dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,981 through 1,995 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: revisiting the Turkish attack helicopter competition #2174585
    JSR
    Participant

    I would not expect some hypothetical 1-vs-1 comparison here, I think it was a purely strategic decision, an entry ticket to worldwide aerospace market for Turkey.

    Not only did TUSAS get a license for LHTEC CTS800, but more importantly TAI/ASELSAN got a chance to develop indigenous hardware (avionics, mission computers, weapons system, HMCS, self-protection suite). They are also free to integrate whatever weapons they want (Spike, Hellfire, UMTAS ATGM, CIRIT, Stinger…)

    But perhaps the most interesting of all are full marketing and IP rights for the T129 platform, incl. export to third parties. What’s there not to like? πŸ™‚

    except there are maybe less than 10 operational in 10 years . not operationally significant. with no export and mass production. it is more a burden.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174589
    JSR
    Participant

    If you watch the video carefully at around 0:30 mark, there are not 2 but at least 4, maybe 5-6 (or more) bombs hit the ground to the north. Unless target was open crop field, bombing was unimpressive.

    Judging by smoke and wind direction, 1st and 2nd parts of the video are likely to be just north of the bombed area in the 3rd part.

    so you make opinion based on video. who knows what the purpose for releasing the video. As i predicted there are low flying choppers flying around incase some of planes get down for pilot rescue.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/01/world/middleeast/syrian-rebels-say-russia-targets-them-rather-than-isis.html
    The town was paralyzed with terror, he said, as people hid in shelters and orchards. The local authorities called a curfew to keep people off the streets. Mr. Taha said that government helicopters swooped in on the heels of the Russian planes, dropping barrel bomb
    The strikes, he said, hit less than a half-mile from his house. β€œThe strikes were so accurate, and the sound was like an earthquake,” he said, adding that he had spotted two planes. β€œThe missiles exploded with black smoke and a bad smell.”

    in reply to: PLAAF crisis #2174592
    JSR
    Participant

    But what has China gained with their attempts at deception? I say very little. Its just like this current economic whirlpool China has found itself embroiled in. Once reality pulled the bamboo curtain back on the Chinese economy, China has been seen as a rank amateur in handling a modern economy. It is as they say: It all comes out in the wash.

    actually Chinese have managed economy very well when you look at from there perspective by massing so much hard currency in such short time that they can afford to mass migrate and can get even more wealthy in Canada/Australia/US. thats why you see that outflows.

    http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/15/news/economy/china-us-visa-eb5-immigrant-investor/
    U.S. runs out of investor visas again as Chinese flood program

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174879
    JSR
    Participant

    Without at all suggesting that no effort has been made, the Russians have been in theatre for days with very little intelligence gathering to draw on. .

    Russia is in Syria for decades they have very good intelligence and judgement. it’s time for west to switch sides . Otherwise low oil price and expensive wars will bring the result anyway.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175234
    JSR
    Participant

    if in 2013 that TLAM was lunched on Syria. Pretty soon Russia would have taken revenge on US allies in Europe or anywhere else. Putin whole doctorine is based around that.

    see this from 2013.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/12/putin-warns-us-not-to-attack-syria
    “[An American attack] could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further destabilise the Middle East and north Africa. It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.”

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175315
    JSR
    Participant

    IT is very easy to enter into a conflict and very difficult to exit out of it as recent operation in Afghanistan and Iraq has shown , what was suppose to be a quick short war got into long drawn out affair.

    those operations were conducted by relying on dubious allies and questionable strategy. remember tora-bora. no reliable people to close the routes not knowing that afghans can open the escape routes to highest bidder at the time.

    Russians must have a EXIT STRATEGY before they go into it , else this might be a long drawn out affair although with so many regional players its scope might vary

    This war will be highly profitable for Russia and Russia is got to train its soldiers and systems for free. in next 12 month an extra 2.5m bbl a day oil coming to market from Iran/Irak.
    Either Saudi starts war now to stop it or wait until one trick pony entire middlestern markets completely crushed.
    I will even predict that Russia may create a 21s century version of Israel with manageable secure borders and 100% loyal population. see the first strikes were done on moderates not on ISIS.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175486
    JSR
    Participant

    even bigger story is Germany has lost confidence on Turkey and any of its Coalition partners to solved it military. only the new coalition is the solution.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/29/us-syria-crisis-germany-idUSKCN0RT28G20150929
    Merkel warns of risks of ‘safe zone’ in northern Syria

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175497
    JSR
    Participant

    Not to play devils advocate here, well ok I am. But exactly how will a few hellducks assure Assad’s stability when there has been hundreds of aircraft from the US, several Gulf nations, etc. bombing ISIS and a few RuAF aircraft going to save the day for Assad?

