How is that??? The USSR is no more and many Eastern European Countries (Poland for example) are in the Western Camp. Clearly, they’re not going to be purchasing much if any Russian Equipment. Plus, add Middle Eastern Countries like Iraq to that. Inadditon what about India to boot! Honestly the market for the F-35 is going to be extremely good in the next 20-30 years plus………
I am not even sure Eastern EU paid for those MIG-21 and earlier MIGs. despite energy prices were deeply discounted from USSR.
Poland is mere assembly line for Germanic companies and still has high unemployment. These assembly lines are shifting to countries that can buy products. see Auto industry example.
http://www.valuewalk.com/2013/08/germany-poland-economy/
Germany, by far Poland�s largest export market and accounting for over a quarter of the goods Poland sells outside its borders,
It’s interesting that the only procurement in aviation that seems to be proceeding well is off-shelf purchases of US aircraft (C-130J, C-17, AH-64, P-8).
Funnily enough the same thing happened in Australia in recent years – off-the-shelf purchases of F/A-18F and C-17 were quite successful compared to programs with extensive local participation ala failed SH-2G Sea Sprite).
If only people listened to Ricardo and Smith when it came to these issues.
C-130/C-17/P-8 total costs are about $7b. with $7b you cannot even buy weopons for 126 Rafales. so it is the scale that is much bigger.
it says 15% of pilots quit with each pilot costing $2m.
Turkey does licence produce F-16 but I don’t think it’s a 100% local content. Can anyone comment on local content percentage?
Also does Turkey produce any of the avionics?
No idea what’s settled on TF-X. It’s touted as 5th generation so one assumes stealth fighter. JAS-39E/F is not a fifth generation fighter.
To be honest, I think loading up on F-35A would be the way to go
Turkish content is practically zero for F-16. see this radar, HUD contract example. now add engines, ejection seat, aerospace titanium, canopy etc.
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/turkey-orders-30-f16c-block-50s-et-al-for-29b-02671/
Dec 24/09: HUDs. Lockheed Martin Corp., Fort Worth, TX receives a $7.2 million contract to incorporate Engineering Change Proposal 2746 and buy 35 wide angle raster heads up display (HUD) units for Turkey’s most recent “Peace Onyx IV” order of F-16 aircraft. At this time, the entire amount has been committed under management of the 312th AES/SYK at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH (FA8615-07-C-6034).
Dec 7/07: Radars. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., of Linthicum Heights, MD received an indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity and firm-fixed price contract for $730 million covering up to 54 AN/APG-68v9 radar systems. These radars are standard in F-16 C/D aircraft.
The first delivery order under the contract covers 30 radar systems for the government of Turkey, which will be accomplished under the firm fixed price portion of the contract and obligate $36 million as an initial payment. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH holds the contract (FA8615-08-D-6035, D001).
It was just shooting down JSRs argument of the Rafale somehow being an IR beacon relative to other fighters. Rafale related, but using another aircraft as the example.
My point is not only about Rafale heat/smoke but it is underpowerd so it needs that full afterburner for take off & empty low altitude flight performance. it is only enhanced by fast playback of the video.

Look i posed that video AFTER JSR trolling and while preciing it is a fanboyz video! … Type of argument !jsr could hear no?
And notice i didnt take any conclusion myself! i’m fully aware it doesnt mean anything as we do not know anthing about flight regimes, cameras etc.
you should watch the video posted again. it is smoke of afterburner in takeoff. Su-35 afterburner is very mild. and I think the video that you posted artificially in higher speed play to look Rafale agile. it is not real time.


And the rafale doing big lames and smoking? Dunno what jsr smoked to claim that…
you posted video with big smoke and big flame takeoff and that was empty aircraft. Rafale engine is not that advanced. no signature management.

