag will never get any attention what so ever 😮 , that much is certain, its a lost cause, and theres no point since a good jag is in storage just around the corner, and will arrive at some point. Most of the collection is looking pretty nasty after the winter period since all the aircraft are covered in winter preservative, wax oil and nasty moss, infact removing wax oil and washing started today, no sooner than we got all the kit out, it started raining 😡 grrrr.

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: Rare veiw of pre war Kenley Aerodrome. #1330725
    mjr
    Participant

    As far as I remember anyone’s allowed to wander round the runways and perimeter track but the buildings (those that are still there, not many) are fenced off.

    Actually, all the land inside of the perry track is MOD property, so you dont strictly have the right of way to this area, but its not as if the place is brimming with security, or anyone is going to stop you, the airfield is only used by 615 atc gliding (at least it was anyway). Not so long ago, local plod used to regularly patrol the airfield and boot off anyone inside of the perry track. The officer quarters are listed and fenced off because of yobs. they never used to be fenced off.

    MJR

    in reply to: Ghostboat #1331473
    mjr
    Participant

    I thought the first half was ok, started out quite well, all pointing towards some mysterious time shift, then the second half! what happened?! it was like the director decided he couldnt be ar@”ed to fininsh it, and just rushed the second half with some dodgy cop out. As for comparing it with Das Boot….. I dont think so, not even in the same league.

    The CGI wasnt bad for a low budget production, some of the cgi in pearl harbour was no better, bearing in mind that the budget was probably 10 times bigger, I thought the underwater shots were less convincing than the 109’s.

    mjr

    in reply to: Tom Cruise's P-51 #1333048
    mjr
    Participant

    actually, apparently hes not a half bad pilot, he was infected with the bug whilst filming top gun :p

    MJR

    in reply to: Gatwick Herald #1334476
    mjr
    Participant

    It is now on charge at the fire training ground. Unharmed and still in one piece.

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: The making of the Film Memphis Belle (old thread 2006) #1339691
    mjr
    Participant

    Ollie,

    your welcome, and by the way, theres nowt wrong with front page, its perfectly adequate for building a good site. keep plugging on, kudos to you for building a site.

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: The making of the Film Memphis Belle (old thread 2006) #1339767
    mjr
    Participant

    Ollie,

    I like your site, its coming along nicely, perhaps some wallpapers for each page will liven up it too?

    what package are you using to put the site together?, i.e frontpage? dreamweaver? or are you brave enough to write it in HTML!

    MJR

    in reply to: The making of the Film Memphis Belle (old thread 2006) #1339788
    mjr
    Participant

    ollie,

    good stuff.

    to alter compression and dpi.

    open a photo then

    in paint shop pro, go to FILE>PREFERENCES>FILE FORMAT PREFERENCES, from here you can alter the compression rates and DPI quality.

    ***REMEMBER THOUGH** that you are altering the OVERALL file format for the whole of Paint shop Pro for ALL images you open. Hence any image you open and subsequently close, will be prompted by a file change and save box. So any image you dont want to change, say NO to saving the changes.

    make a note of the values for the program before you change them.

    My advise is put all the piccies you want to reduce, in a seperate folder. Then change the settings in Paint shop pro. Then browse the folder you set up. once you have finished, set paint shop pro back to its default values.

    Appologies if Im teaching you to suck eggs by the way

    MJR

    in reply to: The making of the Film Memphis Belle (old thread 2006) #1339838
    mjr
    Participant

    ollie,

    you can reduce the average 1Mg image down to about 10-35k by
    1) saving as JPg’s and
    2) Reduce colour depth to 32,000. High definition is a waste of time for digital.

    3) increase the compression and decrease the Dpi until the picture suddenly drops to 16 colours and looks crap, then decrease the compression and increase the DPI 5% until the image looks right again, you will drastically reduce the file size by 90% whatever the orginal file size. Best package for doing this is paint shop pro, even the shareware version.

