Let me give it a shot. I can’t get 23m. Problem is the resolution is extremely poor. It is hard see the J-15 tail boom. So I excluded the tail-boom. Another thing, what is the J-15 length without the pitot tube? Pitot tube won’t be visible at all at this resolution.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]248681[/ATTACH]
Glad we are in agreement that the original “analysis” was poor because of the poor quality image, and especially biased and poor measuring.
fanboys like to take things at face value, especially when it favors their pre-determined biased views, like Foxmulder
Good job on the picture. Now we have TWO people confirming that the J-20 is as big as the Flanker.
I took your picture and flipped the J-20 to make an easier side by side comparison with the J-15.
It is 1 or 2 pixels LONGER. But I’m not going to nitpick.
it is more or less the same size as the 22 meter J-15. So most outlet’s claim of 23meter was not baseless
this is why you’re biased Deino. you are cherry picking images to fit your agenda. sure. ignore all the HD quality pictures comparing them from the side.
cherry pick the top down, grainy pixelated low quality picture of the flanker and j-20.
its this pic that you base your 20M from, but you follow it so faithfully
OH LOOK, blow it up in and zoom in
Look how much space in measurement he gave the Flanker.
Sure, the yellow line on the J-20 goes right to the edge of the engine, but look at that huge gap on the flankers tail (maybe about 3-4 pixels), and the gap by the radome.
Why don’t you put the j-20 side by side with the flanker. you will see its the same size
Sorry … if I’m over-sensitive, then You are over-ignorant and I’m not sure how relevant it is to search for the original F-22 image.
I’m afraid that over the years, you’ve become a fanboy with a strong bias towards Chinese aircraft. Maybe not to the extent of JSR, but maybe more along the lines of Nicolas10
It’s simply some sort of math …
Not sure what obscure link You just found to bake You claim, but most sources say it is about 20,30 (Wiki) or 20,35 m long. Just look at this image … otherwise You surely claim this J-15 is only a sub-scale model.
you try to argue against my HD image with a super pixelated one, where the edges are blurry and a one pixel difference is like a 1 meter difference?
sorry, many sites give 23 meter. just google j-20 and 23 meters.
Try to be non-bias and fair. I’m sorry not everyone thinks the J-20 is good looking besides you and other Chinese enthusiasts. In fact most of the rest of the world here, thinks it is probably the worst looking 5th gen aircraft behind the X-32.
Even a poster that was being shown in China but it closer to 22 meters.
yes, an actual information poster. yes in China
lots of other people came to the same conclusion
And of course side shots are great, where the smoothness of the plane gets to show itself off:
no, the sides are the worst. you can see how absurdly long it is. look at it compared to an f-22 juxtaposed with the j-20
Sign In
