dark light

RamboII

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Heron at Coventry G-AORG #1298685
    RamboII
    Participant

    quick pic of G-AORG taken today as I walked past classic flight’s hanger, apologies for the quality but it was on a camera phone. A brief chat with one of the engineer’s reveals that the major work has been mainly completed and it’s just rebuilding her. That’s one job I really don’t envy them:eek:

    in reply to: Heron at Coventry G-AORG #1302221
    RamboII
    Participant

    I think most if not all of the rumours are true. I work on the airport although not as part of the Atlantic group but they’re pretty open guys and let me and mates have a quick nose now and again. The main problem seems to have been major structural corrosion. each time I’ve popped my head through the door she’s either had a wing, all engine’s are missing although 2 are next to her and the enterior looks pretty gutted.

    in reply to: XR537 G-NATY – Permit to Fly (merged) #1304323
    RamboII
    Participant

    heck why not a Foxy Lady supporters club, it work’s for Sally-B and VTS even Classic Flight have their Members club

    in reply to: XR537 G-NATY – Permit to Fly (merged) #1304325
    RamboII
    Participant

    😀 seriously though XR537 are we likely to see an increased De Hav fleet in the future. The matter of sponsership for G-CVIX has been mooted several times by the looks of things and the trail seems to have gone cold. Unlike other high maintenance aircraft like XH588 there has been little if no media coverage of G-CVIX’s plight nor any mention of her current fate, which we can only assume is languishing in a dark dusty corner of De Hav’s hanger, or worse outside exposed to the elements. You may laugh at the idea of contributions to G-CVIX’s running but give us the means to do so and advertise it, as VTS and Air Atlantique Classic Flight have done in the past not to mention Sally-B, and the vast majority of us would whole heartedly contribute what little or much we could, if it meant seeing such a rare beast fly again.

    in reply to: XR537 G-NATY – Permit to Fly (merged) #1304610
    RamboII
    Participant

    now that G-NATY is finally airborne will there be a concerted effort to have de hav’s other aircraft in the air in the not too distant future? I think I can speak for any number of people here that the loss of G-CVIX from our skies is a crying shame and we’d gladly do what it takes to get her airborne again.

    in reply to: Believed to be from… a B-17 ? #1308555
    RamboII
    Participant

    :diablo: just reported him to evil bay customer support

    in reply to: Initial Listing for Jersey Air Show, 13 September 2007 #1319230
    RamboII
    Participant

    given the condition of Heron G-AORG when I saw her at Air Atlantique’s open day yesterday I think they must be being just alittle hopeful to have her flying by september…’september what year?’ might be better!:(

    in reply to: No British twins flying #1319556
    RamboII
    Participant

    both are apparently! One the FW189 is the ‘Uhu’ “Eagle owl” and the HE219 the ‘Uhu’ “owl”

    in reply to: No British twins flying #1319762
    RamboII
    Participant

    no one seems to have mentioned the ultra rare FW189 Uhu that’s being restored to supposed flying condition here. Not British or even allied I know but significant.

    in reply to: Interesting Photo #1323482
    RamboII
    Participant

    on the way to the fly-in martin noticed the blades weren’t quite polished enough

    in reply to: Sea Fury WG655 #1330667
    RamboII
    Participant

    – John Bradshaw (former?): Sea Fury FB.10, G-CBEL.

    surely she’s a fury rather than sea fury as she has no wing fold

    in reply to: Public and the Vulcan First Flight #1331670
    RamboII
    Participant

    allow me to amend my previous post. All aircraft coming out of a complete rebuild WILL have a certain amount of teething problems, be it a slightly low rpm reading on an engine or a leaking oleo leg from new seals bedding themselves in, (been there done that and got the t-shirt, several times around) no rebuild or restoration is THAT perfect (unless it’s sat in a museum). All of you bear in mind that this will be the first aircraft (officially) on the CAA Permit to Fly register that is catagorised as COMPLEX. There are numerous little snags that can be found after the first flight of such a complex rebuild most of which can not be found during the ground testing phase as the aircraft is not subjected to the same loading, stresses and strains as it is during flight. It only takes one uninformed person to see a small leak of fluid from somewhere and make more out of it than is necessary. Yes this aircraft is a comprehensive rebuild but she is a 30+ year old airframe at best, and all old aircraft suffer from the same ailments and she is easily 3 times the size of most rebuilt aircraft today, a dinky Spitty she is not. Despite any air and ground crew’s professionalism and experience the first test flight is always a nerve racking experience and the least people that witness any **** up big or small the better. yes it may still filter out but atleast the doom sayers and no nothings cann’t witness it first hand and start completely false rumours.

    in reply to: Public and the Vulcan First Flight #1242500
    RamboII
    Participant

    the first flight probably won’t be the official unveilling first flight, for a number of reasons. This is an aircraft straight out of a complete rebuild, therefore full of snags and gremlins….no matter how good the engineering team it’s just a fact of life. Can you imagine the quantity of egg on face should say the gear malfunction or an engine problem occur or, god forbid, the aircraft crash. The last thing the owners and organisers are going to want is to look like a bunch of idiots infront of the world’s press and the attendant spectators. You can imagine the headlines now ‘Vexed Vulcan!’, ‘White Elephant of Brunty’, ‘Busted Bomber’ etc..etc. Better the first few flights be carried out in peace and quiet, without undue pressure on air and ground crew to make her servicable as quickly as possible, at the cost of safety and future servicability.

    in reply to: Classic Flight DC-6 #1253645
    RamboII
    Participant

    Rambo!!,

    I’ll take your big P&W radials and raise you an R-3350. Nothing quite beats that!!:cool:

    G’day 😉

    Ahh ha very good! but how many of them are still airborne?:D and I’ll take your R-3350 and raise you my P&W R-4360:diablo:

    in reply to: Classic Flight DC-6 #1254857
    RamboII
    Participant

    😀 great thanks Tom, I shall now get my umbrella and stand out in the garden with 1) my Digital camera and 2) my camcorder, nothing beats big pratt and whitney radials

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)