dark light

JSR

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,319 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2173605
    JSR
    Participant

    $45 oil is enough with current production rates. The problem is that incompetent government and inviting that technological backward coalition.

    invite Russia to one airbase and Irak will not have problem with those 4million displaced people (those will be dumped on turkey or Saudi) or airdefense again.

    Syria is very good template. first invite turkey to invade and than reimpose no fly zone on them and discredit the ground offensive.

    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-warplanes-to-not-fly-into-syria-after-threat-by-regime-.aspx?pageID=238&nID=105489&NewsCatID=352
    Turkish warplanes to not fly into Syria after threat by regime

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2011195
    JSR
    Participant

    3400t
    5 years to be commissioned
    20-40bln. roubles price tag

    Today my opinion on this ship changed on 180* – it’s going to be even a more epic fail, than 20380.

    what is the level of automation of the ship like how much crew needed. I am sure AESA radar with compact missile systems that can deal with saturated attack will cost some level of money.

    in reply to: Very light anti-tank plane #2173692
    JSR
    Participant

    your idea has not practical relevance. light aircraft with pilot?. it will need very high reliable engine and high quality construction to deal with stress of high sorties rates in middle of war. even UCAV that barely carry 2 or 4 weight anti tank weopons cost $50 to $100m and they are not that reliable or high mission rates and need long runways.

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2173871
    JSR
    Participant

    Irak needs high tech weopons that can negated much larger airforces of Turkey and Middleast. China simply cant provide them.

    in reply to: Israel's Lavi Fighter Program #2173886
    JSR
    Participant

    cfts are a bandaid solution. f-22 doesn’t use them either lol.

    F-22 belong to 1980s that’s why its production was curtailed and more expensive and more fuel capacity F-35 was introduced

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2173889
    JSR
    Participant

    where you get this information rafale is stealthiest fourth generation aircraft.

    in reply to: Israel's Lavi Fighter Program #2174141
    JSR
    Participant

    J-10 is not a very advance design. Where are the CFTs so that it does not carry those external tanks. Lavi is joke. There is no actual loads pics.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174208
    JSR
    Participant

    Final piece, article written by the director of shipbuilding, JSC. in Arms defense and techology review:
    (350 m long, 36 m wide, 15,000 ton capacity) – page 21
    https://issuu.com/airfleet/docs/arms-2010-5-site

    Rest my case, let others decide who is full of it. School is out.
    (honest apology for those coming to read in the Syria thread. I don’t like being called a liar, etc, when my information is correct and Wilhelm’s was B.S. and wishful thinking. As all the FACTS prove him wrong, I’m not going to post anymore about this)

    why this problem?. Shipyard extension is low tech work.thats why Chinese so easily bankrupt. Koreans and Japanese. I am sure once the carrier contract is awarded the ship years will be redesign for it.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174253
    JSR
    Participant

    I loled at “ethical grounds”

    .even bigger than Malta are forced to eat ethics.
    https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201610241046669557-sweden-saudi-arabia-women/
    only way to deal with it effective no fly zone in Middleast.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175914
    JSR
    Participant

    Hopefully you have more sense than Wilhelm. First off, Russia could theoretically build a carrier roughly the size of Kuznetsov in Russian ports (I exclude Zaliv for a few reasons- including black sea nuke rules). But, the dry dock issue is real. Look into it yourself. There is no place to build a ship the size of the Shtorm projects yet. Currently, the plan is to combine two existing dry docks together at Severnaya Verf. The dry docks are to be upgraded as will the cranes. Unless Russia uses the dated and very time consuming process of building a large carrier from the keel up, you need cranes with a large lifting capacity. I was not able to find a clear timetable of when this modernization was to be completed, the article dated from last year said 2018, but I don’t know if the work started yet.

    Sevmash has been mentioned, but Admiral Nakhimov eats up a lot of space and Kuznetsov is due for it’s 2017 refit. I doubt that they would use Zvezda (whenever it is completed 2022-?) as you want to have the facilities near where the ship is based (long way to sail if you have an issue). Even Kuznetzov is a challenge to find a suitable berth for, as for maintenance, the PD-50 floating dry dock was used for last refit.
    http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2015-news/december-2015-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/3393-following-modernization-severnaya-verf-shipyard-will-build-project-23560-leader-class-destroyers.html

    The other poster starting blabbering nonsense about various shipyards, he was wrong. I was correct about the dimensions of Baltiysky Zavod, not to mention it is a slipway with 80 ton cranes and (Russian officials have stated) 60,000 ton displacement limit {I said 40,000-45,0000 tons I will cop to being off on that}. None of this was to criticize Russia. I was pointing out the potential bottlenecks that need to be worked through before a carrier the size of the Shturm could be built that is all.

    why will blacksea nuke rules apply to Russia?