    If you want an ultra fast no hassle web site, that even works for dial up users! hosting images any bigger than 100k will turn people off of your site.

    give it a try, your site will nice and quick 🙂 .

    MJR

    in reply to: Vulcan 1st Flight #1340283
    mjr
    Participant

    Anyone seen a TV programme that aired this evening, regarding the VTS Campaign in some regions, not in mine.
    Seems they are planning to have her “Back to the Skies” sometime in August. 🙂 😀

    Any more news on this? Any more specific details….

    I thought November was the target? August seems a bit far fetched, as does November.

    MJR

    in reply to: The Forum Virtual Aviation Museum #1340503
    mjr
    Participant

    Beechcraft D.18s G-BKRN (Texantomcat)
    BAC Lightning 53-671/ZF579 (mjr)
    Blackburn Buccaneer S.2B XX889 (Buccsociety)
    Boeing B-17 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
    Boeing B-17 Radio room-reproduction (B-17man)
    Consolidated B-24 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
    de Havilland Hornet F.MK.1 Cockpit/Forward fuselage – reproduction (dcollins103)
    de Havilland Vampire FB.MK.5 Cockpit – VZ193 (dcollins103)
    de Havilland Vampire T. Mk 11 XD599 (Texantomcat)
    English Electric Canberra PR.9 Nose/cockpit XH175 (RossMcNeill)
    Handley Page Halifax B Mk III cockpit reproduction (HP57)
    Hawker Hurricane (Rocketeer)
    Hawker Hunter F1 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
    Hawker Hunter F2 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
    Hawker Hunter F6 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
    Hawker Hunter T7 XL591 (mjr)
    Hawker Typhoon Cockpit (Rocketeer)
    Miles Messenger M.2a G-AKIN (Rocketeer)
    North American AT-6-D-1-NT Texan G-TOMC (Texantomcat)
    Supermarine Spitfire Cockpit (Rocketeer)
    Supermarine Swift F7 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
    English Electric Canberra T4 WT486 nose/cockpit (sniperUK,2241sqn ATC)

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: The Forum Virtual Aviation Museum #1340833
    mjr
    Participant

    Beechcraft D.18s G-BKRN

    BAC Lightning 53-671/ZF579
    Blackburn Buccaneer S.2B XX889
    de Havilland Hornet F.MK.1 Cockpit/Forward fuselage – reproduction.
    de Havilland Vampire FB.MK.5 Cockpit – VZ193
    de Havilland Vampire T. Mk 11 XD599
    Hawker Hurricane
    Hawker Hunter F1 Nose/cockpit
    Hawker Hunter F2 Nose/cockpit
    Hawker Hunter F6 Nose/cockpit
    Hawker Hunter T7 XL591
    Hawker Typhoon Cockpit
    Miles Messenger M.2a G-AKIN
    North American AT-6-D-1-NT Texan G-TOMC
    Supermarine Spitfire Cockpit
    Supermarine Swift F7 Nose/cockpit

    My two pence worth 🙂

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: Removing paint from historic airframes #1341496
    mjr
    Participant

    dont use dasic!, too powerful, it will remove several layers at a time.

    MJR

    in reply to: Concorde rotting away #1342966
    mjr
    Participant

    Kev, I did not see your post till after I placed mine – but I think we’re both thinking along the same lines. Well said.

    I say good luck to all the groups and organisations willing to take on such a Titanic task. Just as much negativity and critisicm surrounded the Vulcan plans, and it looks as if they will prove all the doubters wrong. BASpeedbird001 and all the others, keep plugging on, such huge aspirations have to start somewhere, good luck with it, nothing is impossible. getting the Vulcan, Bucc and Vixen up are one thing, but you guys really have taken on the bohemoth!!

    MJR

    http://www.gatwick-aviation-museum.co.uk/lightning/mainsite.htm

    in reply to: Former Saudi Air Force Lightnings. #1390343
    mjr
    Participant

    whatever

    MJR

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 676 total)