Good to see the Russian Bear showing his strength again. It is abvout time to wake up and end the US influence in Europe and Asia (together with China).
why would Russia end US influence in EU and Asia. US overbearing influence has cut down EU /Japan defence industry. nothing economical can be producted. EU/Japan has loan exposure to US. US always keep China under pressure. This has benefit for Russia to sell arms and expensive natural resources to China.
see the upfront payment part. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/rosneft-says-signs-270-billion-063142420.html
i would say this whole traiing exercise is done for Middleast.
i can understand how you feel. russia took land from china too! almost all of russian siberia was part of china qing dynasty.
for sake of peace we do not press russia anymore, but china will take it back one day. just not today.
China is artificial state created by Soviet Communist party.It has no relationship with dynasties. i am not sure it can exist without Japanese loans and foreign investments.
if you compare border cities in china and russia, big big difference.
you can see here russian and chinese border city. Heihe is the one in the back, many new tall buildings. the russian city is in front. look like 1957
http://zhuanti.soulv.com/uploads/allimg/100608/6_100608094032_1.jpg
http://zhuanti.soulv.com/uploads/allimg/100608/6_100608094032_1.jpg
Tall buildings dont make place wealthy. It could be completely ghetto or built on loans
wealthy lives in independent houses and single story malls in neigborhood. not huge centralized shopping malls.
you never put too much population in border cities. how are you going to defend these cities?. Modern warfare is all about stand off weopons and real time survellence.
You should find infos researching about korrigan, manga and eusic programs. Since Lybia, and mali, anyone have doubts about the capability of rafale to operate in hot environment??? Btw no use linking me thhe demo of s35, i have seen it 3 times irl… And it used afterburner.
Your Rafale make too much smoke and big afterburning flame. and who knows how much internal fuel but point is fighter does not have surplus power. Su-35 is not showing any of it during its take off.
By sheer memory, i did a mistake : 7 countries but 5 plants afaik , thales, qinetiq, ums, finmecanicca and a sweden one. Plz notice this is by memory, not after extensive research.
your prone to making mistakes. it still not 7 countries. some are joint ventures of two countries. and none of them has the R&D size or the electronic scanning radars orders to make GaN cheaper. which itself is cheap technology. certainly not on scale of 5G engine.
Look, I’m not inclined to sit here all day explaining things to you, but consider America’s favourite hoo-rah narrative of why the Soviet Union lost the Cold War: because Reagan escalated military spending, thereby forcing the Soviet Union to attempt to follow suit, thereby bringing a faltering economic system to the point of collapse. That is to say, America won because it could out-spend the Soviet Union. Well, guess what –beginning around a decade from now, and increasingly thereafter, China will be able to out-spend the United States.
Again your own version of history. Soviet economic was stagnating before Regan came to power. America could out borrow Soviet Union that’s why it won cold war. There is no such lenders like Japan (when it was nation of rising sun) and Opec that could lend cheaply and on same scale to China. liquidity and depth of financial markets is the key.
you also have to consider China will also have to spend increasingly on health care. so GDP will become larger but that GDP will be entirely composed of Health care consumption. higher health care and retirement burden will constraint any arms race.
I know, btw 7 plants are certfied in europe. Why this tec isnt used on F35?
7 plants. where those 7 plants are located in EU and what they are producing currently.
Yeah I think only JSR has ever suggested that Rafale is underpowered. 😛
I only mention UAE report that Rafale is not powerfull enough for loaded operations in high temperature environment. and you can see from the video the amount of smoke coming out from afterburners and very high flames. That airshow is at small place
you cannot see any big afterburning flame or smoke. that is surplus power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FvezCyw1HY
cruise missile inventory starting point of modern attack. i would say Russia is going to cross 100,000 mark.
http://defense-update.com/20130706_russian_cruise_missiles.html
“We will boost the number of cruise missiles fivefold in the next three years and by 30 times by 2020,”
n a recent interview published at the Moscow Times Ilya Fyodorov, managing director of jet engine producer NPO Saturn noted ”We plan to produce over 1,500 such engines per year”, commenting on a recently signed agreement with Raduga, too manufacture cruise missile engines worth 4 billion rubles ($120 million)
And so where the other aircraft I mentioned. There’s no doubt that the programme was/is expensive, so why are you saying the Typhoon should have had everything when it was introduced? If you can answer that while taking everything into account, requirements, training, budget, R&D, costs, roles of other aircraft so on and so forth, you might start getting a bit of respect.
so lets take more complex aircraft like F-22. it is introduced with AESA radar, internal bays, TVC with IR suppression, largest thrust, steatlh so it is understandable it is going to cost alot more but basic things are already there. EF cannot be compared with such complexity. It is more comparable to J-10 development. and there is videos of short take off run of J-10 showing how light weight the fighter is.
Upgrades cost a lot for any programme, granted it progress has been mind numbingly slow, up until now that is, nevertheless, the upgrades and enhancements aren’t minor.
I asked you two questions regarding costs and how significant these enhancements and upgrades are, you’ve failed to provide anything.
You still have the same basic engine and radar and no CFT. so there is no fundamental difference. so all your upgrades are minor. no heavy jamming pods, there is not heavy 5 cruise missiles certified. nor any supersonic standoff weopons.
Who cares about India, they’re not part of the discussion so there’s no point in bringing them into it because you can’t grasp anything.
this was independent study done by Janes. so atleast what India cannot afford it is unlikely UK can afford the same thing.
Figures: Here you go, official:
http://www.nao.org.uk/report/ministry-of-defence-equipment-plan-2012-2022/
http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOD-equipment-plan-exec-summ.pdf
http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOD-equipment-plan-full-report.pdf
Which part isn’t self explanatory again?
see this paragraph. either equipment support costs are part of 159 billion plan or not. if they are part of 159billion it means real procurement will be alot less. and if not than you have way to big for your budget.
Notably, in agreement with the Department, this year the NAO has not performed any review of the Equipment Support costs, which make up just over half the Equipment Plan cost by value: £86 billion (54 per cent) of the total ten-year cost
Do you know the capabilities of the Storm Shadow? Somehow, I very much doubt that you do.
Size is irrelevant: What is relevant is that what they do, something you clearly doubt.
You’re blatantly ignoring what was previously stated, either that or you’re lacking something.
Care to go into details about that or do you just want to keep quiet and save yourself some embarrassment, another Troll was wise to do that.
It is old design missile with slower speed and higher weight. and not suitable for saturated attack. how many EF can carry it and what speed?
See Spitefire9’s post.
Spitfire8 didnot understoond my post. I said there alot of radar manufacturers it means atleast they can make older tech M scan radars. and seeing how Chinese perfect low end of the stuff as they make more of them. (see F-7 aka MIG-21 example). it is reasonable to assume that Chinese M scan radars will be better.