Don’t take your eyes off the (real) ball here….
As has been said above, the “Reds” are great ambassadors for what (little:( ) is left of “Great” Britain these days, and £5 Million per annum to fund them is small beer compared to the inept waste of funds on (unneccesary) middle managers in the NHS etc.
However, the threat to the Reds may just be a smoke screen to get everyone looking in one direction while more critical cuts are actually made elsewhere behind our backs… don’t forget the current shower of a Government is a master of spin and subterfuge.
Of course, perhaps the theoretical £5m saving is earmarked to pay Uncle Tony’s pension when he steps down 😀
Paul F
It’s a Very impressive photo Paul – what sort of altitude were they at as they passed over – any ideas? Ever tried to get any other photos of orbiting items?
I saw the ISS and one of the shuttles pass directly overhead our place (Lewes, East Sussex, UK) five or six years ago, in similar circumstances, i.e. just after the shuttle had undocked, but without access to any impressive optics like yours they were just two fast moving “stars” very close to each other against the background star scape. Luckily the children were watching with me and they too saw them, and the memory stuck, as they remembered it when we were at Kennedy Space Centre and (luckily) saw them roll out the refurbished shuttle two years ago.
Cheers
Paul F
Lots of places are “north of Saffron Walden” – care to be more specific Robbo? 😀
And, why do you mention July, will you be in the area perchance? 😀 😀
Paul F
Stunning Shots Darren,
And fast becoming “historic” in terms of their content.
Paul F
They’re not the first….
Back in the 80’s ( or maybe the late 70’s?), El Al airliners used to carry defensive aids, though they were (IIRC) passive in nature rather than active “anti-missile” systems.
(Some of?) their airliners carried flare pods on the engine pylons, in hope of protecting them from hand launched heat seeking SAM’s which were percieved to be a realistic threat at that stage.
Photos of the modification appeared in the monthly mags at that time.
Paul F
“Close, but no cigar” for me then…
I stand (or sit) corrected
Paul F
My desk top showing my desktop, and the view outside
Here’s mine…..
My desk top showing my desktop, and the view outside
Here’s mine…..
Choices, Choices….
Go to Benidorm now, perhaps miss out on getting a decent job, and then get upset that you can’t afford to go back there again…
or
Go to job fair now, find a decent job, and you’ll have the cash to go to Benidorm (or somewhere far better:) )many times in the future, and have the cash to enjoy the trips…
It’s your call, but I know which I think is the better choice to make. As others have said, true friends will respect your decision , not ridicule you for it. I think that says it all really.
Paul F
Choices, Choices….
Go to Benidorm now, perhaps miss out on getting a decent job, and then get upset that you can’t afford to go back there again…
or
Go to job fair now, find a decent job, and you’ll have the cash to go to Benidorm (or somewhere far better:) )many times in the future, and have the cash to enjoy the trips…
It’s your call, but I know which I think is the better choice to make. As others have said, true friends will respect your decision , not ridicule you for it. I think that says it all really.
Paul F
Presumably this thread will be resssurected in 2032 when the Falklands Documents are all de-classified under the offical secrets “50 Years” rule?
Still think it’s a case of a “thin” thread of truth (i.e. the consideration of possible re-activation of moth-balled airframes in order to plug a capability gap in times of conflict) being over fed on Bonios and thus becoming a very large, very shaggy, dog….
If a float-equipped Gannet did set off for the Falklands with an ex-Retirement crew, and was equipped for AAR, from which type of tanker did it take on fuel en route? And, why hasn’t news of the escapade ever leaked out in any of the offical and unaofficial accounts of the conflict. Surely someone would have let it slip by now, either out of a “You wouldn’t beleive it but…” or out of a “How’s this for a bit of good old British ingenuity then…” spirit.
Sorry to burst the bubble guys, but it’s strictly a flight of (float-borne:p ) fancy I believe.
But I’m happy to be proven wrong……wake me up (or dig me up:eek: ) in 2032 and let me know,
Paul F
P.S. (Remembers after posting..)Dowty Rotol resurrected a Gannet for contra-prop noise trials at some stage after they had been retired didn’t they, and I have magazine photos somewhere showing it airborne with a very long test probe mounted on the leading edge of one wingtip – to which microphones were fixed during the trials. Has someone seen the same pics and misinterpreted the forward pointing microphone boom as a long AAR probe perhaps:rolleyes: ?
Were these to have been new build, or conversions of existing airframes? 😉
Yep, Falklands conflict did highlight a lack of shipborne AEW capacity, but I don’t remember any mention of Float-borne Gannets being developed at the time, though maybe they were another of the MoD’s “quick fixes” of the period akin to the conversion of Vulcans to tankers using bolt on garden shed affairs under the tailcone, or the mounting of air to air missiles on Nimrods etc etc.
Presumably they would have had to recover all the retired Gannet airframes from the various museums and private collectors, get them all back up to airworthy status, find some flight-ready crews, then bolt on some new build floats and do a couple of test flights……before somehow getting them all the way to the South Atlantic in a hurry – or were they going to bolt on an air -to-air refuelling probe too..!!!
Sorry, but I think this story is definitely wagging a very large, and very shaggy, tail. Woof Woof 😀
Paul F
Possible BA Cabin Crew Strike
Anyone like to bet against the first strike date(s) being during the week before (or actually over?) the Easter w/e – Say 4th – 9th April :rolleyes:
This gives both sides a chance to play the usual brinkmanship games for a month or two before a strike becomes necessary to make the point.
So, yet again, the travelling public, who are the people who ultimately foot the wage bill for BA personnel (inc cabin crew), have their Easter travel plans at best threatened, and at worst disrupted.
A disruptive strike is probably not the best way to ensure your high profile employer remains in business and remains in profit, and thus keeps people in paid employment, but hey ho, I’m sure they know what’s best for themsleves and their careers with BA in the long term …
I think the BA crew member form Gatwick, as quoted in the earlier post, has a good grasp of life in the “real” world.
Paul F
Rechargeable Cells
Can’t comment about SLR Batteries yet (though my first additional “pattern” unit for my recently acquired EOS350D has just arrived, it cost £15 as opposed to ca.£45 for a genuine Canon cell).
However, I have used non-branded rechargeable cells on various Canon camcorders for 15 years, with no problems.
I would recommend using one of the web-retaillers rather than buy bargain basement cells off un-proven ebay sellers, I would also recommend use of well established brands such as Uniross, Hahnel etc.
On (older type)camcorder cells many pattern brands offer “universal” cells to which you fit one of a number of compatibility “mounts” or “covers” to suit the brand of camcorder you have. I prefer cells tailored to fit directly without such adaptors, simply as it’s one less thing to lose/break, and a proper fit also reduces chances of the British weather getting into the electrics too – not that any of us use our equipment in the inclement British summer of course… The pattern cells for current SLRs (and presumably for the current smaller camcorders too) seem more specific, and are proper matches to the original branded part.
If you enter your battery description on G**gle or similar, then you will probably find many of the hits are for “pattern” brands, and by following the links back to traders’ webpages you can find many suitable “fits” at varying prices.
Do take care to check the cell capacity before purchase, as some do not match the branded units, some are lower in terms of mAH, but you can also often find higher capacity units which will fit the camera/camcorder and last longer between recharges than branded units.
Of course, few of the camera manufacturers actually manufacture cells themselves anyway, they subcontract the work out to manufacturers who specialise in cell manufacture – so in effect the cell supplied originally is probably only a “badge engineered ” unit anyway ;).
Paul F
Niiiice 🙂
Paul F