    First there are about 32 strike aircraft and there is a lot more ground based firepower and attack chopper . than you add Syrian-Iraki-Iran airforce. so its a lot more aircrafts at short distance from battlefield. that’s why Iraki government so fast jump into this new coalition as they believe in Russian fire power and intelligence capabilities that will not be corrupted/influenced by any regional countries.

    there is no such thing as hundreds of coalition aircrafts involved and most of them not necessary drop bombs so its miss sorties.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175516
    JSR
    Participant

    This is no exaggeration. Hundreds of thousands of jihadists from all over the place. There are billions of Muslims. Of these, millions are jihadists. Even in Afghanistan USSR killed near 100,000 jihadists yet they didn’t make a dent in jihadist numbers. For every jihadist killed, 10 more jihadists take his place.

    100,000 from where you pulled this number from ? Saudi remain intact after 1980s that’s why problem is not solved. This time if the war is long enough and with correct weopons and methods are used will bring end to Saudi and the whole problem will be solved.

    battle lines are drawn now
    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/saudi-minister-military-option-oust-assad-34137456

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175610
    JSR
    Participant

    Yes you are spinning it despite Putin stating that Russian air power and ground troops will not be involved in combat. What part of “no combat” don’t you understand? Yes Putin has sanctioned the deployment and made the chess move, but he won’t be willing to have the body bags coming home from involvement in direct combat. No MLRS, no artillery strikes, and no air power strikes. Think of the consequences after making the UN statement and an aircraft is lost over IS or rebel held territory either through malfunction or shoot down?

    Just wait a bit. That targets of opportunity will be bombed. in such away that no chance of capture of pilot. There several supply ships coming . it takes couple of weeks to put all munition at place. No public statements will change fact on ground.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175664
    JSR
    Participant

    LOL! Not going your way so you have to spin it! Good job you are not in charge of anything military with statements such as “airplanes make too much noise and slow” πŸ™‚

    Spin it?. Aircrafts are noisy for picking individuals that can disperse. It’s not big static target. It’s very inefficient and expensive of fighting wars. The best is to create large loyal militia that can surround area to create meat grinder. Than at very last moment introduce airpower. Otherwise even Saudis will find out too many airframe hours against houtis and not enough airforce left for next war.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175728
    JSR
    Participant

    Putin says there will be no Russian air strikes unless approved by the UN in other words approved by America.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34387433

    Don’t bring every political statement here. Russia only consider a legal airstrike as an airstrike. I still think majority of strikes will be done with long range MLRS and artillery as they more effective. airplanes make too much noise and slow.

    in reply to: Su-30 for Iran #2175892
    JSR
    Participant

    That’s indeed funny !

    Who here in this forum raises all his hopes in regard to a possible Su-35 deal to China ONLY on public statements ???

    Anyway You get me wrong: I’m not a member of the Airbus & Boeing-only family. I really wish the SSJ, the MS-21 and the C919 all the best (as well as Bombardier and Embraer) – and would even welcome a deal with the PLAAF for that formidable fighter (even if a few don’t think so I’m not really thin-skinned or hypersensitive, I’m only realistic) – but I wish especially the Russian media should take Your advice and keep on facts … instead of raising hopes based on public statements !

    Deino

    did i raise anything related to Su-35 exports?. Su-35 production is too slow and so export will be last priority. on other hand SSJ can be supplied faster and is reasonably better than competitions. it has same space and comfort level as A320 so much more usefull.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175935
    JSR
    Participant

    Russia is loser of cold war. As a loser, like Germany and Japan, Russia has no right to bomb. Russia needs permission from the US to bomb. The US will never approve of that.

    Germany and Japan are clear loser with foreign troops occupying and dysfunctional economic and social systems. Almost complete dependence on foreign resources and that include labor working in foreign factories for them. Russia shed the unwanted part of business.

    in reply to: Su-30 for Iran #2176188
    JSR
    Participant

    21b$!!! There we are with the incentive to suddenly go in Syria. πŸ˜‰

    Do we have a report in English?

    There are much bigger incentives than $21bb. It is to manage conflicts in such away that Arab are forced to repatriate all there wealth from EU to battle middleastern wars. without Arabian wealth Germany will simply not able to afford eastern EU.

    http://m.arabianbusiness.com/saudi-arabia-withdraws-over-70bn-in-overseas-funds-report-607349.html

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/vw-scandal-qatar-investment-authority-suffers-heavy-loss-1521498

Viewing 15 posts - 1,981 through 1,995 (of 4,319 total)