dark light

Y-20 Bacon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,779 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    so it would seem that right now, the Gripen is superior in strike, being able to carry it farther with more integrated
    but that the Typhoon will seemingly have more planned to be integrated, can carry 1 ton more on more hard points, and will have Ashm capabilities

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178417
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Not in Russian service they don’t.

    No matter what intended role they have or had, they operate in separate attack units.

    Hopefully those Mi-24s are the new Mi-35 models as well. Deploying old choppers (as destructively awesome as the Mi-24P is) is just inexcusable at this point, attack helos have been the best branch of the VVS as far as new deliveries go.
    And their pilots fly very solid hours per year.

    check out this old thread
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?90144-Mi-28N-vs-Ka-52

    half the guys are like “but but.. the Ka-52 is for recon and night time only!!”

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178703
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Mi-28 has more then a slight armor advantage over 52. Like I said DIRCM is nice and all. But bigger threat in that mess will be good all fashion AA and your regular small arms wielding beardie.

    seems like everyone here is consensus that ka-52 has more advantages than disadvantages vs the mi-28

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2015 #2178706
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Poles have the most advanced version, the M-4K. It can carry quite a lot of early PGMs like Kh-29L/T, Kh-58+Vyuga-17 pod, etc. Integration of western munitions like Maverick seems highly unlikely..

    http://cms.kienthuc.net.vn/uploaded/lenam/2015_04_17/it-biet-su-22/dieu-it-biet-ve-may-bay-su-22-cua-viet-nam-hinh-4.jpg

    that new scheme is beautiful but im surprised poland kept the su-22 in the first place.
    i thought the plan was to use the f-16s for strike and the mig-29 for air superiority

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) – Take two #2178709
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Korea’s Fighter Jet Program Hits Turbulence As Washington Rejects Transfer of Core F-35 Technologies

    Excerpt:

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/release/167101/us-refuses-f_35-tech-transfer-to-korea.html

    My take: don’t trust the USA when it comes to buying arms. You can commit to a timely purchase of a US military product then discover too late to switch to another supplier that the US Congress doesn’t think you should get what you thought you’d agreed you were getting. Still, we are talking South Korea – which needs US military support – so the reality is that the USA can do more or less what it feels like doing with no come back.

    ok no problem, then they should go seek x-32 technologies.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) – Take two #2178713
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    You know HAL isn’t the only company in India right? :rolleyes:

    I take it you’ve never heard of the Tatas (TASL), because Lockheed Martin has. That’s how it discharged its offset obligations from the C-130J sale, an aircraft which it now proposes to build locally at the same facility if adequate orders come through. LM’s new acquisition i.e. Sikorsky tied up with TASL years ago and will build the S-70 locally when the IN order comes through.

    The Canadian F-35 order will never cross 65 units. Given that state-on-state fighting is apparently not a priority for them, even that figure remains to be seen. In contrast, if LM can get a foot into the Indian fighter market, follow on orders will easily take the tally into three digits over the next 15 years.

    you have a good point. my apologies to the native americans.

    in reply to: Indian Navy news thread #2020116
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Deliberate capability degradation of P-8I meant for India and why it matters-a classic case of ‘Strings Attached’

    how about the russians and french, are there strings attached to their stuff too when it comes to India

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2015) – Take two #2178825
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/canada-election-2015-trudeau-scrap-f35-halifax-1.3235791

    Canadian politicians threaten to scrap F-35

    I wish they would get on with it. We could offer there workshare to India.

    and do you really want the workshare to go to India? where they’ll likely demand that Lockheed cover the costs and expenses of any subpar manufactured product built by HAL?
    you best suck up to Canada, and deal with Justin Bieber and Drake

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178828
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    I do believe Ka-52s will eventually be deployed. Apaches were not deployed in Libya until several months after the air strikes started. Ka-52s have superb self defense suites and have much better survivability compared to Mi-24s.

    indeed. KA-52s are more superior to the Mi-28s because of those defensive suites..
    this is getting exciting to be honest..

    a real life multiplayer super smash brothers in Syria! lets go!

    in reply to: Could Russia surpass China for arms imports to Pakistan? #2178831
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    No! At least not in the near to mid term future, for the reasons that I’m sure have been discussed before on this forum on multiple occasions. Also, I don’t think this question merits a separate thread.

    yes it warrants a separate thread because its not only about the su-35 deal. Russia has already been selling things to Pakistan and now its expanding beyond defensive equipment. Pakistan wants Russian if the option is available.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2178834
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Funny … in this regard I would say it is still the same ! 😀

    you must forgive our dyslexic mystic mormon friend of ours, he has a habit of seeing mythical things
    like various hidden ducts in Pak-fa or its multi-faceted APU inlet. poor thing.
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?118951-Pak-Fa-news-thread-part-21&p=1970271#post1970271

    in reply to: Rockwell-MBB X-31 #2180999
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Isn’t this almost a spitting image of it ?

    http://defence-blog.com/news/iran-orders-from-china-150-j-10-fighter-jets.html

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]240569[/ATTACH]

    well the Chinese did get an extensive look at the Lavi
    http://i.imgur.com/B38vQiO.jpg

    then they made their own in the early 90s
    http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=92547&d=1388839694
    http://sh.uploads.ru/S5DMl.jpg

    but had to modify the design extensively because they could only get Russian engines.

    this just looks right
    http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i65/elite-falcon07/j-10/israleij10.jpg

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2181432
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/aI3zaux.png

    what if, the Canards were designed in a configuration similar to the Rafale (close coupled), how would the Typhoons performance change?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2181441
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    AESA radar closing in on flight trials:
    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/euroradar-nears-flight-test-phase-for-captor-e-on-ty-416564/

    where’s that bloke who claimed it would be in service by now lol.

    in reply to: Is the J-20 the least maneuverable 5th gen? #2181475
    Y-20 Bacon
    Participant

    Chinese aerospace may have taken 30 years to get to this point, but progress isn’t necessarily linear. Furthermore, we should probably consider the tools China has at its disposal now compared to 30 years ago. Computers are only getting more powerful and development and manufacturing technologies have only become more sophisticated. And even with all that considered, by the time the WS-15 is in production around 2020, if there are no hiccups, it will have been over 25 years since the F119 first flew, and it may not be as good as what the Russians will field with the Type 30 (6 stage HPC for 170-180 kN vs 5 stage HPC) or what the US may begin testing in a decade. I don’t find China having a 180 kN engine by 2020 *that* unreasonable all things considered. As with the J-20 itself, it doesn’t happen until it does, but China isn’t North Korea, and they’ve demonstrated both with engines and with a lot of other technologies that they can make very rapid progress, even if the process isn’t smooth sailing. If that is still difficult to believe though, considering the economic power at China’s disposal and the money they throw into military modernization, and I find it unlikely that if they can’t develop adequately powered engines for the J-20 on their own they wouldn’t just find a way to buy them from Russia. CAC has maintained a very close relationship with Salyut for a reason, I think.

    Of course, as the case with anything related to China’s military technology, it’s only fair that you take what I have to say with a grain of salt. Sorry if that was tl;dr (but now I have a post I can reference whenever the history of the WS-10 is discussed).

    me am agree.
    but also chinabots are also prone to “hey, our economy and technology is rising super fast, that must mean so are our jet engines, radar technology, society, donkey, xyz”.
    they dont realize that in some things take time to develop no matter how much money you throw at it.

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,779 total)