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2175932
    JSR
    Participant

    that Chinese allocation of engines until summer. Transport and bomber fleet using same engine.

    https://tiananmenstremendousachievements.wordpress.com/tag/h-6k/
    The article says that both Y-20 and H-6K had to use imported Russian D-30KP2 engines, but China has so far only imported 239 D-30KP2s. 41 of them have been used as spare engines for China’s 41 Il-76s with only 198 left, of which 24 have been used for Y-20 prototypes, the known number of which is 6.

    The 176 left are not enough for the production of H-6Ks, the known number of which is at least 120 that need 240 D-30KP2s. As China has not purchased or ordered any more D-30KP2 and as WS series engines have been proved usable, China must have used WS-18 on the later batches of H-6Ks it has produced

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2175964
    JSR
    Participant

    One of the big side advantage of all those Middleastern wars for Russia is that it has run down the stocks of Eastern block weopons and ammunition. Ruaf is blasting those ammunition dumps in Syria.
    I doubt there is any skilled labor left or investment that will ever compete again with Russian exports to Middleast/Africa.

    Ukraine export fall to just $300m of which $72m were to Russia.

    https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ukrainian-arms-exports-falling-short-lofty-goals.html
    Ukrainian arms exports falling short of lofty goals
    Plakhuta confirmed that Ukraine currently has no capacity to produce munitions in calibers from 5.45 mm assault rifle cartridges all the way up to 155 mm artillery shells. The only factory that made them is in Luhansk, which is now controlled by Kremlin-backed anti-government armed groups.

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2176642
    JSR
    Participant

    Saudis are dead broke. Its uae. past approvals have no bearing on current situation. coalition is now consider threat. They entered from Irak that attacked Syrian troops. you may see Iranian and Syrians jointly meet with Russians in past couple of meetings. Irak is too dysfunctional for sharing. They need another government that can run government efficiently and not waste money on Czech and Korean stuff. now it will have to compete with Iran for oil market share and that need very skill population to absorb industrial and extraction technologies.

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2176761
    JSR
    Participant

    Well from a recent (last week) Iraqi Finance ministry report to the parliament it has become known that Iraq has cut back massively on Russian arms purchases since last year due to a lack of funds. Russia has not been able to offer financing for Iraq’s weapons requests and so a number of large ticket items are essentially “on hold” (or maybe cancelled in polite speak). These include 24 MiG35, MSTA-S heavy artillery, T90 Tanks, BMP3 IFVs and S300V SAMs. The attack helos and a few radar stations survived the cut back.

    Similarly the finance ministry report revealed that the US has given $2.7Bn loan to fund weapons purchases from the US and, more interestingly China has provided a $2.5Bn loan for the purchase of Chinese weapons. China is Iraq’s main oil importer and runs Iraqi oil fields as well as other large infrastructure projects in Iraq (power stations, railways, car factories amongst others) and thus considers its ability to recover the loan to be strong.

    This development may open the door for both chinese HQ-9 (in Lieu of russian S300V) as well as J10 (instead of Russian MiG35).

    I don’t think it has anything to do with banking loans. Russia is equally or more invested in Iraki and Kurdistan oil like China. things like MIG-35/S300V are highly advanced electronics and as long as coalition is in Irak Russia will be hesitant to supply them. unlike in past Russia does not want to sully its reputation of export weopon systems. Irak will be dealing with Saudi and Turkish airforce and anything less than best of best will not work as Irak cant match them in quantity.

    look at the words export and higher.

    http://www.migavia.ru/index.php/ru/novosti/novosti-korporatsii/665-dmitrij-rogozin-osmotrel-proizvodstvo-novejshego-aviatsionnogo-kompleksa-mig-35
    We have just seen the car (MiG-35) to a high degree of readiness – soon it will be in its final form. We need to introduce its customers and to our society, to tell his compatriots what work has been done in recent years – said Dmitry Rogozin, adding that the MiG-35 is an export-oriented fighter. – Everyone must accept the work that is done and you need to explain what this car stands out from its competitors. To win, we can only in a competitive environment with the creation of the art that the head is higher than that offered by our competitors

    than there is also level of competence of government. Syria has 3 times larger border with Turkey with 3 times larger hostile population and how many bomb blast happen in Syrians cities once cleaned by Assad? and compare them to Irak in past 5 years. than there is Iran they also have big border with Turkey/Irak and nothing happens to them. that’s why Russia exported S300PMU2 6 month ahead of schedule.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2177300
    JSR
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,319 total)